Jacoby wrote:
The best advocacy group for gun manufacturers are the gun grabbers themselves, the NRA really is only as powerful as it's membership and its really not all that influential on lawmakers so much as the fear backlash from the voters. Gun violence has been going down for decades while gun ownership has skyrocketed.
You have a tendency to make posts that contain no correct statements. Gun ownership hasn't skyrocketed. There are less people who own guns now than in the past. Gun sales are going up because paranoid gun owners ate building stockpiles on the fear that Obama's going to take them. The NRA is incredibly influential on republics politicians. If they weren't there would have been a vote in the house.
The only thing your right about is we've had a decrease in gun violence. But violence in general is also decreasing. And that just goes to show how bad this problem is. We've had a steady decline in violence and yet there were still 52 people who in Chicago over father's day weekend. It's not always gang members shot either. Just recently a little girl was shot in the back while she played in the front yard, also in Chicago. There were 125 gun deaths in the week following Orlando. Japan on the other hand will usually have their numbers in the single digits over the course of a year. Now I'm not saying we should become Japan, but how do you square that with the idea that even if guns are illegal criminals will still get them?
The idea that more guns equals more safety is a perfect example of cognitive dissonance.