Teen severely maimed, possibly by Orthodox Jews
history_of_psychiatry wrote:
Ragtime wrote:
history_of_psychiatry wrote:
i really don't feel bad for people who believe in procelytizing others. Well, I DO feel bad for people who believe in proselytizing others, but i don't usually feel bad when something bad happens to them.
Okay. Then God won't feel bad for you if you have trouble getting into Heaven without His help. Why should He?
"Do not judge so that you will not be judged. For in the way you judge, you will be judged; and by your standard of measure, it will be measured to you" (Matt 7:1-2).
Just making sure you know.
Don't lay that biblical breeze on me.
I'm just saying... People shouldn't feel sorry for you if you ever get horribly maimed, should they?

It's hypocrisy, therefore, for you to say, "Well, some innocent victims of great and painful personal tragedy are worthy of my concern, but not other innocent victims -- the ones I disagree with. They should suffer without any sympathy from me." Way to go, Nazi-in-training.
So, based on your own standard of judgment, other people should shrug off anything horrible that happens to you because of who you are and what you believe. They should be prejudiced, like you. They should say, "Well, I don't agree with him on certain issues, so I'll just let him suffer in horrible pain alone without so much as a kind word from me."
Someone who thinks that way deserves to be passed by and ignored by others in their hour of greatest need.
I mean, fair's fair.

_________________
Christianity is different than Judaism only in people's minds -- not in the Bible.
LePetitPrince wrote:
Ragtime , didn't Jesus teach you to love your enemies?
Yes, and I do love them.
LePetitPrince wrote:
So far, all what I saw from you is deep hatred ,hypocrisy and extreme intolerance.
Well then you're not seeing clearly.
LePetitPrince wrote:
Ragtime, hear me well: F.u.c.k you and F.u.c.k your cult.
I won't debate with you any further because I don't debate with fundamentalist terrorist minds.
I won't debate with you any further because I don't debate with fundamentalist terrorist minds.
Drop your hate, and listen better.
_________________
Christianity is different than Judaism only in people's minds -- not in the Bible.
zendell wrote:
Crusades - Based on what I've read, the crusades were justified. I read that Muslims conquered Christian lands and persecuted and murdered Christians who refused to convert so these weren't innocent people who were killed. If someone attacks you, then you have every right to defend yourself. There's also the sin of omission. If a bunch of people are murdering your family and you stand by and do nothing when you are able to protect them, then I think you would be at least partially responsible for their death.
And also, I'm assuming that all that perished massacre at Beziers were guilty and deserving of death, as well, right?
You know Zendell, back when we were discussing the possible causes of autism I had a lot of respect for you, you seemed somewhat level-headed even though I disagreed with your views. I really would never have known that you're a homophobic religious radical. I mean, Jesus Christ Zendell, you practically advertise that you're "scientific," and then you go quoting Bible prophecies about robot takeovers (yes, I remember) and spouting hateful nonsense.
I'm not mad, just disappointed. I can, however, rest assured that people like you will never be taken seriously, as you are, essentially, a radical extremist nutjob.
_________________
Un-ban Chever! Viva La Revolucion!
richardbenson
Xfractor Card #351

Joined: 30 Oct 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,553
Location: Leave only a footprint behind
Ragtime wrote:
Triangular_Trees wrote:
Quote:
Source?
I'm touched by your concern for the Israeli boy I mentioned. Oh, wait, you didn't show any. While he's bleeding and screaming from re[constructive surgery, you can sit back in your smug satisfaction or indifference -- whichever of those inhuman reactions you prefer.
I'm touched for your concern to make sure the actual facts are gotten out I'mnotaparkeet. At least you didn't put up a title that could incite unwarranted negative feelings towards and options aboutt a particular religion, or branch of religion like "Teen severely maimed, possibly by Orthodox Jews" when as the article clearly states the two groups under suspicioun are Arab terrorists and anti-missionary Orthodox Jews.
The title was entirely accurate, and from what I read, the Orthodox are more suspected at this point than the Palestinians.
Try not to read more into a phrase than is actually there.
The article does not say Orthodox Jews as your title would have everyone think. IT says anti-missionary Orthodox Jews. Putting up a title like yours is no different than my criticizing the Christian church down the street because of what the Wesboro baptists do. The behavior in this article is not condoned by Orthodox Judaism, just as the behavior of the Westboro Baptist church is not condoned by Christianity
In order to have an entirely accurate title, you need to read what is in the article. If you had done that, or even spent a few moments reading my post, you would realize just how ludicrous your title is given the context of the article its introducing.
The ignorance you are showing towards orthodox Jews in your title is the same ignorance that results in good, law abiding, upstanding Muslim community members, and those whose religious attire is similar to Muslims, being attacked and beaten as retribution for the 9/11 attacks
Ragtime wrote:
Israel does not respond to children throwing rocks at tanks by exploding the children, and I seriously, seriously think you must know that.
