Erasing history, should we do it?
Yes, the Americans, the Germans, the Russians, everybody committed atrocities. And they should be held accountable. for them. We have to seek to prevent these sorts of atrocities in the future.
The real question is: who would you want to live under?
1. Nazi Germany
2. The USSR
3. "America"
Pepe wrote:
Spiderpig wrote:
Great idea! They rejected "Jewish science", which meant they failed to get nukes ready in time for the war, and otherwise they might even have won it. Let's do the same with anything associated with the Nazis---what could go wrong?
I heard somewhere where the Amerikans employed hundreds of thousands of individuals to work on the Manhattan project...

I suspect they had the edge...


I don't know how to take that post. My first impression is that it's yet another instance of the good ol' "Gratuitously point out something basic your interlocutor has already taken into account, to shame them by making it look like they have no clue what they're saying at all. Preferably don't even bother to try to understand their point" trick. I don't even claim to be particularly knowledgeable about World War II, but I do know the Nazis rejected "Jewish science" because of its association with Jews, and it cost them dearly, as was to be expected. Science has no race.
_________________
The red lake has been forgotten. A dust devil stuns you long enough to shroud forever those last shards of wisdom. The breeze rocking this forlorn wasteland whispers in your ears, “Não resta mais que uma sombra”.
Kraichgauer
Veteran

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,150
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
sly279 wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Pepe wrote:
Spiderpig wrote:
Great idea! They rejected "Jewish science", which meant they failed to get nukes ready in time for the war, and otherwise they might even have won it. Let's do the same with anything associated with the Nazis---what could go wrong?
I heard somewhere where the Amerikans employed hundreds of thousands of individuals to work on the Manhattan project...

I suspect they had the edge...

And the simple fact was, Hitler's man on the Nazi atomic bomb project, Werner Heisenberg, had purposely dragged his feet to prevent Hitler from getting the bomb. But even if he was dedicated to making Nazi Germany an atomic power, it turns out that while Heisenberg thought he knew how to build the bomb, he actually didn't. Now that's irony!
We blew up their heavy water production which set them back a long while
I remember an episode of Hogan's Heroes in which Col. Klink had accidentally drank heavy water. He sheepishly asked, "Am I going to die?"

_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
kraftiekortie wrote:
Yes, the Americans, the Germans, the Russians, everybody committed atrocities. And they should be held accountable. for them. We have to seek to prevent these sorts of atrocities in the future.
The real question is: who would you want to live under?
1. Nazi Germany
2. The USSR
3. "America"
The real question is: who would you want to live under?
1. Nazi Germany
2. The USSR
3. "America"
Obviously America...

Well, more accurately, a Democracy...
I shudder to think what it was like living in Nazi Germany...
Bad enough for NTs...
But one's worst nightmare for those on the spectrum...
Pepe wrote:
I shudder to think what it was like living in Nazi Germany...
I recommend "School for Barbarians: Education under the Nazis" by Erika Mann, published in 1938, which I read recently. It gives you a taste of it from a dissenters point of view.
_________________
Behold! we are not bound for ever to the circles of the world, and beyond them is more than memory, Farewell!
Kraichgauer wrote:
Pepe wrote:
auntblabby wrote:
^^^and thank god for that!
Thank God the Amerikans dropped the bomb on the Japanese rather than the Krauts...
Errr...why are you guys looking at me funny?


