Was Satan wrong to demand equal rights in heaven?
ooOoOoOAnaOoOoOoo wrote:
GnosticBishop wrote:
ooOoOoOAnaOoOoOoo wrote:
GnosticBishop wrote:
Was Satan wrong to demand equal rights in heaven?
Heaven, from what we can speculate, seems to be a system that some would call a tyranny as no one was allowed to question anything or ask for change in leadership or policies.
Was Satan and the third of angels who rejected tyranny wrong to demand equal rights, and if so, are all people who demand equal rights on earth also doing something satanic?
Is this why most religions are reluctant to give women and gays equality? Do Christians and Muslims think equality to be evil and satanic?
Do religious people think that their Gods frown on the notions of equality of all people and is that why believers deny women and gays equality?
Regards
DL
Heaven, from what we can speculate, seems to be a system that some would call a tyranny as no one was allowed to question anything or ask for change in leadership or policies.
Was Satan and the third of angels who rejected tyranny wrong to demand equal rights, and if so, are all people who demand equal rights on earth also doing something satanic?
Is this why most religions are reluctant to give women and gays equality? Do Christians and Muslims think equality to be evil and satanic?
Do religious people think that their Gods frown on the notions of equality of all people and is that why believers deny women and gays equality?
Regards
DL
In God's Kingdom, yes, Satan was wrong. Let him go to his own Kingdom and then he can have equality if that's what he wants.
Believers do not always grant equal rights and generally view people as unequal and they are unequal to God, especially the Calvinists and Primitives who believe in predestination. They might look at others as being very unequal and there's no way to change it.
So one should not fight tyranny if one does not own where they live.
Tyrants around the word will be pleased to have slugs who thin that way living there.
Regards
DL
If you go by what's in the Bible and that is how you see God, through the filter of all those Bible writers, and you have the right to view God through their lens but I wouldn't recommend relying solely on someone else to tell you all about God, then yes, God is a bloody tyrant who deals with the Devil and lets him nearly destroy good folk like Job, and judges people by making others rise up against them and beat them to a pulp. These are only a couple of God's Biblical tactics, there are others. God is pretty much a corrupt despot and if you don't like it, tough.
I seek out literalists to try to heal them of their immoral thinking.
God is as you describe and quite vile yet poor thinking literalist idol worshipers end up adoring that vile and evil God.
I want to help them find a moral God.
That would be the Gnostic Christian God that they rejected when killing us and burning our scriptures..
Regards
DL
Barchan wrote:
Yes, it's shirk. God can have no equal. How can there be two omnipotent, ultimate, and eternal creators?
There could not be such a creator so it must all be a lie.
If God is all powerful, then he has all the power so there cannot be any left for you and I to use to live.
That is the problem with using made up terms like Omni-potent that do not apply to a God.
When we created the Gods we should have thought more of the impossible attributes we were giving our creation.
Regards
DL
diminished57 wrote:
Lucifer was an angel. Angels are above humans, thus... well I don't believe in fairy tales or a "life after death." Oxymorons.
Jesus indicates that angels are below mankind. We can be his brethren and he is above angels so that we that we are also.
Matthew 6:22 The light of the body is the eye: if therefore thine eye be single, thy whole body shall be full of light.
John 14:23 Jesus answered and said unto him, If a man love me, he will keep my words: and my Father will love him, and we will come unto him, and make our abode with him.
Luke 17:21 Neither shall they say, Lo here! or, lo there! for, behold, the kingdom of God is within you.
Romans 8:29 For whom he did foreknow, he also did predestinate to be conformed to the image of his Son, that he might be the firstborn among many brethren.
Regards
DL
AspieOtaku wrote:
So......Satan was a feminist?
Why not.
Vatican art depicts Satan as female so it would be natural for her to be a feminist.
http://www.wga.hu/art/m/michelan/3sisti ... 4_3ce4.jpg
Regards
DL
naturalplastic wrote:
Who implied that he was feminist?