Untrue. All the armed parties in this conflict have been happy to kill children, either as collateral damage or as deliberately chosen targets. That includes the IDF.
Quote:
The army's indifferent handling of the shootings of civilians has even drawn stinging criticism from a member of Ariel Sharon's Likud party in the Israeli parliament, Michael Eitan. "I am not certain that the responsible officials are aware of the fact that there are gross violations of human rights in the field, despite army regulations," he said.
The case of Khalil al-Mughrabi is telling. The 11-year-old was shot dead in Rafah by the Israeli army two years ago as he played football with a group of friends near the security fence. One of Israel's most respected human rights organisations, B'Tselem, wrote to the judge advocate general's office, responsible for prosecuting soldiers, demanding an inquiry. Months later, the office wrote back saying that Khalil was shot by soldiers who acted with "restraint and control" to disperse a riot in the area. However, the judge advocate general's office made the mistake of attaching a copy of its own, supposedly secret, investigation which came to a quite different conclusion - that the riot had been much earlier in the day and the soldiers who shot the child should not have opened fire. The report says a "serious deviation from obligatory norms of behaviour" took place.
In the report, the chief military prosecutor, Colonel Einat Ron, then spelled out alternative false scenarios that should be offered to B'Tselem. B'Tselem said the internal report confirmed that the army has a policy of covering up its crimes. "The message that the judge advocate general's office transmits to soldiers is clear: soldiers who violate the 'Open Fire Regulations', even if their breach results in death, will not be investigated and will not be prosecuted."
The case of Khalil al-Mughrabi is telling. The 11-year-old was shot dead in Rafah by the Israeli army two years ago as he played football with a group of friends near the security fence. One of Israel's most respected human rights organisations, B'Tselem, wrote to the judge advocate general's office, responsible for prosecuting soldiers, demanding an inquiry. Months later, the office wrote back saying that Khalil was shot by soldiers who acted with "restraint and control" to disperse a riot in the area. However, the judge advocate general's office made the mistake of attaching a copy of its own, supposedly secret, investigation which came to a quite different conclusion - that the riot had been much earlier in the day and the soldiers who shot the child should not have opened fire. The report says a "serious deviation from obligatory norms of behaviour" took place.
In the report, the chief military prosecutor, Colonel Einat Ron, then spelled out alternative false scenarios that should be offered to B'Tselem. B'Tselem said the internal report confirmed that the army has a policy of covering up its crimes. "The message that the judge advocate general's office transmits to soldiers is clear: soldiers who violate the 'Open Fire Regulations', even if their breach results in death, will not be investigated and will not be prosecuted."
Here is the link to the full article.
And another link.
If you are in a position of power and you want to see abuse and murder while not appearing responsible, all you need to do is to protect those who will commit crimes on their own initiative, create a culture of impunity, and so encourage the next abuse. In my eyes, and by the standards established in the war crimes trials after World War II, the people in power are fully responsible for the consequences of turning a blind eye or actively protecting those who commit crimes. The IDF, which claims to be the most moral army in the world, has done just that, and apparently more:
Quote:
Some of the soldiers, who also spoke to the Guardian, say they acted on standing orders in some parts of the Palestinian territories to open fire on people regardless of whether they were armed or not, or posed any physical threat.
That goes beyond just allowing murder to ordering it. Here is the link to the complete article. And another:
Quote:
From a distance of 70 metres and through the sight of his machine gun, Assaf could tell that the Palestinian man was aged between 20 and 30, unarmed and trying to get away from an Israeli tank. But the details didn't matter much, because Assaf's orders were to "fire at anything that moved".
Assaf, a soldier in the Israeli army, pressed the trigger, firing scores of bullets as the body fell to the ground. "He ran and I started shooting for a few seconds. He fell. I was a machine. I fire. I leave and that's that. We never spoke about it afterwards."
It was the summer of 2002, and Assaf and his armoured unit had been ordered to enter the Gaza town of Dir al Balah following the firing of mortars into nearby Jewish settlements. His orders were, he told the Guardian, "'Every person you see on the street, kill him'. And we would just do it."
Assaf, a soldier in the Israeli army, pressed the trigger, firing scores of bullets as the body fell to the ground. "He ran and I started shooting for a few seconds. He fell. I was a machine. I fire. I leave and that's that. We never spoke about it afterwards."
It was the summer of 2002, and Assaf and his armoured unit had been ordered to enter the Gaza town of Dir al Balah following the firing of mortars into nearby Jewish settlements. His orders were, he told the Guardian, "'Every person you see on the street, kill him'. And we would just do it."
