Dox47 wrote:
magz wrote:
I have not seen any serious proposals to send military against private gun owners.
The serious proposals I have seen were about restricting the market to make new purchases more limited and controlled.
It's a common argument, it comes up nearly every time someone mentions the "check on the government" aspect of civilian gun ownership, and it's always stupid to anyone even slightly familiar with 20th century asymmetric warfare.
I don't really know what you are talking about, probably because I'm not from USA.
Everywhere else in the civilized world, private gun ownership is - to various degrees - limited and regulated, so we're not talking about some abstract revolutional ideas leading to Great Unknown. Come and see what life looks like in these states.
On "checking your government" - this is exactly the argument of the "liberal" from the meme: if you think you can "check your government" with your AR-15, remember your government has HIMARS systems and fighter jets. It won't work this way.
Mechanisms for checking on the governments include voting, public investigations, independent courts, right to achieve public information, right to peaceful protests, trade unions and other assemblies, NGOs, freedom of press, freedom of speech and sharing information and several other mechanisms.
Check this out, the whole 1989 revolution here happened without shooting a single shot.
_________________
Let's not confuse being normal with being mentally healthy.
<not moderating PPR stuff concerning East Europe>