I did and it is she, not he.
She is a part of Christianity blaming reality on women.
http://www.wga.hu/art/m/michelan/3sisti ... 4_3ce4.jpg
Does that look like a man's breasts to you?
Regards
DL
Kraichgauer
Veteran
Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,751
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
GnosticBishop wrote:
naturalplastic wrote:
Who implied that he was feminist?
I did and it is she, not he.
She is a part of Christianity blaming reality on women.
http://www.wga.hu/art/m/michelan/3sisti ... 4_3ce4.jpg
Does that look like a man's breasts to you?
Regards
DL
That's in the Vatican from the Renaissance. How is that an actual reflection of the ancient text, which does not make Satan a woman, which had been conceived of thousands of years before?
_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
Kraichgauer wrote:
GnosticBishop wrote:
naturalplastic wrote:
Who implied that he was feminist?
I did and it is she, not he.
She is a part of Christianity blaming reality on women.
http://www.wga.hu/art/m/michelan/3sisti ... 4_3ce4.jpg
Does that look like a man's breasts to you?
Regards
DL
That's in the Vatican from the Renaissance. How is that an actual reflection of the ancient text, which does not make Satan a woman, which had been conceived of thousands of years before?
Seems, as is usual, that the church does not care what is written but are more interested in vilifying women, as is their misogynistic custom.
Here are a few of the many quotes I could show.
The second century St. Clement of Alexandria wrote: "Every woman should be filled with shame by the thought that she is a woman."
The Church father Tertullian explained why women deserve their status as despised and inferior human beings:
"And do you not know that you are an Eve? The sentence of God on this sex of yours lives in this age: the guilt must of necessity live too. You are the devil's gateway: you are the unsealer of that tree: you are the first deserter of the divine law: you are she who persuaded him whom the devil was not valiant enough to attack. You destroyed so easily God's image, man. On account of your desert that is, death even the Son of God had to die."
The sixth century Christian philosopher, Boethius, wrote in The Consolation of Philosophy, "Woman is a temple built upon a sewer."
In the tenth century Odo of Cluny declared, "To embrace a woman is to embrace a sack of manure..."
St. Thomas Aquinas suggested that God had made a mistake in creating woman: "nothing [deficient] or defective should have been produced in the first establishment of things; so woman ought not to have been produced then."
Regards
DL
Kraichgauer
Veteran
Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,751
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
GnosticBishop wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
GnosticBishop wrote:
naturalplastic wrote:
Who implied that he was feminist?
I did and it is she, not he.
She is a part of Christianity blaming reality on women.
http://www.wga.hu/art/m/michelan/3sisti ... 4_3ce4.jpg
Does that look like a man's breasts to you?
Regards
DL
That's in the Vatican from the Renaissance. How is that an actual reflection of the ancient text, which does not make Satan a woman, which had been conceived of thousands of years before?
Seems, as is usual, that the church does not care what is written but are more interested in vilifying women, as is their misogynistic custom.
Here are a few of the many quotes I could show.
The second century St. Clement of Alexandria wrote: "Every woman should be filled with shame by the thought that she is a woman."
The Church father Tertullian explained why women deserve their status as despised and inferior human beings:
"And do you not know that you are an Eve? The sentence of God on this sex of yours lives in this age: the guilt must of necessity live too. You are the devil's gateway: you are the unsealer of that tree: you are the first deserter of the divine law: you are she who persuaded him whom the devil was not valiant enough to attack. You destroyed so easily God's image, man. On account of your desert that is, death even the Son of God had to die."
The sixth century Christian philosopher, Boethius, wrote in The Consolation of Philosophy, "Woman is a temple built upon a sewer."
In the tenth century Odo of Cluny declared, "To embrace a woman is to embrace a sack of manure..."
St. Thomas Aquinas suggested that God had made a mistake in creating woman: "nothing [deficient] or defective should have been produced in the first establishment of things; so woman ought not to have been produced then."
