Trump says Hispanic Americans have an 'inherent conflict'
I don't get how you can pretend that insisting someone is incapable of doing their job professionally on the basis of their ethnicity isn't the very definition of racism. When even his lawyers won't support him on something, there's probably a reason.
For the record, I disagree with Trump making an issue out of this, I just don't think it's racist. Whether you're born into the group or not, if that group is openly hostile towards you, it can call into question the fairness of how someone in that group would treat you. As in my example, if Hilary is indicted and the assigned judge is NRA member and he does something Hilary thinks is unfair (whether it's actually unfair or not), she could make the exact same argument. The point is that the race doesn't matter, it's a group and the same process could be applied to any group.
And you know this because it worked so well for Detroit and the auto business?
_________________
Your boos mean nothing, I've seen what makes you cheer.
- Rick Sanchez
http://www.breitbart.com/2016-president ... ot-racist/
If you booted the judge into Mexico, he'd be an immigrant, as he's a born American citizen.
If you want to convince the rest of us that we're wrong, I'd suggest you cite something considerably more reliable than Breitbart.
No, I will not cite another source. What I learned is that no matter what source I cite it will never be good enough for the Left. I know in my own mind and heart that Trump is right and I don't really give a damn if anyone else does or not. And yes, the judge should be off the case because it is a conflict of interest. Look up "La Raza" and then get back to me.
_________________
Me grumpy?
I'm happiness challenged.
Your neurodiverse (Aspie) score: 83 of 200
Your neurotypical (non-autistic) score: 153 of 200 You are very likely neurotypical
Darn, I flunked.
funeralxempire
Veteran
Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 41
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 34,230
Location: Right over your left shoulder
I don't get how you can pretend that insisting someone is incapable of doing their job professionally on the basis of their ethnicity isn't the very definition of racism. When even his lawyers won't support him on something, there's probably a reason.
For the record, I disagree with Trump making an issue out of this, I just don't think it's racist. Whether you're born into the group or not, if that group is openly hostile towards you, it can call into question the fairness of how someone in that group would treat you. As in my example, if Hilary is indicted and the assigned judge is NRA member and he does something Hilary thinks is unfair (whether it's actually unfair or not), she could make the exact same argument. The point is that the race doesn't matter, it's a group and the same process could be applied to any group.
Firstly, the assumption that the judge would be anything but professional and impartial on the basis of any group affiliation is nonsense. We expect people in that line of work to demonstrate integrity. If Trump has a reasonable basis to question Curiel's integrity he's welcome to spell out his case - so far he has failed to make a case.
Secondly, if it wasn't racial he shouldn't have made race the issue. Trump chose to make race the issue. I thought legal Hispanics were on Trump's side? Isn't that what he always insists? Well, here's a Mexican-American, born in the US from parents who immigrated legally, who went on to become a judge. Aren't those the success stories that Trump insists are backing him? Hiding your head in the sand or else where won't make his racism any less blatantly obvious. The chump isn't using a dogwhistle - he's using a bullhorn.
_________________
The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the oppressing. —Malcolm X
Just a reminder: under international law, an occupying power has no right of self-defense, and those who are occupied have the right and duty to liberate themselves by any means possible.
funeralxempire
Veteran
Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 41
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 34,230
Location: Right over your left shoulder
http://www.breitbart.com/2016-president ... ot-racist/
If you booted the judge into Mexico, he'd be an immigrant, as he's a born American citizen.
If you want to convince the rest of us that we're wrong, I'd suggest you cite something considerably more reliable than Breitbart.
No, I will not cite another source. What I learned is that no matter what source I cite it will never be good enough for the Left. I know in my own mind and heart that Trump is right and I don't really give a damn if anyone else does or not. And yes, the judge should be off the case because it is a conflict of interest. Look up "La Raza" and then get back to me.
You should look up La Raza Lawyers of San Diego (the correct La Raza) since you keep dishonestly or ignorantly conflating it with the National Council of La Raza. You can't base your opinions on objectively incorrect understandings of the topic and expect your opinions to be given credibility.
_________________
The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the oppressing. —Malcolm X
Just a reminder: under international law, an occupying power has no right of self-defense, and those who are occupied have the right and duty to liberate themselves by any means possible.
http://www.breitbart.com/2016-president ... ot-racist/
If you booted the judge into Mexico, he'd be an immigrant, as he's a born American citizen.
If you want to convince the rest of us that we're wrong, I'd suggest you cite something considerably more reliable than Breitbart.
No, I will not cite another source. What I learned is that no matter what source I cite it will never be good enough for the Left. I know in my own mind and heart that Trump is right and I don't really give a damn if anyone else does or not. And yes, the judge should be off the case because it is a conflict of interest. Look up "La Raza" and then get back to me.
You should look up La Raza Lawyers of San Diego (the correct La Raza) since you keep dishonestly or ignorantly conflating it with the National Council of La Raza. You can't base your opinions on objectively incorrect understandings of the topic and expect your opinions to be given credibility.
What are you talking about? I found this:
http://larazalawyers.net/id3.html
What is that down at the bottom of the page? NATIONAL COUNCIL OF LA RAZA Link.
And DO NOT call me ignorant or dishonest, got that?
_________________
Me grumpy?
I'm happiness challenged.
Your neurodiverse (Aspie) score: 83 of 200
Your neurotypical (non-autistic) score: 153 of 200 You are very likely neurotypical
Darn, I flunked.
androbot01
Veteran
Joined: 17 Sep 2014
Age: 55
Gender: Female
Posts: 6,746
Location: Kingston, Ontario, Canada
And DO NOT call me ignorant or dishonest, got that?
Ah-ha! Guilt by link.