Again a link to the full article.
The craziness isn't limited to any one group. Here is a link to an article on Hamas and Fatah drawing children into their struggle for power.
And then there are the settlers who were caught setting a bomb in an Arab school. Look at the last paragraph in the quote for the motive of one guy who helped them.
Quote:
The convicted men - Shlomo Dvir, Yarden Morag and Ofer Gamliel - were caught as they set the timer to detonate a bomb at 7.25am, just as hundreds of pupils were flooding in to class. The judges said many Arab children would have been slaughtered if the attack had not been foiled.
...
Among those detained is Yitzhak Pas, whose 10-month-old daughter, Shalhevet, was shot in the head by a Palestinian sniper as she sat in her pushchair in the highly controversial Jewish settlement in the heart of Hebron and the epicentre of the banned terrorist organisation Kach.
...
Among those detained is Yitzhak Pas, whose 10-month-old daughter, Shalhevet, was shot in the head by a Palestinian sniper as she sat in her pushchair in the highly controversial Jewish settlement in the heart of Hebron and the epicentre of the banned terrorist organisation Kach.
The source of the quote is here
To pretend that any of the armed parties in this conflict are the side of the angels and do not commit atrocities is, at best, misinformed. At worst, it supports the culture of impunity which encourages further crimes.
The bombing victim of your opening post is a victim of the killers of some faction, and it isn't even clear which one. That and the last quote perhaps show that it is the hard men on all sides which are the problem, and it is not a case of "our freedom fighters" and "their terrorists".
Triangular_Trees wrote:
Ragtime wrote:
Triangular_Trees wrote:
Quote:
Source?
I'm touched by your concern for the Israeli boy I mentioned. Oh, wait, you didn't show any. While he's bleeding and screaming from re[constructive surgery, you can sit back in your smug satisfaction or indifference -- whichever of those inhuman reactions you prefer.
I'm touched for your concern to make sure the actual facts are gotten out I'mnotaparkeet. At least you didn't put up a title that could incite unwarranted negative feelings towards and options aboutt a particular religion, or branch of religion like "Teen severely maimed, possibly by Orthodox Jews" when as the article clearly states the two groups under suspicioun are Arab terrorists and anti-missionary Orthodox Jews.
The title was entirely accurate, and from what I read, the Orthodox are more suspected at this point than the Palestinians.
Try not to read more into a phrase than is actually there.
The article does not say Orthodox Jews as your title would have everyone think. IT says anti-missionary Orthodox Jews.
Do you know any Orthodox Jews who aren't anti-missionary?
With some very rare exceptions, all Orthodox Jews oppose proselytizing.
Why do you think there is a law in Israel which basically opposes Christians witnessing to Jews?
_________________
Christianity is different than Judaism only in people's minds -- not in the Bible.
Gromit wrote:
Ragtime wrote:
Israel does not respond to children throwing rocks at tanks by exploding the children, and I seriously, seriously think you must know that.
Untrue. All the armed parties in this conflict have been happy to kill children, either as collateral damage or as deliberately chosen targets. That includes the IDF.
Gromit, you are deluded. That's the most accurate and succinct response to your quote above.
And regarding the rest of your post, I'm sorry that your mind has been deceived into believing The Guardian's either mind-numbingly ignorant or just intentionally dishonest interpretation of events on the ground in Israel. Have you even been to the country? Are you aware that many Palestinians work professionally alongside Israelis day in and day out, and that many are even friends? Those Palestinians know how to disagree with civilized people without employing the use of explosives hidden under clothing.
Please ask former Palestinians Joseph Farah, Ergun Caner (former terrorist), Walid Shoebat (former terrorist), and also award-winning Arab journalists Brigitte Gabriel and Khaled Abu Toameh about what's really going on Israel, before you decide on it simply by picking up the far-removed British Guardian rag each morning.
For your convenience, here is a link to an interview with Khaled Abu Toameh.
_________________
Christianity is different than Judaism only in people's minds -- not in the Bible.
Ragtime wrote:
Triangular_Trees wrote:
Ragtime wrote:
Triangular_Trees wrote:
Quote:
Source?
I'm touched by your concern for the Israeli boy I mentioned. Oh, wait, you didn't show any. While he's bleeding and screaming from re[constructive surgery, you can sit back in your smug satisfaction or indifference -- whichever of those inhuman reactions you prefer.
I'm touched for your concern to make sure the actual facts are gotten out I'mnotaparkeet. At least you didn't put up a title that could incite unwarranted negative feelings towards and options aboutt a particular religion, or branch of religion like "Teen severely maimed, possibly by Orthodox Jews" when as the article clearly states the two groups under suspicioun are Arab terrorists and anti-missionary Orthodox Jews.
