AspE wrote:
Oh good, the "argument from sports". Didn't realize important social issue should be decided based on what sports you can play.
Actually I just picked one argument, would you like me to present more information to show you the biological differences in men and women? I find it very insane that someone would insist the biological men are no different from biological women. The argument suggests that men are women with a penis, not according to biology. I've laid out arguments for it before that you never even commented on?
AspE wrote:
Free speech is a right to expression that cannot be repressed by THE GOVERNMENT.
Yet some are fighting to allow the government to do just that and that was why I mentioned it.
AspE wrote:
Not people also expressing themselves by not desiring to listen to your noise.
Not sure exactly what you mean here. True, people do not have to listen to things they don't want to listen to. Should people be able to prevent others from listening to someone they want to listen to? Let me ask you this, do you think it is ok for atheists to invade a church and yell over the pastor preventing the religious people attending from being able to hear what the pastor is saying, call me crazy but that sounds more like disturbing the peace, no one is forcing the atheists to attend the church.
Or, lets take you back to your college days(not sure if you are still in college), say a group of people enter the classroom to prevent the teacher from being heard. Would you agree that they have the right to prevent you from learning by 'boycotting' the classroom?
AspE wrote:
Deplatforming is also a form of speech
Basically you are saying, it's ok to prevent people from free speech. ???
Last edited by Crimadella on 14 Feb 2019, 12:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.