Page 5 of 10 [ 149 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 ... 10  Next


What do you think of convict labour?
Yay! 17%  17%  [ 5 ]
Boo! 59%  59%  [ 17 ]
Just display the results 24%  24%  [ 7 ]
Total votes : 29

Hopper
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Aug 2012
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,920
Location: The outskirts

12 Oct 2012, 8:20 am

xenon13 wrote:
All right, say I'm a boss and I'm in the market for workers and I want to keep costs down in order that my profits are higher. What's optimal for me; to have low unemployment and having a seller's market, so I have to be far less choosy, have to pay more, have to train, have to send a bus perhaps for workers, or other ways to lure them to my business, or would I prefer a high unemployment situation where it's a buyer's market where I can choose to pay people far less, force them commute 3 hours on their own to my workplace, have enough choice of candidates so I can choose people who believe in my politics, can account for every moment of their last ten years to my satisfaction, passed a battery of tests that I provide, and I don't have to pay a penny for training? Tell me, if I was a boss, what would I prefer; a low unemployment situation or a high unemployment situation? This is a very simple question with a very clear answer and the answer proves that yes, there are powerful people out there who want unemployment and work hard to make sure there is unemployment. And the NAIRU theory is part of the justification for creating a Reserve Army of Labour. There is nothing at all incoherent about this very simple and obvious fact! The sooner people realise this and stop being in denial about this truth the easier it would be for people to find a real solution to the problems we face today with unemployment.


Yes. There are communities who once had good economies that, since Thatcher, have found themselves struggling if not dead. It was economic policy that caused this, not a sudden surge in laziness.

The problem with economics as it is commonly practised nowadays is it lacks the element of politics it needs - it's true form would be political-economy. Or rather, it pretends it lacks politics, so as to appear scientific. The politics is assumed and implied, but never vocalised. 'But we're just doing the maths', they and their peers might say, as were the engineers who designed cluster bombs. So economics becomes a managerial situation, with the system people are vying for our votes to manage not called into question.

One can see the outcome in the present ideological climate in the UK (and elsewhere, I'd wager) - 20 people chasing a job, and it is apparently the fault of each and every one of those individuals that they didn't get the job. Or the implication that the unemployed are workshy, that a wave of laziness and 'f**k this, I'm going fishing instead' swept through the economy four years back. There is no wider context, or any failure in the system, and you'd be a fool and a communist to say so.

No. This system is a travesty. No intergalactic force is going to come and attack us for trying something else - only those who have something to lose. As the point of this thread shows, it is a race to the bottom for most of us, and there is no reason anyone should join that race.



Last edited by Hopper on 12 Oct 2012, 8:24 am, edited 1 time in total.

GGPViper
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Sep 2009
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,880

12 Oct 2012, 8:24 am

xenon13 wrote:
All right, say I'm a boss and I'm in the market for workers and I want to keep costs down in order that my profits are higher. What's optimal for me?

To have low unemployment and having a seller's market, so I have to be far less choosy, have to pay more, have to train, have to send a bus perhaps for workers, or other ways to lure them to my business?

Or would I prefer a high unemployment situation where it's a buyer's market where I can choose to pay people far less, force them commute 3 hours on their own to my workplace, have enough choice of candidates so I can choose people who believe in my politics, can account for every moment of their last ten years to my satisfaction, passed a battery of tests that I provide, and I don't have to pay a penny for training?

Tell me, if I was a boss, what would I prefer; a low unemployment situation or a high unemployment situation? This is a very simple question with a very clear answer and the answer proves that yes, there are powerful people out there who want unemployment and work hard to make sure there is unemployment.

And the NAIRU theory is part of the justification for creating a Reserve Army of Labour. There is nothing at all incoherent about this very simple and obvious fact! The sooner people realise this and stop being in denial about this truth the easier it would be for people to find a real solution to the problems we face today with unemployment.


See how your post suddenly becomes much more readable when you add *sections* to it. Embrace the wonders of the Internet.

Look what I found. A research paper covering 50 years of US data showing the correlation between the NAIRU and minimum wages

http://www.federalreserve.gov/pubs/feds ... 038pap.pdf

Conclusion ( see page 28 ): Minimum wages go up, NAIRU goes up. This study mostly applies to the US, though, but that was also the focus of the OP.

So, you may in fact be *correct* that there are powerful people out there who want unemployment and work hard to make sure there is unemployment. They - those who advocate raising the minimum wage - are more or less encompassed by the umbrella category known as "The Political Left". I didn't know you were a Ron Paul supporter :twisted:.



ArrantPariah
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Mar 2012
Age: 122
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,972

ArrantPariah
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Mar 2012
Age: 122
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,972

14 Oct 2012, 2:44 pm

Russia still uses prison labour, too.

http://news.yahoo.com/pussy-riot-member ... 22387.html



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 89
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

14 Oct 2012, 3:52 pm

Putting prisoners to work to help defray the cost of their imprisonment is perfectly reasonable. As long as the labor does not constitute undue (and unconstitutional ) physical abuse or cruelty.

ruveyn



ArrantPariah
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Mar 2012
Age: 122
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,972

14 Oct 2012, 6:24 pm

ruveyn wrote:
Putting prisoners to work to help defray the cost of their imprisonment is perfectly reasonable. As long as the labor does not constitute undue (and unconstitutional ) physical abuse or cruelty.

ruveyn


That constitution is very much open to interpretation, ultimately by nine old farts. I'll bet that at least four of them (including Clarence Thomas) would have voted in favour of the Dred Scott decision.



ArrantPariah
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Mar 2012
Age: 122
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,972

17 Nov 2012, 8:52 am

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/17/busin ... h_20121117

Interesting: Ikea used East German prison labour during th 1980s

Quote:
A report by auditors at Ernst & Young concluded that Ikea, a Swedish company, knowingly benefited from forced labor in the former East Germany to manufacture some of its products in the 1980s. Ikea had commissioned the report in May as a result of accusations that both political and criminal prisoners were involved in making components of Ikea furniture and that some Ikea employees knew about it....

The use of political prisoners as forced labor, even decades ago, is a publicity disaster for a company that with its familiar blue and yellow logo seems at times like a cultural ambassador for Sweden. Inexpensive Ikea furnishings have filled countless student apartments and the homes of millions of young families around the world.

Accusations against Ikea started to appear about a year ago in news media reports in Germany and Sweden. Ikea’s admission has given new impetus to efforts by victims’ groups to receive compensation for work they were forced to perform under the Communist government in East Germany, an issue that has long been overshadowed here by the large and deadly slave-labor program under the Nazis....

Ikea is not the only company that has been linked to forced labor in the former East Germany by purchasing goods from suppliers there, though the actual number may never be known.

Mr. Diederich said that after an attempt to escape from East Germany, he was forced to make steel pipes for the firms Klöckner & Company and Mannesmann.

At least two well-known mail-order companies in the former West Germany, Neckermann and Quelle, which have since run into financial trouble, have also been accused of using forced labor.

Christian Sachse, a Berlin historian, said forced labor permeated institutions across East Germany, and that it would take “years of research to properly understand the field.” ....

Jochen Staadt, a professor at the Free University of Berlin, said it was well known at the time that East Germany was using prisoners to work in factories but that West Germany encouraged the production of goods in the East because it allowed the East to reduce its debt. At the same time, companies liked to move production to East Germany because costs were lower.

Professor Staadt said companies like Ikea would still have paid for the work in East Germany but that the pay never reached the workers. “It was pocketed by the G.D.R.,” he said....


We have a similar situation growing in the USA: millions of people incarcerated for years at a time, often for petty drug offenses. Except, in our case, we have the ugly racist aspect to it.



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 89
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

17 Nov 2012, 11:52 am

If we decriminalized drugs, maybe we would not have so many bodies in the slammer to corvee for involuntary servitude.

ruveyn



ArrantPariah
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Mar 2012
Age: 122
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,972

30 Dec 2012, 11:39 am

It looks like China still has the re-education camps

http://shine.yahoo.com/work-money/lette ... 00773.html

Quote:
"People who work here have to work 15 hours a day without Saturday, Sunday break and any holidays. Otherwise, they will suffer torturement, beat and rude remark. Nearly no payment (10 yuan/1 month)." That translates to about $1.61 a month.


Perhaps our convicts should be grateful.



Misslizard
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Jun 2012
Age: 61
Gender: Female
Posts: 20,550
Location: Aux Arcs

30 Dec 2012, 11:47 am

I wonder what the rude remarks are?
"if you don't work hard you will wind up in a museum as a display in the "Bodies" exhibit."



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 89
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

30 Dec 2012, 11:54 am

ArrantPariah wrote:

That constitution is very much open to interpretation, ultimately by nine old farts. I'll bet that at least four of them (including Clarence Thomas) would have voted in favour of the Dred Scott decision.


The Constitution has been open to interpretation since John Marshall usurped the power to declare laws of Congress unconstitutional in Marbury v. Madison.

ruveyn



Raptor
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Mar 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,997
Location: Southeast U.S.A.

30 Dec 2012, 1:29 pm

Lessons can be learned from the convict leasing program (1865-1928). In a nutshell it's a very very bad practice, especially for the convicts, when it becomes a legally accepted practice to arrest and convict people for the sole purpose of feeding business labor needs. That's just wrong.

However, I have no problem with them doing work within the prison solely for the prison like gardening and raising stock to feed the prison populace or other work that directly benefits the operation of the prison.

convict leasing


_________________
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
- Thomas Jefferson


ArrantPariah
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Mar 2012
Age: 122
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,972

30 Dec 2012, 1:32 pm

Raptor's liberalism is showing today. :P



Raptor
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Mar 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,997
Location: Southeast U.S.A.

30 Dec 2012, 1:42 pm

ArrantPariah wrote:
Raptor's liberalism is showing today. :P


No, a liberal wouldn't even want them doing any work inside the prison. Better to spend the taxpayer dollar on food instead of growing it and having a true feeling of self worth and accomplishment...


_________________
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
- Thomas Jefferson


ArrantPariah
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Mar 2012
Age: 122
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,972

30 Dec 2012, 1:54 pm

A Liberal would hire janitors from outside to come in and clean the toilets?



Tequila
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 25 Feb 2006
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 28,897
Location: Lancashire, UK

30 Dec 2012, 2:02 pm

Raptor wrote:
Lessons can be learned from the convict leasing program (1865-1928). In a nutshell it's a very very bad practice, especially for the convicts, when it becomes a legally accepted practice to arrest and convict people for the sole purpose of feeding business labor needs. That's just wrong.

However, I have no problem with them doing work within the prison solely for the prison like gardening and raising stock to feed the prison populace or other work that directly benefits the operation of the prison.

convict leasing


I agree with everything you say there. I don't see a problem with labour being used for the upkeep of a publicly-run prison (in return for some nice extra privileges), but the idea that private business should benefit from forced prison labour is abhorrent to me.

Private businesses should pay the going rate to employers. Anything else is essentially slavery.