Board index › Topical Discussion › Politics, Philosophy, and Religion

Fox News -Still Jerks- want wikipedia to be censored.

Page 5 of 10 [ 154 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 ... 10  Next

Previous topic | Next topic

Oodain
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Jan 2011
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,022
Location: in my own little tamarillo jungle,

15 Sep 2012, 8:49 am

Vexcalibur wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
Looks more like the people going after Fox News on this forum didn't do any research and just started shooting their mouths off, AGAIN.

Isn't it amazing that only people who only get news from Fox News are so much more informed than the rest? It is like the rest of people lived in a COMPLETELY DIFFERENT reality!


across several continets and hundreds if not thousands of different news services :lol:


_________________
//through chaos comes complexity//

the scent of the tamarillo is pungent and powerfull,
woe be to the nose who nears it.


ArrantPariah
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Mar 2012
Age: 122
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,972

15 Sep 2012, 8:54 am

Conservatives have the Conservapedia.

http://conservapedia.com/Main_Page

There wouldn't be any reason for Rupert's minions to refer to the Wikipedia. Plus, Wikipedia articles are too deep for Fox viewers to understand, anyway. They really wouldn't get anything out of it.

Fox Noise is way out of line to be complaining about Wikipedia.



Vexcalibur
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Jan 2008
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,398

15 Sep 2012, 8:57 am

On recent conservapedia-related news. They completely support that Todd Akin's legitimate rape comments were totally correct: http://www.conservapedia.com/Todd_Akin# ... _pregnancy


_________________
.


ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 89
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

15 Sep 2012, 9:03 am

Vexcalibur wrote:
On recent conservapedia-related news. They completely support that Todd Akin's legitimate rape comments were totally correct: http://www.conservapedia.com/Todd_Akin# ... _pregnancy


I wonder if the publishers there still believe the earth is flat.

ruveyn



ArrantPariah
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Mar 2012
Age: 122
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,972

15 Sep 2012, 10:07 am

Vexcalibur wrote:
On recent conservapedia-related news. They completely support that Todd Akin's legitimate rape comments were totally correct: http://www.conservapedia.com/Todd_Akin# ... _pregnancy


It reads exactly like standard Fox Noise/Republican talking points.



Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,751
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

15 Sep 2012, 2:05 pm

Vexcalibur wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
Looks more like the people going after Fox News on this forum didn't do any research and just started shooting their mouths off, AGAIN.

Isn't it amazing that only people who only get news from Fox News are so much more informed than the rest? It is like the rest of people lived in a COMPLETELY DIFFERENT reality!


It's called the Bizzaro world, if you recall your Superman comics.

-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer



Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,751
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

15 Sep 2012, 2:06 pm

Vexcalibur wrote:
On recent conservapedia-related news. They completely support that Todd Akin's legitimate rape comments were totally correct: http://www.conservapedia.com/Todd_Akin# ... _pregnancy


I can't decide if that's just pathetic, or evil.

-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 89
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

15 Sep 2012, 5:41 pm

Kraichgauer wrote:
Vexcalibur wrote:
On recent conservapedia-related news. They completely support that Todd Akin's legitimate rape comments were totally correct: http://www.conservapedia.com/Todd_Akin# ... _pregnancy


I can't decide if that's just pathetic, or evil.

-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


Pathetic and stupid. It is just to unintelligent to be evil.

ruveyn



Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,751
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

15 Sep 2012, 5:45 pm

ruveyn wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Vexcalibur wrote:
On recent conservapedia-related news. They completely support that Todd Akin's legitimate rape comments were totally correct: http://www.conservapedia.com/Todd_Akin# ... _pregnancy


I can't decide if that's just pathetic, or evil.

-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


Pathetic and stupid. It is just to unintelligent to be evil.

ruveyn


I'm sure you're right.

-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer



Inuyasha
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Jan 2009
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,745

15 Sep 2012, 10:36 pm

Cornflake wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
I know that stuff got pulled off wikipedia, since then Fox News has been continually pushing for Wikipedia to have stricter standards.
Actually, you know nothing of the sort because it was never "pulled".
Quote:
EContent magazine subsequently reported the Wikipedia community's internal debate as concluding that: "Prior discussion has determined by broad consensus that the Virgin Killer cover will not be removed" and asserted that Wikipedia contributors "favour inclusion in all but the most extreme cases".
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virgin_Kil ... ontroversy


That wasn't the only thing involved in the ban, that was simply the item that the source I used thought wouldn't be considered actual kiddie porn.

You're also using wikipedia as a source about a controversy in which wikipedia is involved in, that's like using Eric Holder as your star investigator when Eric Holder is the accused.



Master_Pedant
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Mar 2009
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,903

16 Sep 2012, 12:43 am

Vexcalibur wrote:
On recent conservapedia-related news. They completely support that Todd Akin's legitimate rape comments were totally correct: http://www.conservapedia.com/Todd_Akin# ... _pregnancy


Conservapedia ... fountain of wisdom

http://www.conservapedia.com/New_Atheis ... ess_weight

... or not.


_________________
http://www.voterocky.org/


Inuyasha
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Jan 2009
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,745

16 Sep 2012, 12:46 am

Master_Pedant wrote:
Vexcalibur wrote:
On recent conservapedia-related news. They completely support that Todd Akin's legitimate rape comments were totally correct: http://www.conservapedia.com/Todd_Akin# ... _pregnancy


Conservapedia ... fountain of wisdom

http://www.conservapedia.com/New_Atheis ... ess_weight

... or not.


I don't know of any conservatives that take conservapedia seriously, I know of conservatives that consider conservapedia to be a parody or something like comedy central, but I don't know of anyone that actually takes that site seriously...



Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,751
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

16 Sep 2012, 1:10 am

Inuyasha wrote:
Master_Pedant wrote:
Vexcalibur wrote:
On recent conservapedia-related news. They completely support that Todd Akin's legitimate rape comments were totally correct: http://www.conservapedia.com/Todd_Akin# ... _pregnancy


Conservapedia ... fountain of wisdom

http://www.conservapedia.com/New_Atheis ... ess_weight

... or not.


I don't know of any conservatives that take conservapedia seriously, I know of conservatives that consider conservapedia to be a parody or something like comedy central, but I don't know of anyone that actually takes that site seriously...


It was actually stated by Phylis Schaffley (spelling) and her son, with the full intent of it being serious.
But still, I'm glad conservatives don't take that crap seriously.

-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer



ArrantPariah
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Mar 2012
Age: 122
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,972

16 Sep 2012, 8:07 am

There are still some conservatives who take Fox News seriously. It is about the same as the Conservapedia.



Oodain
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Jan 2011
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,022
Location: in my own little tamarillo jungle,

16 Sep 2012, 8:16 am

ArrantPariah wrote:
There are still some conservatives who take Fox News seriously. It is about the same as the Conservapedia.


QFT

sometimes worse, because they can put in infelciton adn body language in a live news broadcast.


_________________
//through chaos comes complexity//

the scent of the tamarillo is pungent and powerfull,
woe be to the nose who nears it.


Hopper
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Aug 2012
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,920
Location: The outskirts

16 Sep 2012, 8:45 am

Inuyasha wrote:
You're also using wikipedia as a source about a controversy in which wikipedia is involved in, that's like using Eric Holder as your star investigator when Eric Holder is the accused.


I've no idea who Eric Holder is, but unless 'Eric Holder' is the collective name for a large, disparate group of individuals, then no, it's not.