Had Germany not surrendered when it did, they very probably would have been targeted with an atomic bomb.
Doubt it. Berlin has fallen what would we nuked? Almost all Germany was in allied control by their surrender. Only troops in Norway and Austria remained. They were defeated months before they surrendered. No point in nuking them. Russians wouldn’t have liked being nukes alongside the Germans either.
Maybe if the bomb had been finished 6 months earlier like around the battle of the bulge they’d used it on Berlin, but German was done already by then. They knew it, we knew it. Was only a matter of time. Leader with something left to save would surrendered earlier. But Hitler and nazis has nothing to look forward to but death so why not scarifice every single German to give them another few months or year of life. They never cared for the German people anyways.
kraftiekortie wrote:
Yes, the Americans, the Germans, the Russians, everybody committed atrocities. And they should be held accountable. for them. We have to seek to prevent these sorts of atrocities in the future.
The real question is: who would you want to live under?
1. Nazi Germany
2. The USSR
3. "America"
The real question is: who would you want to live under?
1. Nazi Germany
2. The USSR
3. "America"
Depends are you Native American and is it the America of the 1800s cause they probably kill you. Let’s not cherry pick. Sucked to be black too.
Let’s call it the 13 states America.
Also wasn’t so great for poor whites . Yay indutured service I’m technically free man but inndebt to the company who’ll kill me if I try to leave.
We rounded up people into camps and walked them to desth, mass killed entire tribes(nations) sure we didn’t have a gas chamber but gas didn’t exist yet. If it hadn’t I could see us having used it. We also approved of killing the disabled people.
Every nation on this planet has its bad hisotry no one’s hands are clean. We aren’t responsible for past atrocities but I certainly won’t let them be erased or forgotten. USA did some horrible things that under current law would seen us having a Nuremberg trial for our leaders and generals just like nazis had. If the nazis has done what hey did 100 years earlier no one would have cared and just seen it as war as usual. Nations would wipe out their enemy and kill millions then repopulate the area with their people all the time. Huns wiped out whole civilizations for fun on a whim. They’re leave one building in tact so others would know what happen.
Thank god we live today where such things are condemned like what Isis is doing(they’re using the old rule book most of us threw out)
Kraichgauer
Veteran

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,150
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
sly279 wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Pepe wrote:
auntblabby wrote:
^^^and thank god for that!
Thank God the Amerikans dropped the bomb on the Japanese rather than the Krauts...
Errr...why are you guys looking at me funny?


Had Germany not surrendered when it did, they very probably would have been targeted with an atomic bomb.
Doubt it. Berlin has fallen what would we nuked? Almost all Germany was in allied control by their surrender. Only troops in Norway and Austria remained. They were defeated months before they surrendered. No point in nuking them. Russians wouldn’t have liked being nukes alongside the Germans either.
Maybe if the bomb had been finished 6 months earlier like around the battle of the bulge they’d used it on Berlin, but German was done already by then. They knew it, we knew it. Was only a matter of time. Leader with something left to save would surrendered earlier. But Hitler and nazis has nothing to look forward to but death so why not scarifice every single German to give them another few months or year of life. They never cared for the German people anyways.
Yes, I was referring to earlier in the war if America had had the bomb prior to the time the had actually developed fat man and little boy.
Incidentally, when a psychological profile on Hitler had been written up, it was determined he would eventually commit suicide in the middle of a Gotterdammerung of his own making.
_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
Kraichgauer wrote:
sly279 wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Pepe wrote:
auntblabby wrote:
^^^and thank god for that!
Thank God the Amerikans dropped the bomb on the Japanese rather than the Krauts...
Errr...why are you guys looking at me funny?


