Page 5 of 7 [ 107 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next

thomas81
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 May 2012
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,147
Location: County Down, Northern Ireland

04 Jan 2014, 9:15 pm

LoveNotHate wrote:

Agent Smith tells the captured Morpheus that initially the Matrix was a perfect world where everyone would be happy and no suffering. However, humans rejected it, because Smith concludes that "humans define their reality based on misery and suffering".


So you are going to base your worldview on a mediocre Hollywood movie?

The matrix was pseudo-intellectual masturbation at best for teenage cyberpunk goths.


_________________
Being 'normal' is over rated.

My deviant art profile


LoveNotHate
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Oct 2013
Gender: Female
Posts: 6,195
Location: USA

04 Jan 2014, 10:06 pm

thomas81 wrote:
LoveNotHate wrote:

Agent Smith tells the captured Morpheus that initially the Matrix was a perfect world where everyone would be happy and no suffering. However, humans rejected it, because Smith concludes that "humans define their reality based on misery and suffering".


So you are going to base your worldview on a mediocre Hollywood movie?

The matrix was pseudo-intellectual masturbation at best for teenage cyberpunk goths.


I simply pointed out a correlation.

Despite disparaging the movie, you did not address Agent Smith's conclusion that humans derive happiness from their suffering and misery (presumably, that they overcome or have to deal with). Possibly, this book will detail this at a high level, of humans feeling happier when they struggle to earn their money , rather than just being given the money.

This is also reflected in a tv show of the "Twilight Zone: A Nice Place To Visit" in which a gambler/womanizer/crook is sent to hell, and always wins at gambling, always is successful at criminal acts, and can get any woman he wants. He later realizes that happiness comes from suffering (losing and failing), and HELL is living without suffering.

His revelations come at time [21:40-end].

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=btLFfHzWwQY[/youtube]



zer0netgain
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Mar 2009
Age: 58
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,615

04 Jan 2014, 10:49 pm

LoveNotHate wrote:
I simply pointed out a correlation.


A correlation that proves itself true time and time again.

Give a man a million dollars, most of the time he will self-destruct. If he's lucky, he ends up just being poor again.

If that same man does something to EARN a million dollars, he is more likely to do something productive with it.

There is something that comes from making a good thing happen by your own two hands rather than just have it handed to you.

Parents giving their kids new cars...for example. The number of "responsible" kids who wouldn't squander such a gift is quite few. Making your kid work to get a USED car that's theirs, and if they trash it, that's their call, but so many kids who WORK to get their car treat it like a prized treasure because they are more INVESTED in that car.



Raptor
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Mar 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,997
Location: Southeast U.S.A.

04 Jan 2014, 11:45 pm

/\
Hallelujah! :hail: :hail:

But now they'll say "But, but, but what about the people that don't have two hands", missing the point completely as usual.


_________________
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
- Thomas Jefferson


beneficii
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 May 2005
Age: 42
Gender: Female
Posts: 7,245

05 Jan 2014, 2:18 am

Raptor wrote:
/\
Hallelujah! :hail: :hail:

But now they'll say "But, but, but what about the people that don't have two hands", missing the point completely as usual.


I always thought this conversation, from the start, was about wages, you know, for work.


_________________
"You have a responsibility to consider all sides of a problem and a responsibility to make a judgment and a responsibility to care for all involved." --Ian Danskin


91
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Oct 2010
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,063
Location: Australia

05 Jan 2014, 2:35 am

beneficii wrote:
Raptor wrote:
/\
Hallelujah! :hail: :hail:

But now they'll say "But, but, but what about the people that don't have two hands", missing the point completely as usual.


I always thought this conversation, from the start, was about wages, you know, for work.


Nope, it was hijacked by people who want to discuss flat-earth econmics and stereotypes about the work ethic of poor people..


_________________
Life is real ! Life is earnest!
And the grave is not its goal ;
Dust thou art, to dust returnest,
Was not spoken of the soul.


LoveNotHate
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Oct 2013
Gender: Female
Posts: 6,195
Location: USA

05 Jan 2014, 7:31 am

I think the premise that "wages are too low" may need some qualification.

Wages are too low for service workers ?
Wages are too low for the average American?
Wages are too low Americans with no college?



hanyo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Sep 2011
Age: 51
Gender: Female
Posts: 4,302

05 Jan 2014, 3:46 pm

For me personally the more I work for something the less I tend to value it. When I finally get it I think it wasn't worth the trouble and I could have done without it or with something cheaper/easier.



Raptor
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Mar 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,997
Location: Southeast U.S.A.