And what do you mean by this post?
_________________
Me grumpy?
I'm happiness challenged.
Your neurodiverse (Aspie) score: 83 of 200
Your neurotypical (non-autistic) score: 153 of 200 You are very likely neurotypical
Darn, I flunked.
androbot01
Veteran
Joined: 17 Sep 2014
Age: 55
Gender: Female
Posts: 6,746
Location: Kingston, Ontario, Canada
And DO NOT call me ignorant or dishonest, got that?
Ah-ha! Guilt by link.
And what do you mean by this post?
I mean that it is a telling detail. If the site is referring to the other site then they are endorsing them. Still though I think the issue is Curiel's ability to put aside any personal prejudices to act professionally. Trump seems unaware that this is possible.
funeralxempire
Veteran
Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 41
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 34,230
Location: Right over your left shoulder
You labelled the judge as 'an illegal' repeatedly despite it being objective fact he's an American citizen - this is either ignorant or dishonest. I call a spade a spade. Dwi.
Indeed, they have a link to the National Council of La Raza at the bottom of the page, in a section with links to several other civil rights and community groups that focus on the Latino community. This is perhaps an endorsement but does not indicate that
La Raza Lawyers of San Diego is directly affiliated with National Council of La Raza any more than they are affiliated with National Latino Peace Officers Association or League of United Latin American Citizens.
_________________
The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the oppressing. —Malcolm X
Just a reminder: under international law, an occupying power has no right of self-defense, and those who are occupied have the right and duty to liberate themselves by any means possible.
Last edited by funeralxempire on 07 Jun 2016, 6:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Donald Trump's racism is not only direct at Mexicans, but Muslims as well. By extension, it's directed at Hispanics and Middle-Easterners too.
I do not want a racist president. Nor do I want a president who is contemptuous of women, hourly workers, and anyone who holds a diverging or opposing opinion.
_________________
The mere fact that science may not yet adequately explain an object, event, or experience does not mean the immediate explanation should automatically default to a conspiratorial, extraterrestrial, paranormal, or supernatural cause.
Kraichgauer
Veteran
Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,751
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
http://www.breitbart.com/2016-president ... ot-racist/
If you booted the judge into Mexico, he'd be an immigrant, as he's a born American citizen.
If you want to convince the rest of us that we're wrong, I'd suggest you cite something considerably more reliable than Breitbart.
No, I will not cite another source. What I learned is that no matter what source I cite it will never be good enough for the Left. I know in my own mind and heart that Trump is right and I don't really give a damn if anyone else does or not. And yes, the judge should be off the case because it is a conflict of interest. Look up "La Raza" and then get back to me.
Actually, we would be very satisfied if you could find a source that is known to be unbiased, or even left leaning.
_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
You labelled the judge as 'an illegal' repeatedly despite it being objective fact he's an American citizen - this is either ignorant or dishonest. I call a spade a spade. Dwi.
Indeed, they have a link to the National Council of La Raza at the bottom of the page, in a section with links to several other civil rights and community groups that focus on the Latino community. This is perhaps an endorsement but does not indicate that
La Raza Lawyers of San Diego is directly affiliated with National Council of La Raza any more than they are affiliated with National Latino Peace Officers Association or League of United Latin American Citizens.
Let me correct what I meant then by saying that I know the judge is not an illegal citizen (I'm not stupid), but I still mean to throw him over the wall with the rest of the illegals since he is definitely on THEIR side and has a conflict of interest in THIS case.
An endorsement means that you agree with that group. THIS is the reason that I don't engage in any debates with people on the Left anymore. It doesn't matter what evidence someone puts in front of you, you are still going to make the other person out to be the idiot. Well, I'm not the idiot. The judge is in with La Raza as far as I am concerned - end of story. NEXT!
Oh, and I almost forgot - GO TRUMP! GO TRUMP! GO TRUMP!
_________________
Me grumpy?
I'm happiness challenged.
Your neurodiverse (Aspie) score: 83 of 200
Your neurotypical (non-autistic) score: 153 of 200 You are very likely neurotypical
Darn, I flunked.
Kraichgauer
Veteran
Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,751
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
And you know this because it worked so well for Detroit and the auto business?
The Detroit auto industry collapsed because of corporate greed, and by the machinations of right wing plutocrats. I fail to see how anyone but the heads of big corporations see any prosperity when everyone else is working for starvation wages, and still have a strong national economy. How about passing laws forbidding corporations from betraying the American people by outsourcing to other countries?
_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
http://www.breitbart.com/2016-president ... ot-racist/
If you booted the judge into Mexico, he'd be an immigrant, as he's a born American citizen.
If you want to convince the rest of us that we're wrong, I'd suggest you cite something considerably more reliable than Breitbart.
No, I will not cite another source. What I learned is that no matter what source I cite it will never be good enough for the Left. I know in my own mind and heart that Trump is right and I don't really give a damn if anyone else does or not. And yes, the judge should be off the case because it is a conflict of interest. Look up "La Raza" and then get back to me.
Actually, we would be very satisfied if you could find a source that is known to be unbiased, or even left leaning.
I mean no disrespect when I say this because I like you as a person, Kraichgauer, but my lot in life is not to make the Left satisfied - at least not anymore. Any news article that is Left-leaning wouldn't be telling the truth from the Right, would it? It's actually very hard to find a Right media as all of the media is Left biased. That is why the Left always gets away with the crap it pulls - because the media doesn't report anything negative on the Democratic side if it can help it.
_________________
Me grumpy?
I'm happiness challenged.
Your neurodiverse (Aspie) score: 83 of 200
Your neurotypical (non-autistic) score: 153 of 200 You are very likely neurotypical
Darn, I flunked.
