Why the drug war is a legitimate war against terrorism

Post Reply New Topic

Well since this conversation is more about me then the issue. I suspect that’s because you disagree and would rather focus the attention on me then the issue.

Screw loose is a terminology I use when exaggerated and clearly delusional things are said. It’s not a direct insult; it's a saying because the information was rhetoric filled and clearly anti-government. It’s typical of the paranoid delusional but I did not say that, I said screw loose, but still I did not say he has a screw loose or "you have a screw loose" to him. I made sure of it.

Sort of a phrase used that is political in contact as to counter what was said, I know he must listen or read that type of junk and might actually believe it. Perfectly within my rights to counter some of the ridiculous statements for a constructive conversation, which were not fact based. Fact was used but interpreted without balance, also he and I disagree on only certan things.

To think drugs should be legalized without doctors prescription to me is inane, having a screw loose. It’s like saying let’s allow everyone to allow guns in school, because its your right to bare arms and your right to protect yourself against others with guns. When society allows street drugs to be legalized such as M.J with how readily it can be produced in great amounts by an individual is the day I find another country to live in.

If you believe M.J should be legalized other then medical use from an authorized and qualifying doctor you have a screw loose. I could say your a crazy moron who has sold your soul out to a fictional devil as well as future generations.

The goal was to make sure his perspective like in any legitimate debate or discussions contain fact. It was concerning many topics in one, not the specific topic at hand.

So in other interpretations of trolling, I could say he was a troll. Its how stupid trolling policy is, it’s contradictive to freedom of expression which cannot really be disallowed and still said to be freedom.


As far as trolling yes I would fit my description because I include myself to be fair and balanced (I commonly change myself for self-improvement), but not in the harsher sense of trolling like calling him an insane loon. Trolling as a policy in my interpretations would end all of this nonsense and result in truly constructive conversation of balance in pure logic and facts. So it is only fair that I would describe myself.

I've been instigated in several posts with personal insults, character attacks and just out right disrespect since I posted here by a few.

You cannot expect me to just feel good about the people who have followed me around in several posts just starting conflict.

The previous poster before you if you notice his post in my other topic, The God Archetype was proper and constructive.

Also Screw Loose matches well with a character name in the book I am working on called The Evans Experiment, Jack Philips... It is a pun. Also jack as in a car jack, philips for a screw driver and screw driver for a wrestling move, also screw loose listen to me and I’ll make sure its screwed in, for proper and logical understandings, not delusional propagandas that make the good guys into bad guys.

Both times me being banned was for direct affiliations with the group owners.. Not my actions on forums..

I knew and interacted regularly with the owners of A.F.F and A.I. You have no idea... We will keep it at that because to explain it all would have to bring out personal facts about them I do not want to say. Besides it's no ones business, your using that to simply frame me as someone who intends trouble..

Some just hate me because I'm too good.. I practice being a model citizen, but I refuse to comb my hair.

The drug war supports terrorisme, and other illegal activities actually!

(sorry if this has already been said, I really do not have the time or energy to wade through the whole thread).

It keeps the prices incredibly high, and so makes it easy to make loads of money out of drugs by terrorists and (other) criminals.

True...

I am actually preparing a writing about something like that.. Its unfortunate, yet we both are thinking sort of similarly..

Hi sc,

nice to hear you agree on that. The title of the thread made me think you would react different.

Succes with the writing about it then

Am I trolling Who cares I don't care though I don't troll in the end. Everybody that thinks whatever about any thing and yet has truly nothing to say for this is what this site is becoming with truly nothing to say or believe in. This site has become to Leftwing for it on good. I am getting tried of this site in more ways that I can see. Will this site yet growup in the end or not in the end. Be glad I am to nice for You all. Though this is why this site has become number two on My list in the end. Troll all You Want.

