Orwell wrote:
Dussel wrote:
I would be not that certain that Europe would collapse quicker. European societies have more experience with a collapse than the US.
This is actually kind of why I would assume Europe would fall faster. It's been a while since Europe managed to remain stable for prolonged periods of time.
The structures in Europe perhaps are more robust (or just better tested). An extreme example you can see in Germany in Feb. to Jun. 1945. Even most of the infrastructure was broken down and it was not clear how is the German government or even is there one, the administration did their job: Birth and marriage certificates were issued (the father of a friend of mine married on 08 May 1945), the rail tried to run as much service as possible, if possible mail was transported, banks were open, so far possible, etc. pp.
Even in this extreme situation with fighting in the country, a total collapse of the central government, occupational forces still not really exercising their power in all places, the country did not collapse. The framework of administration and running services was still maintained by the local bureaucracy.
They did the same what their French or Netherlands colleagues did some years earlier and what generations of civil servants in Europe did over the centuries: Keeping the machinery running, regardless how is now the "big boss".