Homosexuality

Post Reply New Topic

What if the afterlife turns out to be completely different from what is described in the Bible?

it's boring cause you cant deduce the value in the questions being asked of you... or you're above them and then ignore them...as you have stated

you exude these things... and yes you have stated you blatantly ignore questions and such cause "you're free" of them... aka.. above them

You ASSUME there's no logical reason. But you're not the Lord of Logic (hate to break it to you). There are some things you and I just don't know, which are true nonetheless. Just because you can't understand something doesn't mean it's illogical.

The only thing I don't understand is how the hell intelligent people manage to believe this BS in 2007.
The point is, you don't know of any logical reason, so why do you still blindly follow it?

Of course I asked why. I'm still curious, as a matter of fact, why penises can't just screw vaginas and be done with the whole debate. I mean, does a gay man really find women disgusting? Does it mean NOTHING to him that his penis fits perfectly and pleasurably into a woman's vagina? Seriously -- men can feel attracted to other men, but penises still have the same pleasure nerves. Therefore, how could a vagina "feel bad" to a gay man's penis? It's impossible. Therefore, it has more to do with the emotional relations of that person -- but why would the gender alone of a person you like determine your purely-emotional love for them? So, I've proved the sexual issue isn't a problem, and I've proved the emotional issue isn't a problem. So what's the problem?

Then I'll be f***ed. Just make sure you're not.

Look, most guys could f**k another male.
Doesn't mean that they'd enjoy it.

It's not an issue of physical capability here.

Oh, I "exude" them, do I? More ironclad evidence for your positions, I see.

In the same way we dont allow consentual paedophillia in this country, because people dont like the concept. Most laws are based on pragmatism, get used to it. Like the Blasphemy act, for instance. Voicing your opinion is all fair enough, but there are ways of doing so diplomatically, and also without you going into some online rage about it. As for other peoples rights yes I care, but being able to bugger someone up the arse doesnt count very high up my list of priortities, funilly enough.

The Bible does disapprove of homosexuality quite explicitly. It's right there in Leviticus:

Leviticus 18.22: Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination.

(Doesn't say anything about lesbianism, curiously enough)

As are some other strictures. Let's have a look at some of them.

Leviticus 3.17: It shall be a perpetual statute for your generations throughout all your dwellings, that ye eat neither fat nor blood.

Leviticus 12.2: Speak unto the children of Israel, saying, If a woman have conceived seed, and born a man child: then she shall be unclean seven days; according to the days of the separation for her infirmity shall she be unclean.

Leviticus 19.19 Ye shall keep my statutes. Thou shalt not let thy cattle gender with a diverse kind: thou shalt not sow thy field with mingled seed: neither shall a garment mingled of linen and woollen come upon thee.

Leviticus 19.23 And when ye shall come into the land, and shall have planted all manner of trees for food, then ye shall count the fruit thereof as uncircumcised: three years shall it be as uncircumcised unto you: it shall not be eaten of.

Leviticus 20.9 For every one that curseth his father or his mother shall be surely put to death: he hath cursed his father or his mother; his blood shall be upon him.

Leviticus 20.10 And the man that committeth adultery with another man's wife, even he that committeth adultery with his neighbour's wife, the adulterer and the adulteress shall surely be put to death.

Leviticus 20.18 And if a man shall lie with a woman having her sickness, and shall uncover her nakedness; he hath discovered her fountain, and she hath uncovered the fountain of her blood: and both of them shall be cut off from among their people.

Funny that the "homosexuality is bad" one got kept out of that lot. It's almost as if the Bible was being selectively read to justify prejudice.

if you had proved anything... yo'd be a very rich man

it's not the nerves in the penis or clit that matter... it's the brain. and im sorry... i dont buy your little experiment

along these lines... you cold conclude that a woman would draw pleasure from being raped. do you concur?



if you did ask... then answer the why.... beyond god "saying so"

i would put a poll if it werent against TOS

Because they're not attracted to them. You have a prostate don't you? I'm sure you could find it pleasurable to get f****d up your ass by a man. But you're straight, so you wouldn't do it. I could have asex with a man, but I wouldn't want to. I don't find men repulsive at all, but the thought of having sex with one repulses me, just like the thought of having sex with a fat ugly woman repulses me. It's the same for everyone else.

It depends if their penises explode up the other blokes rectums...

lol