I've seen how this stuff works for more than twenty years. The only thing that is going to allow people to grow large masses of marijuana for oil production will be total legalization. "They" will never allow a distinction to be made between industrial hemp and marijuana, so we might as well have blanket legalization, which I far prefer to being unable to run my car or heat my house. When it comes to being able to drive to work or heat my home, I don't care whether someone sneaks into the field at night and rolls a few leaves of pretty much worthless smoke. They'll try it a couple of times and go back to making their own, which will be much better than what I grow.

Chocolate bon-bons are not needed for life either, giving us the perogative of how many we eat if any at all.

Who is "they"? Remnant, you mentioned a they when you typed out your post promoting total legalization. I have never seen nor have I heard of any "they". Certainly "they" would allow for a distinction between industrial hemp and marijuana if it meant that "they" would keep most of their power. Besides, the political problems that started the hemp ban were so long ago that nobody really knows about the deal and would really care about a non-drug. There are distinctions made in other countries than the US. Besides, I am certain that the biomass from marijuana would have to be processed for you to use it to heat your house anyway, putting a big chunk of biomass could never get a car to run.

The example of chocolate bon-bons is taking my argument to an extreme. Chocolate bon bons have no controversy. Also the negative effects of bon bons are unquestionably small in the greater scheme of things. Machinery can be operated under the influence of bon bons, pregnant women can eat bon bons with impunity, bon bons do not really affect the minds of those who consume them other than providing sugar which is beneficial and provided by a thousand other things, the only negative effect of bon bons is possibly due to the high caloric content however considering that fast food is a greater danger for the waistlines of most people in developed nations means that bon bons are somewhere near the bottom of the list of things to legislate against. However, I do enjoy fast food but if it would help our obesity figures I would support a ban because I do realize that fast food is unhealthy.

Right psych, I cannot determine what your life is like. You may feel better with your soma as you drug yourself with it. Soma does feel good, soma does bring pleasure. However, this does not mean that soma is a good thing. *Soma is the word I decided to use for marijuana in a few instances. It is a reference to a drug that was used in a book to make people content and wretched. The people in the book genuinely desired the drug even though I don't think it was physically addicting and would use it for pleasure. It was a dystopia novel.

Well, there is a distinct difference between medical and non-medical use. Medical use is when a drug is prescribed by a doctor of medicine or bought over the counter. Prescription drugs are used to end a problem or to pre-empt a problem and are only to be used if a doctor orders it. Over the counter drugs are weak drugs that are used by people to solve a problem that affects their daily living, not a psychological problem but a physical problem like an ache or allergies or something of that nature. These drugs are over the counter because they are considered relatively harmless, widely usable, and typically solve problems caused by daily living that are not considered worth going to a doctor for.

Marijuana is also a drug that can cause more problems with weight though too. It is being considered as a drug for AIDs sufferers but the only concern is that it will make the person fat unless they are forced to do exercise. Most 1st world countries have a problem with weight and marijuana use can make this worse. Stress is often a sign of problems anyway and to "stone" your way out of them could be a means of avoiding solving these problems. Besides we become stronger people by facing our problems and overcoming rather than by avoiding through the various means offered to us. Soma is a bad thing.

The use of marijuana to deal with cancer is medicinal marijuana. I don't consider the use of marijuana to try to prevent cancer to really be worth it from a medicinal point of view due to the psychological effects. Besides, marijuana does have the negative effect of causing a greater likelyhood of heart attack which probably compensates for the cancer problems considering that heart attack is becoming an increasing problem.

I do listen and I do respond. Perhaps I did not look at the entire thread in some instances because I did not want to read all this talk about "oh how I love my dope" but still. I do also come to different conclusions than you would even given some of the same information.

The point of chocolate bon-bons is that both chocolate and cannabis are psychotropics of similar nature, triggering a sense of well being through receptors which are built in to the human brain. Both are beneficial if used in moderation, yet either could be detrimintal if used to excess, but niether causes any direct significant damage.