Had Germany not surrendered when it did, they very probably would have been targeted with an atomic bomb.
Doubt it. Berlin has fallen what would we nuked? Almost all Germany was in allied control by their surrender. Only troops in Norway and Austria remained. They were defeated months before they surrendered. No point in nuking them. Russians wouldn’t have liked being nukes alongside the Germans either.
Maybe if the bomb had been finished 6 months earlier like around the battle of the bulge they’d used it on Berlin, but German was done already by then. They knew it, we knew it. Was only a matter of time. Leader with something left to save would surrendered earlier. But Hitler and nazis has nothing to look forward to but death so why not scarifice every single German to give them another few months or year of life. They never cared for the German people anyways.
Yes, I was referring to earlier in the war if America had had the bomb prior to the time the had actually developed fat man and little boy.
Incidentally, when a psychological profile on Hitler had been written up, it was determined he would eventually commit suicide in the middle of a Gotterdammerung of his own making.
The allies decided not to kill hitler cause he was horrible for the war effort. If we’d taken out Berlin someone sane and better at war tactics would have taken over.
I dont know what Gotterdammerung is.
And they were right, if not for hitler they’d had full air force of jet fighters and very infantry soldier with an assault rifle. Hitler disliked both he only wants what they had when he served. Good old bolt action rifle and propellor planes. Stg44 had to be hidden as a SMg to get produced and issued without hitler knowing delaying its adoption by years. He want d super weapons too and so wasted funding on them. Stuff like the tiger tank that broke down more then it died in combat. More panzer tanks would helped the war effort. Smaller, faster good armored and quick per to make, how bout pulling troops to capture oil fields instead if putting the final blow into Moscow, or the invasion of Russia to begin with. Battle of the bulge, another blunder by hitler, or the delaying armor units from pushing the allies back in dday(would had a different outcome if they didn’t require direct orders from hitler) he micro manage the whole military himself. So did his generals. The subs were sank and code broke because they raidioed each sub often rather then leaving command decisions up to the sub commander. Hitler had good generals and officers but they were allowed to do anything with out his say or anything he disagreeed with like say tactical withdraws, Germans do not surrender or retreat hitler said. Good way to lose man power in pointless batttles. Hitler goes down in military history as what not to do. The earlier successes were organized by the military m hitler then took credit and actually believed he did it and that’s when he started micro managering it. Our president gave general orders and our military then planned the battles. Imagine if trump or obama planne every military operation we did. Neither are skilled in military tactics. It’d be a disaster. Hitler cut off his military’s legs. Thank good for that. Stalin while would purge his generals left military strategy to them. Once they got too popular he’d just purge them. Looking at North Korea’s military blunders, I bet Kim is also micro managing his military. Another reason war for them would be a disaster. If you can’t cook stay out of th kitchen and let those who can , cook.
sly279 wrote:
But Hitler and nazis has nothing to look forward to but death so why not scarifice every single German to give them another few months or year of life. They never cared for the German people anyways.
I thought the same when I was younger until I researched...
Once again, I am not defending Hitler...
I am respecting the historic truth...
The following might help you understand the zeigeist:
There was a German saying nearing the end of the war:
"Enjoy the war. The peace will be dreadful."
The Morgenthau Plan was released to the public giving Goebbels perfect propaganda material to extend the war:
Quote:
The Morgenthau Plan would have led to the death by starvation and pestilence of ten million Germans in the first two years after the war, in addition to the one million who had been killed in the saturation bombing and the three million killed in the enforced expulsion from Germany's eastern territories.
Much still remains to be revealed about the Morgenthau Plan. Dr Joseph Goebbels, Nazi propaganda minister, made enough capital from it to inflict tens of thousands of extra casualties on British and American troops in the battles that followed its publication, and in the autumn 1944 U.S. presidential election campaign Roosevelt's opponent Thomas Dewey lost no time in pointing this out. 'The publishing of this Plan,' claimed Dewey, 'was as good as ten fresh German divisions.'http://www.fpp.co.uk/bookchapters/Morgenthau.html
Much still remains to be revealed about the Morgenthau Plan. Dr Joseph Goebbels, Nazi propaganda minister, made enough capital from it to inflict tens of thousands of extra casualties on British and American troops in the battles that followed its publication, and in the autumn 1944 U.S. presidential election campaign Roosevelt's opponent Thomas Dewey lost no time in pointing this out. 'The publishing of this Plan,' claimed Dewey, 'was as good as ten fresh German divisions.'http://www.fpp.co.uk/bookchapters/Morgenthau.html
Quote:
So why did the Germans resist so fiercely for a lost cause at Arnhem?
Mr Dombrowski remarked: "Life's deeper issues did not concern us too much. We were prepared to fight on."
German units often consisted of a core of veterans, wounded several times in many campaigns, serving with teenagers and partially disabled troops.
One veteran remembered that in each platoon there would be a "Veruckte [Crazy] Helmut". These were men so blighted by the loss of loved ones to Allied bombing or the Soviet advance that they resolved to fight to the last.
If there were doubts over Hitler's leadership after debacles both in east and west that summer, they had been neutralised by the Allied call for unconditional surrender which confirmed a gut reaction they had to fight on. That demand blurred the distinction between Nazi and anti-Nazi.https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/147194 ... death.html
Mr Dombrowski remarked: "Life's deeper issues did not concern us too much. We were prepared to fight on."
German units often consisted of a core of veterans, wounded several times in many campaigns, serving with teenagers and partially disabled troops.
One veteran remembered that in each platoon there would be a "Veruckte [Crazy] Helmut". These were men so blighted by the loss of loved ones to Allied bombing or the Soviet advance that they resolved to fight to the last.
If there were doubts over Hitler's leadership after debacles both in east and west that summer, they had been neutralised by the Allied call for unconditional surrender which confirmed a gut reaction they had to fight on. That demand blurred the distinction between Nazi and anti-Nazi.https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/147194 ... death.html
And then there was this goose:
Quote:
Germany Must Perish! is a 104-page book written by Theodore Newman Kaufman, which he self-published in 1941 in the United States. The book advocated sterilization of all Germans and the territorial dismemberment of Germany, believing that this would achieve world peace. Kaufman founded the Argyle Press in Newark, New Jersey, United States, in order to publish this book. He was the sole proprietor of the Argyle Press and it is not known to have published any other works.
The Nazi Party used the book, written by a Jewish author, to support their argument that Jews were plotting against their country.[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Germany_Must_Perish!
The Nazi Party used the book, written by a Jewish author, to support their argument that Jews were plotting against their country.[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Germany_Must_Perish!
Kraichgauer
Veteran

