Board index › Topical Discussion › Politics, Philosophy, and Religion

Who really caused 9-11?

Page 4 of 5 [ 71 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

Previous topic | Next topic

Who was behind 9-11?
Al-Qaeda 57%  57%  [ 57 ]
The illuminati / global elite / inside job 30%  30%  [ 30 ]
Iraq 2%  2%  [ 2 ]
History_of_psychiatry's butt 11%  11%  [ 11 ]
Total votes : 100

Nambo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Aug 2007
Age: 67
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,882
Location: Prussia

31 Dec 2008, 7:41 pm

Why did you have Al-Quida as a seperate vote from "inside job"?



Orwell
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Aug 2007
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,518
Location: Room 101

31 Dec 2008, 7:45 pm

Nambo wrote:
Why did you have Al-Quida as a seperate vote from "inside job"?

Because Al-Qaeda (learn to spell) is not a US governmental agency.


_________________
WAR IS PEACE
FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH


Nambo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Aug 2007
Age: 67
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,882
Location: Prussia

31 Dec 2008, 7:48 pm

pakled wrote:
Bin Laden, like Homer, was not responsible for their contributions; they were done by others of the same name...;)

Nah, the thing about the internal explosions was covered in the book. In order to effectively explosively sever the support columns, they'd have to move in about a dozen tons of HE, scrape the insulation off, which would take experts weeks (because they went and talked to the experts).

I think something like that would be noticed....


Something like that was noticed, for a few weeks before, they where suppossedly changing the computer wiring or something, after they where finished, the guy who ran the security company, who just happens to be George Bushes brother, wouldnt allow bomb sniffer dogs in.

There is a film where a couple of the residents who survived said that every morning they would go to thier offices, and find a thick layer of building dust over everything.

Yes it was noticed.

Dont forget building 7 as well, no plane hit that so it had to come down with explosives, they would have been fitted in the same way as for the twin towers.

[youtube]http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=3xFROg3YbAM[/youtube]



Orwell
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Aug 2007
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,518
Location: Room 101

31 Dec 2008, 7:51 pm

Nambo wrote:
Dont forget building 7 as well, no plane hit that so it had to come down with explosives, they would have been fitted in the same way as for the twin towers.

Do you mean that there are only two ways for a building to collapse, namely being hit by a plane or being rigged with explosives?

Somehow I doubt your line of reasoning.


_________________
WAR IS PEACE
FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH


Nambo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Aug 2007
Age: 67
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,882
Location: Prussia

31 Dec 2008, 7:56 pm

Orwell wrote:
Nambo wrote:
Why did you have Al-Quida as a seperate vote from "inside job"?

Because Al-Qaeda (learn to spell) is not a US governmental agency.


I triey to learn to spell, but I was rubbish at sckool

Anyway, Al-Qaida (maybe you should learn as well), is a CIA assett.
Havnt you seen the BBC documentaries showing how it was manufactured by the CIA?
Didnt you hear Robin Cooks fine speach to the House of Commons just before he was assasinated where he was trying to talk the Commons out of voting for the Iraq war, because, he said, Al-Qaida was nothing more than a CIA data base.

Heres a start for your research http://aperspective.newsvine.com/_news/ ... e-russians



Orwell
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Aug 2007
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,518
Location: Room 101

31 Dec 2008, 8:01 pm

Nambo wrote:
Anyway, Al-Qaida (maybe you should learn as well), is a CIA assett.
Havnt you seen the BBC documentaries showing how it was manufactured by the CIA?

Funding a dodgy group because they are fighting against your enemy is rather different than "manufacturing" them. I live in the United States and don't generally watch any television, so no, I have not seen the BBC documentaries; however, I would be rather skeptical of any TV-based source.


_________________
WAR IS PEACE
FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH


Nambo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Aug 2007
Age: 67
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,882
Location: Prussia

31 Dec 2008, 8:03 pm

Orwell wrote:
Nambo wrote:
Dont forget building 7 as well, no plane hit that so it had to come down with explosives, they would have been fitted in the same way as for the twin towers.

Do you mean that there are only two ways for a building to collapse, namely being hit by a plane or being rigged with explosives?

Somehow I doubt your line of reasoning.


I didnt say there are only two ways, there are many ways, Earthquake, have to be a very big one and a localised one to have brought down the Soloman building.

We can discount fire, see the YouTube link I provided.

Missiles, (I didnt see any of them).

Faulty workmanship and materials. (not so common in America I think).

Giant tidal wave.

Godzilla,

Take your pick and let me know.

Heres something interesting.
BBC and CNN knew it was going to fall down as soon as they got the days script,
[youtube]http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=C7SwOT29gbc[/youtube]



Orwell
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Aug 2007
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,518
Location: Room 101

31 Dec 2008, 8:10 pm

Youtube videos are not a credible source.

How about the poor foundation the building was founded on, combined with the damage sustained by the seismic effects of the first two collapses? Perhaps along with a bit of faulty workmanship/materials, which are more common than you might think.


_________________
WAR IS PEACE
FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH


Laconvivencia
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Dec 2008
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,333

31 Dec 2008, 8:39 pm

Prince Philip is behind the 9/11



Image



Orwell
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Aug 2007
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,518
Location: Room 101

01 Jan 2009, 2:45 pm

No, Laconvivencia. As I have already stated in this thread, I am in fact solely responsible for the 9/11 attacks. Some fringe lunatics would have you believe that at the time I was eleven years old and in English class... but that's just what they *want* you to think.


_________________
WAR IS PEACE
FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH


Laconvivencia
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Dec 2008
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,333

01 Jan 2009, 3:05 pm

Orwell maybe you work for Prince Philip



Laconvivencia
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Dec 2008
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,333

02 Jan 2009, 3:48 pm

All what i know, Prince Philip is the mastermind behind the 9/11



Orwell
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Aug 2007
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,518
Location: Room 101

02 Jan 2009, 8:20 pm

That's what I want you to think.


_________________
WAR IS PEACE
FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH


history_of_psychiatry
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Dec 2006
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,105
Location: X

02 Jan 2009, 8:28 pm

I still stand by the claim that it was my butt that in fact caused 9-11.


_________________
X


ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 89
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

03 Jan 2009, 11:06 am

history_of_psychiatry wrote:
I personally think the global elite was the cause behind the 9-11 attacks. They had too much to gain from them. Of course you can all scoff at my "conspiracy theories".


I scoff at your conspiracy theories. Usama bin Laden took credit for it. I take him at his word. And how do you suppose the Bilderbergers got the likes of Mohammed Atta to commit suicide?

ruveyn



Nambo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Aug 2007
Age: 67
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,882
Location: Prussia

03 Jan 2009, 7:06 pm

ruveyn wrote:
I scoff at your conspiracy theories. Usama bin Laden took credit for it. I take him at his word. And how do you suppose the Bilderbergers got the likes of Mohammed Atta to commit suicide?

ruveyn


Bin Laden didnt take credit for it, Bin Laden said that no Muslim would kill innocent Women and Children as they would burn in hell forever for it, if you read the Koran you would see why no Muslim would ever do such a thing as thier idea of Hell is a pretty horrible place.

What you are talking about is the video the Americans just happened to find in a cave somewhere in Afganistan, it shows a man with a big nose, unlike Bin Laden who has a thin nose, its hows a man writing with his right hand unlike Bin Laden who is left handed and it is claimed he is admitting to doing 911 though German Arabic translators claimit had been mistranslated.