The title was entirely accurate, and from what I read, the Orthodox are more suspected at this point than the Palestinians.
Try not to read more into a phrase than is actually there.
The article does not say Orthodox Jews as your title would have everyone think. IT says anti-missionary Orthodox Jews.
Do you know any Orthodox Jews who aren't anti-missionary?
With some very rare exceptions, all Orthodox Jews oppose proselytizing.
Why do you think there is a law in Israel which basically opposes Christians witnessing to Jews?
Yes, I know several. Come to Pittsburgh, I can introduce you to two dozen and I'm sure we can find several others on the street. Not only are showing your own ignorance by claiming all Orthodox Jews are this way you are encouraging that ignorance in others.
If you aren't willing to get the facts, and show the facts you really have no business at all relating news stories to others. There is no value in spreading ignorance. The value lies in spreading knowledge. When you spread false knowledge as you are doing with the title of this thread., you are spreading nothing but ignorance.
Even though i'm sure you could find a good deal of others who know so little about Orthodox Judaism they would say "all orthodox jews are all anti-missionary" the fact that your article explicitly states "anti-missionary" should have been enough to erase that misconception in your mind. After all, if one could assume that all Orthodox jews were anti-missionary there would be no reason to write "anti-missionary" in the article. That would be like writing "Baseball players who play baseball." It doesn't make the remotest bit of sense when any amount of logical or rational thought is applied
Ragtime wrote:
Gromit, you are deluded. That's the most accurate and succinct response to your quote above.
Can you demonstrate a factual error?
Ragtime wrote:
And regarding the rest of your post, I'm sorry that your mind has been deceived into believing The Guardian's either mind-numbingly ignorant or just intentionally dishonest interpretation of events on the ground in Israel.
Do you have any other reason to doubt the quotes besides the source? If you don't, can you show that The Guardian is "mind-numbingly ignorant or just intentionally dishonest"? Did the journalists, for example, misquote the soldiers, or B'Tselem?
Ragtime wrote:
For your convenience, here is a link to an interview with Khaled Abu Toameh.
I read it. I didn't notice anything in conflict with what I wrote or quoted. I didn't notice anything relevant to what I wrote or quoted. The article you linked to is about whether Israeli media censor stories. I didn't write or quote anything about the Israeli media. Would you please explain the connection?
Triangular_Trees wrote:
Ragtime wrote:
Triangular_Trees wrote:
Ragtime wrote:
Triangular_Trees wrote:
Quote:
Source?
I'm touched by your concern for the Israeli boy I mentioned. Oh, wait, you didn't show any. While he's bleeding and screaming from re[constructive surgery, you can sit back in your smug satisfaction or indifference -- whichever of those inhuman reactions you prefer.
I'm touched for your concern to make sure the actual facts are gotten out I'mnotaparkeet. At least you didn't put up a title that could incite unwarranted negative feelings towards and options aboutt a particular religion, or branch of religion like "Teen severely maimed, possibly by Orthodox Jews" when as the article clearly states the two groups under suspicioun are Arab terrorists and anti-missionary Orthodox Jews.
The title was entirely accurate, and from what I read, the Orthodox are more suspected at this point than the Palestinians.
Try not to read more into a phrase than is actually there.
The article does not say Orthodox Jews as your title would have everyone think. IT says anti-missionary Orthodox Jews.
Do you know any Orthodox Jews who aren't anti-missionary?
With some very rare exceptions, all Orthodox Jews oppose proselytizing.
Why do you think there is a law in Israel which basically opposes Christians witnessing to Jews?
Yes, I know several. Come to Pittsburgh, I can introduce you to two dozen and I'm sure we can find several others on the street. Not only are showing your own ignorance by claiming all Orthodox Jews are this way you are encouraging that ignorance in others.
If you aren't willing to get the facts, and show the facts you really have no business at all relating news stories to others. There is no value in spreading ignorance. The value lies in spreading knowledge. When you spread false knowledge as you are doing with the title of this thread., you are spreading nothing but ignorance.
Even though i'm sure you could find a good deal of others who know so little about Orthodox Judaism they would say "all orthodox jews are all anti-missionary" the fact that your article explicitly states "anti-missionary" should have been enough to erase that misconception in your mind. After all, if one could assume that all Orthodox jews were anti-missionary there would be no reason to write "anti-missionary" in the article. That would be like writing "Baseball players who play baseball." It doesn't make the remotest bit of sense when any amount of logical or rational thought is applied
not to mention he's bearing false witness.
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
Possibly Marry and Keep insurance |
15 Jun 2025, 2:24 pm |
Possibly a daft question |
10 Jun 2025, 4:25 pm |
Life Possibly Discovered |
29 Apr 2025, 3:46 am |
Any young teen girls want to be friends? |
13 May 2025, 8:42 am |