Column: Larry Elder is the Black face of white supremacy.
Mr Reynholm wrote:
cyberdad wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Most liberals reject such a notion as open borders.
Does any liberal actually want teeming masses to enter without any form of border control?? Sounds like the usual bollocks
Apparently the US government does.
They don't.
They are simply inept at handling the influx.
Mr Reynholm wrote:
DW_a_mom wrote:
Mr Reynholm wrote:
cyberdad wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Most liberals reject such a notion as open borders.
Does any liberal actually want teeming masses to enter without any form of border control?? Sounds like the usual bollocks
Apparently the US government does.
Then why are they deporting so many?
They probably have their reasons. But leaving the boarder wide open to anyone is a terrible risk. We don't know who is crossing or what they may be bringing with them.
I have heard it mentioned that they favour immigrants who would probably vote Democrat.
Assuming this is True.
The same thing happened in Australia under Paul Keating.
Kraichgauer wrote:
DW_a_mom wrote:
Mr Reynholm wrote:
DW_a_mom wrote:
Mr Reynholm wrote:
cyberdad wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Most liberals reject such a notion as open borders.
Does any liberal actually want teeming masses to enter without any form of border control?? Sounds like the usual bollocks
Apparently the US government does.
Then why are they deporting so many?
They probably have their reasons. But leaving the boarder wide open to anyone is a terrible risk. We don't know who is crossing or what they may be bringing with them.
I think it is incorrect to believe the border has suddenly been left wide open.
I'm absolutely certain you're correct.
Harris purportedly went "down south" to plead with people not to journey to America.
They didn't listen, obviously.
Pepe wrote:
Mr Reynholm wrote:
DW_a_mom wrote:
Mr Reynholm wrote:
cyberdad wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Most liberals reject such a notion as open borders.
Does any liberal actually want teeming masses to enter without any form of border control?? Sounds like the usual bollocks
Apparently the US government does.
Then why are they deporting so many?
They probably have their reasons. But leaving the boarder wide open to anyone is a terrible risk. We don't know who is crossing or what they may be bringing with them.
I have heard it mentioned that they favour immigrants who would probably vote Democrat.
Assuming this is True.
The same thing happened in Australia under Paul Keating.
Except they aren't allowed to vote until (big if) they become citizens.
The border isn't wide open.
We still have border patrol.
They've been trying to ease up on a limited number of vulnerable refugee populations (mostly children, if I recall), allowing them in to start processing their claims from inside the US, but the numbers being admitted remain historically low. So low Biden is getting heat for it.
_________________
Mom to an amazing young adult AS son, plus an also amazing non-AS daughter. Most likely part of the "Broader Autism Phenotype" (some traits).
Last edited by DW_a_mom on 07 Oct 2021, 8:51 am, edited 1 time in total.
Brictoria wrote:
Mr Reynholm wrote:
Why are black conservatives so passionately hated that it warrants racial attacks against them?
Punishment for not obeying their "masters" on the left, and to "encourage" others not to follow their lead?
These are unsubstantiated partisan claims. Which is amusing, given how snide you like to be accusing others of being overly partisan.
_________________
Mom to an amazing young adult AS son, plus an also amazing non-AS daughter. Most likely part of the "Broader Autism Phenotype" (some traits).
DW_a_mom wrote:
Pepe wrote:
Mr Reynholm wrote:
DW_a_mom wrote:
Mr Reynholm wrote:
cyberdad wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Most liberals reject such a notion as open borders.
Does any liberal actually want teeming masses to enter without any form of border control?? Sounds like the usual bollocks
Apparently the US government does.
Then why are they deporting so many?
They probably have their reasons. But leaving the boarder wide open to anyone is a terrible risk. We don't know who is crossing or what they may be bringing with them.
I have heard it mentioned that they favour immigrants who would probably vote Democrat.
Assuming this is True.
The same thing happened in Australia under Paul Keating.
Except they aren't allowed to vote until (big if) they become citizens.
The border isn't wide open.
We still have border patrol.
They've been trying to ease up on a limited number of vulnerable refugee populations (mostly children, if I recall), allowing them in to start processing their claims from inside the US, but the numbers being admitted remain historically low. So low Biden is getting heat for it.
They can't vote legally, but in states where voter ID has been deemed "racist" anyone can vote. This is about the long game anyway. Even if this generation doesn't vote the new US citizens produced are expected to vote appropriately.
Mr Reynholm wrote:
DW_a_mom wrote:
Pepe wrote:
Mr Reynholm wrote:
DW_a_mom wrote:
Mr Reynholm wrote:
cyberdad wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Most liberals reject such a notion as open borders.
Does any liberal actually want teeming masses to enter without any form of border control?? Sounds like the usual bollocks
Apparently the US government does.
Then why are they deporting so many?
They probably have their reasons. But leaving the boarder wide open to anyone is a terrible risk. We don't know who is crossing or what they may be bringing with them.
I have heard it mentioned that they favour immigrants who would probably vote Democrat.
Assuming this is True.
The same thing happened in Australia under Paul Keating.
Except they aren't allowed to vote until (big if) they become citizens.
The border isn't wide open.
We still have border patrol.
They've been trying to ease up on a limited number of vulnerable refugee populations (mostly children, if I recall), allowing them in to start processing their claims from inside the US, but the numbers being admitted remain historically low. So low Biden is getting heat for it.
They can't vote legally, but in states where voter ID has been deemed "racist" anyone can vote. This is about the long game anyway. Even if this generation doesn't vote the new US citizens produced are expected to vote appropriately.
When they do, they get caught and prosecuted. It is extremely, EXTREMELY rare. So rare as to be insignificant.
Voter registration is the time for eligibility verification, not showing an ID on voting day. We don't have to show ID, but we DO have to give our name and sign in. Our signatures are on record. It all gets verified. Voter ID sounds good but isn't needed.
