MarketAndChurch wrote:
I don't mind that the media is liberal. I mind that the media is liberal, and cannot admit it to itself first and foremost, and of course, to those who consume it. They know what they are doing when they bring conservatives on only to also bring on a liberal to rebut every comment, lest a normal thinking person would ever think of them as being biased. It is funny that to cite the NYTimes is not biased, but to cite the WSJ editorials is.
I don't believe that most of the "media" is "liberal." Most of the "media" seeks to be objective, and to report the news in somewhat balanced ways. Fox "News" just accuses the "media" of being "liberal" because the "media" is not constantly bashing President Obama and seeking desperately to promote Repugnican causes.
MarketAndChurch wrote:
The fact that Fox rules all news sources with half the market proves that the market is biased,
Q.N.E.D.
MarketAndChurch wrote:
funneling all right-wing nut-jobs to only one outlet.
Corrected.
MarketAndChurch wrote:
The same is true of the WSJ as the number one paper of the nation (last I checked), you cannot get conservative thought anywhere to the extent you do with the WSJ. .
The
Wall Street Journal used to have credibility. Now, it is just another Rupert Murdoch tabloid.