magz wrote:
Are you and Amerindian? I'm not a radical liberal but I'm totally willing to listen!
I'm Abenaki.
magz wrote:
In 19th century Polish literature, sufferings of Indigenous Americans were often used as a camouflaged allegory of sufferings of Poles, to trick censorship. That probably made us traditionally more sympathetic towards the First Nations, which is continuously present in our popular literature - including authors like Cejrowski, a hardcore right-winger, writing about his encounters with Amazonian tribes, sympathising with them and defending their point of view.
From what I learned reading Wikipedia, colonization of North America included several crimes against humanity and plenty of more subtle assholeness - like Canadian indigenous laws that one loses for... finishing a high school - which is practically preventing constructive synthesis of Amerindian culture and modern civilisation!
That makes sense. As much as often historic portrayals are sometimes problematic they also have probably bought us a degree of good will. The 'crying Indian' from the old PSAs wasn't actually indigenous, but he's also someone who used that position to be a respectful goodwill ambassador and genuine advocate. These questions aren't 100% black and white.
Historically the goal was often 100% assimilation with a complete abandonment of traditions and any sort of connection to them and it was pursued through a wide range of policies. Abusing kids for using their mother tongue in schools, denying status to children born of mixed marriages when the father was white, banning cultural practices, etc were all intended to slowly eradicate our identity even if our genetics didn't vanish. It's genocide even if that phrase makes some people uncomfortable because it's not the same type of genocide as the Holocaust. Most historic genocides didn't resemble the Holocaust, the technology that enabled it was new and single-mindedness towards that goal only rarely was maintained meaning most historic genocides represent waves of violence and then more passive relations.
_________________
The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the oppressing. —Malcolm X
Just a reminder: under international law, an occupying power has no right of self-defense, and those who are occupied have the right and duty to liberate themselves by any means possible.