I don't really understand all the big science behind it all either, but honestly, I don't feel like I need to. I get the general idea, and that's enough for me when it comes to understanding it. As for doing something about it, I'm just one person without any real chances of doing something big, so I'll just do the little things I can, like taking care of recycling what I can, lessening the amount of meat I eat (might consider giving up red meat at some point), making sure my own trash doesn't end up in nature (and occasionally cleaning up someone else's), taking care of the plants at my parents' farm when I'm there with what little skill I have on the matter etc. And that's about it. Little things that don't mean anything in the big picture, but if everyone takes care of little things like that, it'll start to mean something.
What I hate about climate change -talk are the activists who demand unreasonable sacrifices from regular folk... usually, around here these people are city people who don't really have much experience living outside of the cities and so don't understand that in the countryside it's just not realistic to "live green" the way they do. There is no public transportation in most places and in many of those that do it's poor, so people need cars of their own just for their basic needs, like getting to work and getting groceries.
Honestly, in December I talked with this guy who kept saying that we don't need to produce our own food here in Finland where we need lots of electricity for it 'cause we can buy it from elsewhere. I asked him what about emergencies where all countries watch their own backs first (and the backs of those who they can benefit the most after that), but he said such emergency is very unlikely in today's world.
...
At the moment, I regret not answering with "Have you ever heard of Putin?"
But then again, I would've probably been accused of some type of discrimination at the time if I did, so guess it's good that I didn't.
kraftiekortie wrote:
It's the acceleration of the "change" that's the problem--more than the presence of the "change" itself.
This sums up nicely as the counter argument for "the climate has always been changing; change is natural!"