_________________
Mom to an amazing young adult AS son, plus an also amazing non-AS daughter. Most likely part of the "Broader Autism Phenotype" (some traits).
DW_a_mom wrote:
Mr Reynholm wrote:
DW_a_mom wrote:
Pepe wrote:
Mr Reynholm wrote:
DW_a_mom wrote:
Mr Reynholm wrote:
cyberdad wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Most liberals reject such a notion as open borders.
Does any liberal actually want teeming masses to enter without any form of border control?? Sounds like the usual bollocks
Apparently the US government does.
Then why are they deporting so many?
They probably have their reasons. But leaving the boarder wide open to anyone is a terrible risk. We don't know who is crossing or what they may be bringing with them.
I have heard it mentioned that they favour immigrants who would probably vote Democrat.
Assuming this is True.
The same thing happened in Australia under Paul Keating.
Except they aren't allowed to vote until (big if) they become citizens.
The border isn't wide open.
We still have border patrol.
They've been trying to ease up on a limited number of vulnerable refugee populations (mostly children, if I recall), allowing them in to start processing their claims from inside the US, but the numbers being admitted remain historically low. So low Biden is getting heat for it.
They can't vote legally, but in states where voter ID has been deemed "racist" anyone can vote. This is about the long game anyway. Even if this generation doesn't vote the new US citizens produced are expected to vote appropriately.
When they do, they get caught and prosecuted. It is extremely, EXTREMELY rare. So rare as to be insignificant.
Voter registration is the time for eligibility verification, not showing an ID on voting day. We don't have to show ID, but we DO have to give our name and sign in. Our signatures are on record. It all gets verified. Voter ID sounds good but isn't needed.
We will have to agree to disagree on this matter.
Kraichgauer
Veteran
Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,751
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
Mr Reynholm wrote:
DW_a_mom wrote:
Mr Reynholm wrote:
DW_a_mom wrote:
Pepe wrote:
Mr Reynholm wrote:
DW_a_mom wrote:
Mr Reynholm wrote:
cyberdad wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Most liberals reject such a notion as open borders.
Does any liberal actually want teeming masses to enter without any form of border control?? Sounds like the usual bollocks
Apparently the US government does.
Then why are they deporting so many?
They probably have their reasons. But leaving the boarder wide open to anyone is a terrible risk. We don't know who is crossing or what they may be bringing with them.
I have heard it mentioned that they favour immigrants who would probably vote Democrat.
Assuming this is True.
The same thing happened in Australia under Paul Keating.
Except they aren't allowed to vote until (big if) they become citizens.
The border isn't wide open.
We still have border patrol.
They've been trying to ease up on a limited number of vulnerable refugee populations (mostly children, if I recall), allowing them in to start processing their claims from inside the US, but the numbers being admitted remain historically low. So low Biden is getting heat for it.
They can't vote legally, but in states where voter ID has been deemed "racist" anyone can vote. This is about the long game anyway. Even if this generation doesn't vote the new US citizens produced are expected to vote appropriately.
When they do, they get caught and prosecuted. It is extremely, EXTREMELY rare. So rare as to be insignificant.
Voter registration is the time for eligibility verification, not showing an ID on voting day. We don't have to show ID, but we DO have to give our name and sign in. Our signatures are on record. It all gets verified. Voter ID sounds good but isn't needed.
We will have to agree to disagree on this matter.
You can disagree, but Mom is still right. The notion that there is massive voter fraud is a lie peddled by the right to achieve voter suppression. Isn't it odd to you that it's primarily non-whites who end up finding it harder to vote?
By the way, of those few cases where voter fraud had been discovered, it had been perpetrated by white conservatives. YEAH!
_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
auntblabby
Veteran
Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 115,252
Location: the island of defective toy santas
Kraichgauer
Veteran
Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,751
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
Mr Reynholm wrote:
We will have to agree to disagree on this matter.
Larry Elder (or any PoC) is welcome to join the republican party. He is a social conservative and that's his business, Nobody has anything bad to say about Clarence Thomas, Ben Carson, Condaleeza rice or Colin Powell either choosing to be republicans.
However, unlike the other aforementioned black republicans who have made names for themselves as outstanding individuals in the supreme court, medicine, military and foreign affairs; Elder is largely an internet troll who seems to gain popularity from shocking his radio and online audiences with inflammatory attacks against progressives.
Instead of building any sort value from the years he spent in law, he spends an inordinate amount of his time on radio attacking the BLM movement, affirmative action, slavery and other causes the black community champion. A simple google search will illustrate he is not popular in the wider community he is part of.
cyberdad wrote:
Mr Reynholm wrote:
We will have to agree to disagree on this matter.
Larry Elder (or any PoC) is welcome to join the republican party. He is a social conservative and that's his business, Nobody has anything bad to say about Clarence Thomas, Ben Carson, Condaleeza rice or Colin Powell either choosing to be republicans.
However, unlike the other aforementioned black republicans who have made names for themselves as outstanding individuals in the supreme court, medicine, military and foreign affairs; Elder is largely an internet troll who seems to gain popularity from shocking his radio and online audiences with inflammatory attacks against progressives.
Instead of building any sort value from the years he spent in law, he spends an inordinate amount of his time on radio attacking the BLM movement, affirmative action, slavery and other causes the black community champion. A simple google search will illustrate he is not popular in the wider community he is part of.
I think the "agree to disagree" was more on the voting tangent, just FYI.
The racism questions with respect to Elder I felt were already covered earlier in the thread and I did not have anything new to add beyond what I've already said.
_________________
Mom to an amazing young adult AS son, plus an also amazing non-AS daughter. Most likely part of the "Broader Autism Phenotype" (some traits).