05 Jan 2014, 5:06 pm

91 wrote:
beneficii wrote:
Raptor wrote:
/\
Hallelujah! :hail: :hail:

But now they'll say "But, but, but what about the people that don't have two hands", missing the point completely as usual.


I always thought this conversation, from the start, was about wages, you know, for work.


Nope, it was hijacked by people who want to discuss flat-earth econmics and stereotypes about the work ethic of poor people..


No, I think my comment was quite relevant to the topic. It's not to your liking so therefor it must be a derailment or trolling.


_________________
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
- Thomas Jefferson


beneficii
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 May 2005
Age: 42
Gender: Female
Posts: 7,245

05 Jan 2014, 6:03 pm

Raptor wrote:
91 wrote:
beneficii wrote:
Raptor wrote:
/\
Hallelujah! :hail: :hail:

But now they'll say "But, but, but what about the people that don't have two hands", missing the point completely as usual.


I always thought this conversation, from the start, was about wages, you know, for work.


Nope, it was hijacked by people who want to discuss flat-earth econmics and stereotypes about the work ethic of poor people..


No, I think my comment was quite relevant to the topic. It's not to your liking so therefor it must be a derailment or trolling.


zer0netgain seemed to be talking about people who expected things without any work. The OP was about how wages (for work) have crashed over the last half-century.


_________________
"You have a responsibility to consider all sides of a problem and a responsibility to make a judgment and a responsibility to care for all involved." --Ian Danskin


LoveNotHate
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Oct 2013
Gender: Female
Posts: 6,195
Location: USA

05 Jan 2014, 6:15 pm

LoveNotHate wrote:
I think the premise that "wages are too low" may need some qualification.

Wages are too low for service workers ?
Wages are too low for the average American?
Wages are too low Americans with no college?


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_co ... erage_wage

United States ranked #1

According to the above computation for average wage, Americans are on average the highest average wage earners in the world.



Raptor
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Mar 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,997
Location: Southeast U.S.A.

05 Jan 2014, 6:30 pm

beneficii wrote:
Raptor wrote:
91 wrote:
beneficii wrote:
Raptor wrote:
/\
Hallelujah! :hail: :hail:

But now they'll say "But, but, but what about the people that don't have two hands", missing the point completely as usual.


I always thought this conversation, from the start, was about wages, you know, for work.


Nope, it was hijacked by people who want to discuss flat-earth econmics and stereotypes about the work ethic of poor people..


No, I think my comment was quite relevant to the topic. It's not to your liking so therefor it must be a derailment or trolling.


zer0netgain seemed to be talking about people who expected things without any work. The OP was about how wages (for work) have crashed over the last half-century.


Yeah, well it all ties in. But ask me for my "scientific proof" anyway.


_________________
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
- Thomas Jefferson


LoveNotHate
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Oct 2013
Gender: Female
Posts: 6,195
Location: USA

05 Jan 2014, 8:19 pm

I reiterate, are wages really low or lower ?

Americans are on average the highest average wage earners in the world

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_co ... erage_wage

American household income has increased over the last 34 years !

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Household_ ... ted_States

[img][800:435]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/37/Median_US_household_income.png[/img]

American Real wages up since 1964 (though not by much)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Real_wage

Image



91
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Oct 2010
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,063
Location: Australia

06 Jan 2014, 7:06 am

"Economists agree: Raising the minimum wage reduces poverty"
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/won ... s-poverty/


_________________
Life is real ! Life is earnest!
And the grave is not its goal ;
Dust thou art, to dust returnest,
Was not spoken of the soul.


zer0netgain
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Mar 2009
Age: 58
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,615

06 Jan 2014, 10:58 am

Those charts have two fatal flaws that any person whose taken a basic statistics class can spot.

1. Median "household" income. If you factor all sources of income for a household, it skews the resulting average. That chart is proposed to be representative of a single income earner, but much of the numbers could reflect multiple incomes under one roof...making the average per job much lower.

2. Likewise, the wages chart (along with household income) is an AVERAGE. Many publications like to state (for example) the "average" starting wage of an attorney in a given state. Well, if you toss in the $1,000,000+ earners with the ones barely getting by, you get a respectable average wage. To be honest to the typical law school graduate, you have to omit those making excessively high wages to get a number that's more in line with the REALITY of what they can expect to earn in that state.



hanyo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Sep 2011
Age: 51
Gender: Female
Posts: 4,302

06 Jan 2014, 11:02 am

LoveNotHate wrote:
[img][800:435]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/37/Median_US_household_income.png[/img]


My household income is about half of the lowest point on that chart.