slowmutant wrote:
ouinon wrote:
It is not necessary to believe in a historical Christ to believe in Christ as one version/expression of a meaningful spiritual archetype, as present in many ancient mythologies.
What does that even mean? If you don't believe in Jesus as I do, what is your conception of him?
Believing in, and feeling intense gratitude towards, aswell as feeling sorrow about, that which was sacrificed/"willingly sacrificed itself" to save us/enable us/humans to attain new kind of life.
This could/can mean many things. In my own case I felt it/experienced this awareness of being unconditionally loved, and of receiving something as a result of sacrifice, in connection with my body.
An important part of the gnostic mysteries was suppressed by the emerging Christian religion, notably Sophia, who represented knowledge. It is possible that the Jesus archetype, Sophia's brother, originally represented the body, and that its sacrifice was of that physical-mental unity/wholeness which prevented/could not co-exist with certain of our mental powers, ( language, and other symbolic activity on which most cultural and artistic and scientific/technological progress has been based), a sacrifice which needs to be mourned/appreciated, in order to understand how precious, how "expensive" our mental powers are, what they have cost.
And every time we eat and drink is an opportunity to remember, and appreciate what it, and we, lost for "us" to be what we are. And how much it suffers for our "freedom".
That's just my take on it, based on my own experience/"moment of grace". Read Timothy Freke, Peter Gandy, for their take on the ancient gnostic mysteries, and what that religion/spirituality might have meant to people.
.
Last edited by ouinon on 25 Sep 2008, 9:21 am, edited 1 time in total.