GiveMeTheDetails wrote:
But c'mon guys. There's really no denying, from an unbiased examination of Christmas and where/how it came about (dates, tree, yule logs, etc...), that it is a wholly, completely, a pagan influenced holiday that has nothing Biblical. About the only thing 'Christian' about Christmas is that it happens to have the word Christ in it. If one looks at the Bible, it's clear about followers of God (Jew or Christian) not, under any circumstances, becoming involved in pagan holidays, celebrations, observances, etc... and again there really is not mistaking this clear guideline since there was a severe penalty for his people doing so, even death in some cases.
Well, I think if someone claims to be a Christian, they'll look at the example in the Bible and reason on that, and not their own ideas and interpretations. I'm not pointing fingers, nor judging or any of that nonsense. All I'm saying is for other professed Christians to ask themselves, honestly, that if pagan observances were wrong for God's followers then, why/how are they suddenly ok now?
Exactly. That's why I post 1 Corinthians 10:21 a lot because it clearly shows a division between what Paul called "the cup of Jehovah" and "the cup of demons", “the table of Jehovah” and "the table of demons." It almost reminds me of Jesus words at Matthew 6:24 where he states, "No one can slave for two masters; for either he will hate the one and love the other, or he will stick to the one and despise the other." In the context of Christmas for someone to claim to be Christian, to know the history of the celebration, and to knowingly continue to celebrate seems very hypocritical. Jesus said, "God is a Spirit, and those worshiping him must worship with spirit and truth." (John 4:24) Can someone honestly say Christmas is truthful?