Regards
DL
And yet Luther, who had needless to say disagreements with Rome, thought that Eve's fall had more to do with her being human than with being a woman.
_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
Kraichgauer wrote:
[
And yet Luther, who had needless to say disagreements with Rome, thought that Eve's fall had more to do with her being human than with being a woman.
And yet Luther, who had needless to say disagreements with Rome, thought that Eve's fall had more to do with her being human than with being a woman.
Logical. Men and women are quite close at the brain mind level.
We do have our own ways though.
I do not like some of his other views of women though.
The word and works of God is quite clear, that women were made either to be wives or prostitutes. – Martin Luther, Reformer (1483-1546), Works 12.94
No gown worse becomes a woman than the desire to be wise. – Martin Luther, Reformer (1483-1546)
Men have broad and large chests, and small narrow hips, and more understanding than women, who have but small and narrow breasts, and broad hips, to the end they should remain at home, sit still, keep house, and bear and bring up children. – Martin Luther, Reformer (1483-1546), Table Talk
“If a woman grows weary and, at last, dies from childbearing, it matters not. Let her die from bearing - she is there to do it.”
- Martin Luther
If M L had not turned to being a Gnostic Christian after all that nonsense, I would not have any respect for him at all.
Regards
DL
Kraichgauer
Veteran
Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,751
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
GnosticBishop wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
[
And yet Luther, who had needless to say disagreements with Rome, thought that Eve's fall had more to do with her being human than with being a woman.
And yet Luther, who had needless to say disagreements with Rome, thought that Eve's fall had more to do with her being human than with being a woman.
Logical. Men and women are quite close at the brain mind level.
We do have our own ways though.
I do not like some of his other views of women though.
The word and works of God is quite clear, that women were made either to be wives or prostitutes. – Martin Luther, Reformer (1483-1546), Works 12.94
No gown worse becomes a woman than the desire to be wise. – Martin Luther, Reformer (1483-1546)
Men have broad and large chests, and small narrow hips, and more understanding than women, who have but small and narrow breasts, and broad hips, to the end they should remain at home, sit still, keep house, and bear and bring up children. – Martin Luther, Reformer (1483-1546), Table Talk
“If a woman grows weary and, at last, dies from childbearing, it matters not. Let her die from bearing - she is there to do it.”
- Martin Luther
If M L had not turned to being a Gnostic Christian after all that nonsense, I would not have any respect for him at all.
Regards
DL
Of course what Luther wrote about women - as what he wrote about Jews - was nonsense. He lived in the 16th century, after all. I challenge anyone to find someone from that period of time who hadn't written or said something nuts back in those days.
_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
Kraichgauer wrote:
GnosticBishop wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
[
And yet Luther, who had needless to say disagreements with Rome, thought that Eve's fall had more to do with her being human than with being a woman.
And yet Luther, who had needless to say disagreements with Rome, thought that Eve's fall had more to do with her being human than with being a woman.
Logical. Men and women are quite close at the brain mind level.
We do have our own ways though.
I do not like some of his other views of women though.
The word and works of God is quite clear, that women were made either to be wives or prostitutes. – Martin Luther, Reformer (1483-1546), Works 12.94
No gown worse becomes a woman than the desire to be wise. – Martin Luther, Reformer (1483-1546)
Men have broad and large chests, and small narrow hips, and more understanding than women, who have but small and narrow breasts, and broad hips, to the end they should remain at home, sit still, keep house, and bear and bring up children. – Martin Luther, Reformer (1483-1546), Table Talk
“If a woman grows weary and, at last, dies from childbearing, it matters not. Let her die from bearing - she is there to do it.”
- Martin Luther
If M L had not turned to being a Gnostic Christian after all that nonsense, I would not have any respect for him at all.
Regards
DL
Of course what Luther wrote about women - as what he wrote about Jews - was nonsense. He lived in the 16th century, after all. I challenge anyone to find someone from that period of time who hadn't written or said something nuts back in those days.
