Does President Bush Deserve a Shoe in the Face?

Page 4 of 4 [ 56 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4


Does President Bush Deserve a Shoe in the Face?
Yes 79%  79%  [ 42 ]
No 21%  21%  [ 11 ]
Total votes : 53

MissConstrue
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Feb 2008
Gender: Female
Posts: 17,055
Location: MO

20 Dec 2008, 7:36 am

He broke the Geneva Convention, which makes him no different from Hitler.

If this crime can be exempted then we're in trouble. I'm shocked at how this event was sweeped under the rug like nothing.

That's one of many examples why Bush deserves a shoe in the face. He has no right to justify an immunity against the crime that was commited at the Abu Ghraib prison.


_________________
I live as I choose or I will not live at all.
~Delores O’Riordan


Macbeth
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 May 2007
Age: 48
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,984
Location: UK Doncaster

20 Dec 2008, 7:47 am

techstepgenr8tion wrote:
Barracuda wrote:
So I shouldn't have said anything? Yeah, I thought so.

I'm probably leaving this discussion after this but I'd thought I'd post what Bush should have done. But you know what? I think He loved the country a little too much to let Pelosi send it to hell.


50 or 100 years from now when all the vitriol and sore election losing dies down people will look back, see how events unfolded, and have absolutely no clue whatsoever on how this guy was so hated during his administration. If anything they'll likely be horrified that public rationale and common sense of any sort of reality, in our country, peeled from the wall so badly that people were leading with their hate and clinging to any bit of smut that they could that smeared the guy and gave them some relief. Then again I suppose I'd liken the scenario to soldiers coming back from Vietnam and being spit on by a bunch of hippies calling them baby killers (the thought of that now even makes me gag).

I would like to think that we'll figure out, in due time, what the 'left' is. Otherwise, we may have history books burning in the streets in favor of something rewritten to a worldview that's more doctrine oriented to communism, fascism, or whichever direction it is that they want to go in.


Veterans of unpopular wars often receive vitriol from the public. At least in THIS unpopular war, the vitriol is being aimed at the people actually responsible... those who call the shots, not those who do the shooting.


_________________
"There is a time when the operation of the machine becomes so odious, makes you so sick at heart,
that you can't take part" [Mario Savo, 1964]


techstepgenr8tion
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Feb 2005
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 24,695
Location: 28th Path of Tzaddi

20 Dec 2008, 8:55 am

Macbeth wrote:
Veterans of unpopular wars often receive vitriol from the public. At least in THIS unpopular war, the vitriol is being aimed at the people actually responsible... those who call the shots, not those who do the shooting.


I have to agree that is a big improvement.

On the other hand when we look at the idea that the intelligence for Iraq came from even more middle-eastern countries than western it provides a much different picture than the 'Bush lied people died' proponents are willing to admit. What's most important about the U.S.'s haggling with the UN pre-war and the UN's refusal to let us go in is that they all believed that we were correct in our assertion that Iraq had WMD's, something that the same BLPD people say was only a product of Powell's brainwashing - somehow I can't imagine politically savvy delegates from all over the world having contrary opinions being completely overturned by a semi-charismatic Powell. Some authors such as Kenneth Timmerman (ie. Shadow Warriors) have made allegations that our own CIA, after the 2000 election, had a great many appointees by Clinton and earlier by Carter who already hated Bush for stealing the election and even tried to set him up through all of this; I don't know how much of that I believe to be true, but I can say that there was either a definite short-circuit in intelligence all around the globe or alternatively its just as well that the WMD's could have been destroyed or moved to Syria in anticipation of US invasion, we did give Saddam quite a while on that.

What disgusts me about what's going on here is that there's no intellectual honesty in this conversation. People aren't arguing even valid points so much as trying to sheerly scorn-out counter arguments, set up a de facto reality, and say that if you don't buy into the idea that its all about oil (or a Christian war on Islam) and that we're an imperialist country that your somehow just deaf, dumb, ret*d, not worthy of listening to. That's not greatness and clarity, its the self-sheltered mind. In turn, given the a priori that the U.S. is the leader in world atrocities and pillaging of resources, this stops being any kind of real conversation and starts being an ego circle-jerk - something where ironically I find fewer NT's who are this self-righteous (and I think pro-rata that they know how much they don't know, haven't been brought up on the fantasy that they're any sort of misunderstood super-geniuses, it makes me think that psychologists as well need to reassess their diagnosis and fables about AS to just say that we're wired differently in our intake and learning but in every other way are dead-aim normal and not the least bit more 'special' than the next person, otherwise the results are rather gross).



sartresue
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Age: 71
Gender: Female
Posts: 6,313
Location: The Castle of Shock and Awe-tism

20 Dec 2008, 9:33 am

slowmutant wrote:
Quote:
he just made himself look really really bad doing that to the president of the US


It was a symbolic act of aggression towards the Unites States, was it not? Our Canadian politicians are much more likely to receive a pie in the face than anything else. I can't think of a single Canadian politician who's had an attempt made on his life.


Did you forget the Chretien episode? topic

Jean fought back, with a streetsmart choke hold. :P

There have been other attempts at Canadian politicians in history, though perhaps not on the scale of Lincoln, the Kennedys or religious leader Martin Luther King. Check out the history of the 1837 Rebellion in Upper Canada and you might be surprised.


_________________
Radiant Aspergian
Awe-Tistic Whirlwind

Phuture Phounder of the Philosophy Phactory

NOT a believer of Mystic Woo-Woo


sartresue
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Age: 71
Gender: Female
Posts: 6,313
Location: The Castle of Shock and Awe-tism

20 Dec 2008, 9:35 am

Bootin' Bush Game topic

I knew game theory would come through. Better than darts. :lol:


_________________
Radiant Aspergian
Awe-Tistic Whirlwind

Phuture Phounder of the Philosophy Phactory

NOT a believer of Mystic Woo-Woo


lucy1
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 16 Aug 2007
Age: 70
Gender: Female
Posts: 316

20 Dec 2008, 4:13 pm

techstepgenr8tion wrote:
50 or 100 years from now when all the vitriol and sore election losing dies down people will look back, see how events unfolded, and have absolutely no clue whatsoever on how this guy was so hated during his administration. If anything they'll likely be horrified that public rationale and common sense of any sort of reality, in our country, peeled from the wall so badly that people were leading with their hate and clinging to any bit of smut that they could that smeared the guy and gave them some relief. Then again I suppose I'd liken the scenario to soldiers coming back from Vietnam and being spit on by a bunch of hippies calling them baby killers (the thought of that now even makes me gag).

I would like to think that we'll figure out, in due time, what the 'left' is. Otherwise, we may have history books burning in the streets in favor of something rewritten to a worldview that's more doctrine oriented to communism, fascism, or whichever direction it is that they want to go in.


Good post.

Bush must have had enough support from the people to become President, maybe we could throw stones or shoes at the people who helped to put him into power.



techstepgenr8tion
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Feb 2005
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 24,695
Location: 28th Path of Tzaddi

20 Dec 2008, 6:00 pm

lucy1 wrote:
Bush must have had enough support from the people to become President, maybe we could throw stones or shoes at the people who helped to put him into power.


If someone does take that idea literally I do hope they're a lot bigger than I am - for their sake.



richardbenson
Xfractor Card #351
Xfractor Card #351

User avatar

Joined: 30 Oct 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,553
Location: Leave only a footprint behind

21 Dec 2008, 2:39 pm

skafather84 wrote:
Image
oh good lord how did i miss this? hilarious. :lol:


_________________
Winds of clarity. a universal understanding come and go, I've seen though the Darkness to understand the bounty of Light