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,150
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
sly279 wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
sly279 wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Pepe wrote:
auntblabby wrote:
^^^and thank god for that!
Thank God the Amerikans dropped the bomb on the Japanese rather than the Krauts...
Errr...why are you guys looking at me funny?


Had Germany not surrendered when it did, they very probably would have been targeted with an atomic bomb.
Doubt it. Berlin has fallen what would we nuked? Almost all Germany was in allied control by their surrender. Only troops in Norway and Austria remained. They were defeated months before they surrendered. No point in nuking them. Russians wouldn’t have liked being nukes alongside the Germans either.
Maybe if the bomb had been finished 6 months earlier like around the battle of the bulge they’d used it on Berlin, but German was done already by then. They knew it, we knew it. Was only a matter of time. Leader with something left to save would surrendered earlier. But Hitler and nazis has nothing to look forward to but death so why not scarifice every single German to give them another few months or year of life. They never cared for the German people anyways.
Yes, I was referring to earlier in the war if America had had the bomb prior to the time the had actually developed fat man and little boy.
Incidentally, when a psychological profile on Hitler had been written up, it was determined he would eventually commit suicide in the middle of a Gotterdammerung of his own making.
The allies decided not to kill hitler cause he was horrible for the war effort. If we’d taken out Berlin someone sane and better at war tactics would have taken over.
I dont know what Gotterdammerung is.
And they were right, if not for hitler they’d had full air force of jet fighters and very infantry soldier with an assault rifle. Hitler disliked both he only wants what they had when he served. Good old bolt action rifle and propellor planes. Stg44 had to be hidden as a SMg to get produced and issued without hitler knowing delaying its adoption by years. He want d super weapons too and so wasted funding on them. Stuff like the tiger tank that broke down more then it died in combat. More panzer tanks would helped the war effort. Smaller, faster good armored and quick per to make, how bout pulling troops to capture oil fields instead if putting the final blow into Moscow, or the invasion of Russia to begin with. Battle of the bulge, another blunder by hitler, or the delaying armor units from pushing the allies back in dday(would had a different outcome if they didn’t require direct orders from hitler) he micro manage the whole military himself. So did his generals. The subs were sank and code broke because they raidioed each sub often rather then leaving command decisions up to the sub commander. Hitler had good generals and officers but they were allowed to do anything with out his say or anything he disagreeed with like say tactical withdraws, Germans do not surrender or retreat hitler said. Good way to lose man power in pointless batttles. Hitler goes down in military history as what not to do. The earlier successes were organized by the military m hitler then took credit and actually believed he did it and that’s when he started micro managering it. Our president gave general orders and our military then planned the battles. Imagine if trump or obama planne every military operation we did. Neither are skilled in military tactics. It’d be a disaster. Hitler cut off his military’s legs. Thank good for that. Stalin while would purge his generals left military strategy to them. Once they got too popular he’d just purge them. Looking at North Korea’s military blunders, I bet Kim is also micro managing his military. Another reason war for them would be a disaster. If you can’t cook stay out of th kitchen and let those who can , cook.
The Gotterdammerung was the same as Ragnarok - that is, the Norse/Germanic end of the world, complete with raging fires, dreadful monsters, and the death of the old gods. Wagner used the term in his Ring Cycle operas, dealing with the hero Siegfried, who had been the Germanic Heracles/Samson/Gilgamesh, which Hitler was a keen student of.
_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer