Poll about Legalized Prostitution

Post Reply New Topic

Given Mr. Spitzer's social status, and net value in cash, fairly high. We all know that there seems to be some strange allure older, high status, financially well off men have on young females.

Well, you may have a point.

She sure wouldn't be cumming to my hotel room if I couldn't afford it.

It's interesting that all this talk is centered around female sex workers(or it seems to be),but there are male ones also,what about the gigalos,let's not leave the boys out of this.

Okay. Discuss away.

Ha ha,I am not experienced in this feild never having used the services of a male companion.But what's good for the goose is good for the gander so I wondered what people's thoughts were about the males who engage in this profession.I was going to make a joke about certain religious figures and their desire for male love but I think it might p.o. some people.Anyway they have a preference for underage boys not men.

You probably wouldn't want to hire a gigolo with erectile dysfunction. Although, with modern medicine, I suppose that it might be possible for more men to achieve a stick-up, as opposed to a hold-up.

Apparently, when the ladies go abroad on sex tours, it is called "romance travelling."

http://www.canada.com/ottawacitizen/new ... 5a5aa47882

Last edited by ArrantPariah on 19 Oct 2012, 7:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.

It's not as innocent as role play.

I´m a female and I´m not sure.

Rent-a-Rasta,well they say the blacker the berry the sweeter the juice But if they can't ,well,umm,perform their manly duty,do you get your money back?I wonder what happens to those poor dudes later because every one knows "once you go white you ain't ever right."

An innocent pleasure, versus a guilty pleasure.

Asa Akira used to be a professional dominatrix, which included role-play duties.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vC2nuYczXfQ[/youtube]

One more Miss Akira tidbit

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CnPxxllVo_s[/youtube]

just before the 1 minute mark, her response to having to get a regular job is "Ugh! Gross!"

Miss Akira is obviously highly intelligent and very articulate, and could support herself in a conventional profession, if she wanted to go that route. But, she is very good at what she does, and also likes the money.

What grand purpose would be served, if she were to apply herself to a conventional profession, and to restrict her coitus to the occasional man with whom she has a mutual attraction? As of now, through the magic of the internet, she is able to bring happiness to hundreds of millions of post-pubescent males around the world.

Also, regarding female romance tourists:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Female_sex_tourism

Without the wealth difference, many romance tourists would probably have no better luck in, for example, Costa Rica than in their home countries.

Well, I just had to go and look up Ashley Dupre, to see what she has been up to.

Here is an interview with Howard Stern

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bVEQWV2vRgE[/youtube]

Mr. Stern has to be the best interviewer ever.

Anyway, she was getting paid more than $4,000 per poke. Definitely out of my league.

She would also, quite regularly, have coitus with men and women with whom she shared mutual attractions. In the interview, she describes her work as a high-end ejaculatory administrator. Quite fascinating.

I don't know why she would have turned down $2 million to pose for Hustler. She did, however, eventually pose for Playboy.



She also became an "Advice Columnist" for Rupert Murdoch's tabloid The New York Post, where she was called "Spitzer's Babe."

http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/spit ... 8suGawuaiM

Now she is quite pregnant, and engaged to a millionaire, who was a former client of hers, and who was married at the time (most of her paying clients were probably married).

http://blogs.villagevoice.com/runninsca ... he_guy.php

So, this is one way to meet rich men. I wonder how many clients eventually end up divorcing their wives to marry their ejaculatory administrators?

Regarding Mr. Spitzer, the most damnable aspect of his behaviour is his blatant hypocrisy

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/10/nyreg ... ted=1&_r=0

He basically built his political career around going after people who engaged in prostitution.

http://reason.com/archives/2008/03/11/s ... worse-than

He is just as bad as the Republicans who build their careers around bashing homosexuals, and then turn out to be homosexuals themselves.

If two people meet and agree to have coitus, then they may do so with no fear of the Long Appendage of the Law. If I want to pay someone cut my lawn, clean my house, cut my hair or give me a massage, then I may do so. But, I can't pay someone to give me an orgasm. It is simply absurd.

Would the anti prostitution people here still be against it even if it means an increase in the numbers of rape?

In most states, you can't legally cut hair or trim nails without first having completed several months of training, at a cost of over $10,000, and having passed a multiple-choice test.

Without regulation, most ejaculatory administrators simply go out on the street and start working. Potential customers don't know if they are going to receive quality orgasms or not.

Ejaculatory administrators could be trained in examining genitals for potential health problems, and refer clients to medical doctors. It is important to learn various techniques for arousing the penis, and bringing the penis to ejaculation, in such a way that the client is fully satisfied.

Part of the training could focus on the business aspects of the profession: how to attract customers, how to retain repeat clients, how to negotiate fees for services, etc.

The public can go to cosmetology schools for cheap haircuts, performed by students supervised by an instructor. As a means of helping students perfect the art of administering ejaculations, members of the public could probably also walk into schools of ejaculatory arts. The more practice they get before becumming licensed, the better.

I am solidly in favour of legalizing sex workers for a number of reasons:

First, it provides government with an opportunity to tax and regulate this economic activity.

Second, it destigmatizes it, meaning that sex workers who are subject to exploitive or criminal behaviour are more likely to report abuses, and seek legal enforcement of their rights.

Third, it further enables sex workers to work together to enhance their own security and improve their working conditions.

Making prostitution illegal has done precisely nothing to eliminate prostitution or to make prostitutes safer. It's prohibition places the majority of the legal risk on the sex workers rather than the clients, which only serves to increase the risk of exploitation.