In terms of religion, no argument.
Science was beginning to take off though and much of what we know started in those times. The printing press was the trigger for much.
Regards
DL
Kraichgauer
Veteran
Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,751
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
GnosticBishop wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
GnosticBishop wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
[
And yet Luther, who had needless to say disagreements with Rome, thought that Eve's fall had more to do with her being human than with being a woman.
And yet Luther, who had needless to say disagreements with Rome, thought that Eve's fall had more to do with her being human than with being a woman.
Logical. Men and women are quite close at the brain mind level.
We do have our own ways though.
I do not like some of his other views of women though.
The word and works of God is quite clear, that women were made either to be wives or prostitutes. – Martin Luther, Reformer (1483-1546), Works 12.94
No gown worse becomes a woman than the desire to be wise. – Martin Luther, Reformer (1483-1546)
Men have broad and large chests, and small narrow hips, and more understanding than women, who have but small and narrow breasts, and broad hips, to the end they should remain at home, sit still, keep house, and bear and bring up children. – Martin Luther, Reformer (1483-1546), Table Talk
“If a woman grows weary and, at last, dies from childbearing, it matters not. Let her die from bearing - she is there to do it.”
- Martin Luther
If M L had not turned to being a Gnostic Christian after all that nonsense, I would not have any respect for him at all.
Regards
DL
Of course what Luther wrote about women - as what he wrote about Jews - was nonsense. He lived in the 16th century, after all. I challenge anyone to find someone from that period of time who hadn't written or said something nuts back in those days.
In terms of religion, no argument.
Science was beginning to take off though and much of what we know started in those times. The printing press was the trigger for much.
Regards
DL
Without the printing press, the Protestant Reformation would have been dead in the water, as vernacular language Bibles which had spread Protestantism could never have been mass produced.
_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
Kraichgauer wrote:
GnosticBishop wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
GnosticBishop wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
[
And yet Luther, who had needless to say disagreements with Rome, thought that Eve's fall had more to do with her being human than with being a woman.
And yet Luther, who had needless to say disagreements with Rome, thought that Eve's fall had more to do with her being human than with being a woman.
Logical. Men and women are quite close at the brain mind level.
We do have our own ways though.
I do not like some of his other views of women though.
The word and works of God is quite clear, that women were made either to be wives or prostitutes. – Martin Luther, Reformer (1483-1546), Works 12.94
No gown worse becomes a woman than the desire to be wise. – Martin Luther, Reformer (1483-1546)
Men have broad and large chests, and small narrow hips, and more understanding than women, who have but small and narrow breasts, and broad hips, to the end they should remain at home, sit still, keep house, and bear and bring up children. – Martin Luther, Reformer (1483-1546), Table Talk
“If a woman grows weary and, at last, dies from childbearing, it matters not. Let her die from bearing - she is there to do it.”
- Martin Luther
If M L had not turned to being a Gnostic Christian after all that nonsense, I would not have any respect for him at all.
Regards
DL
Of course what Luther wrote about women - as what he wrote about Jews - was nonsense. He lived in the 16th century, after all. I challenge anyone to find someone from that period of time who hadn't written or said something nuts back in those days.
In terms of religion, no argument.
Science was beginning to take off though and much of what we know started in those times. The printing press was the trigger for much.
Regards
DL
Without the printing press, the Protestant Reformation would have been dead in the water, as vernacular language Bibles which had spread Protestantism could never have been mass produced.
Hard to say. I think that the world might have been fed up with Catholic lies and deception by then.
No press would have slowed progress but I do not think it would have killed it.
Regards
DL
| Similar Topics | |
|---|---|
| Hello Wrong Planet! |
03 Jul 2026, 1:53 pm |
| wrong planet is back! |
07 Aug 2026, 6:54 pm |
| Is it wrong to talk about personal issues at work? |
22 Aug 2026, 2:15 pm |
