Page 5 of 8 [ 128 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next

friedmacguffins
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,539

05 Sep 2016, 3:07 pm

When did you quit stealing cars?



friedmacguffins
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,539

05 Sep 2016, 3:09 pm

Quote:
I think it immoral for anyone to deny a person the right to leave a poor or abusive mate or marriage and also immoral to try to prevent that person from finding a loving life mate.

Do you?


Does this apply equally, to men, and should they get alimony?



Cash__
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Nov 2010
Age: 56
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,390
Location: Missouri

05 Sep 2016, 7:44 pm

People don't have to invent new gods. They just modify the ones they already have to suit their needs.



yournamehere
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Oct 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,673
Location: Roaming 150 square miles somewhere in north america

05 Sep 2016, 11:37 pm

You don't need to make any new ones, because you can just use one from somewhere else. There is even the absence of one. You can use that too.

If there is enough gods, and a lack their of to have arguments, disputes, feuds, and wars over, there is no need for more.



naturalplastic
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Aug 2010
Age: 70
Gender: Male
Posts: 35,189
Location: temperate zone

06 Sep 2016, 7:06 am

What several (including myself) said above: in the ancient times each local culture independently invented a pantheon of gods for its local little valley. And then the trend was to winnow down the number of deities down in each culture (from polytheism down to monotheism), and also gods came to be thought of as universal (the gods we conceive of are the Gods of the whole world, not just of our locality).So we went from a thousand isolated tribes each with its own family of dozens of gods down to one deity for the whole planet (and the debate switched arguing and fighting over the nature of that one god).

So we already have a surplus overstocked warehouse of unused deities. So why invent new ones?



kraftiekortie
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 4 Feb 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 87,510
Location: Queens, NYC

06 Sep 2016, 7:19 am

Some people just like the polytheistic approach to things.

They feel like it's beyond the Mundane; they feel a need to escape from the Mundane.

Hence, people like J.R.R. Tolkien.



BaalChatzaf
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Mar 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,050
Location: Monroe Twp. NJ

06 Sep 2016, 7:35 am

From the Wiki Article on La Place:

An earlier report, although without the mention of Laplace's name, is found in Antommarchi's The Last Moments of Napoleon (1825):[50]

Je m'entretenais avec L...... je le félicitais d'un ouvrage qu'il venait de publier et lui demandais comment le nom de Dieu, qui se reproduisait sans cesse sous la plume de Lagrange, ne s'était pas présenté une seule fois sous la sienne. C'est, me répondit-il, que je n'ai pas eu besoin de cette hypothèse. ("While speaking with L...... I congratulated him on a work which he had just published and asked him how the name of God, which appeared endlessly in the works of Lagrange, didn't occur even once in his. He replied that he had no need of that hypothesis.")

I


_________________
Socrates' Last Words: I drank what!! !?????


Pieplup
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Dec 2015
Age: 22
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 2,658
Location: Maine

06 Sep 2016, 8:10 am

What about Arceus?


_________________
[color=#0066cc]ever changing evolving and growing
I am pieplup i have level 3 autism and a number of severe mental illnesses. I am rarely active on here anymore.
I run a discord for moderate-severely autistic people if anyone would like to join. You can also contact me on discord @Pieplup


shlaifu
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 May 2014
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,659

06 Sep 2016, 9:18 am

I'd like to add: we stopped needing gods. laws are decided on by the people, and ethics and morality are personal decisions, and "good" or "bad" are decided through the normalizing value of money.
we figured out a way. it's far from perfect, but allows for more personal freedom and is adaptive in a way dogma isn't...


_________________
I can read facial expressions. I did the test.


GnosticBishop
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Nov 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,686

06 Sep 2016, 9:35 am

friedmacguffins wrote:
When did you quit stealing cars?


Soon.

I will stop when your wife stops paying me for them with blowjobs.

Regards
DL



GnosticBishop
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Nov 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,686

06 Sep 2016, 9:39 am

friedmacguffins wrote:
Quote:
I think it immoral for anyone to deny a person the right to leave a poor or abusive mate or marriage and also immoral to try to prevent that person from finding a loving life mate.

Do you?


Does this apply equally, to men, and should they get alimony?


Yes, when applicable just like it should be for women.

Equality under the law should insure this but many see the legal system skewed toward women in such cases.

Perhaps rightly so, --- as men do not seem to be stepping up to their duty to family.

Right now, almost 50% of all households are manned by single women.

Regards
DL



GnosticBishop
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Nov 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,686

06 Sep 2016, 9:45 am

Cash__ wrote:
People don't have to invent new gods. They just modify the ones they already have to suit their needs.


People seem to need immoral gods as Yahweh and Allah are both demonstrably immoral.

Modifications, like cutting the horns off of Satan, does not really change Satan.

Regards
DL



GnosticBishop
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Nov 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,686

06 Sep 2016, 9:47 am

yournamehere wrote:
You don't need to make any new ones, because you can just use one from somewhere else. There is even the absence of one. You can use that too.

If there is enough gods, and a lack their of to have arguments, disputes, feuds, and wars over, there is no need for more.


I hear you but think we n a new one who has decent moral values as compared to Yahweh and Allah.

Regards
DL



GnosticBishop
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Nov 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,686

06 Sep 2016, 9:49 am

naturalplastic wrote:
What several (including myself) said above: in the ancient times each local culture independently invented a pantheon of gods for its local little valley. And then the trend was to winnow down the number of deities down in each culture (from polytheism down to monotheism), and also gods came to be thought of as universal (the gods we conceive of are the Gods of the whole world, not just of our locality).So we went from a thousand isolated tribes each with its own family of dozens of gods down to one deity for the whole planet (and the debate switched arguing and fighting over the nature of that one god).

So we already have a surplus overstocked warehouse of unused deities. So why invent new ones?


To find a good one with morals that exceed what the mainstream presently follow.

That is a fairly easy task.

Regards
DL



GnosticBishop
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Nov 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,686

06 Sep 2016, 9:57 am

kraftiekortie wrote:
Some people just like the polytheistic approach to things.

They feel like it's beyond the Mundane; they feel a need to escape from the Mundane.

Hence, people like J.R.R. Tolkien.


The polytheistic approach works well for humans given the limits of our intellect but the notion of one leader lading is fairly sound. A ship can only have one Captain and a country can only have one King.

Regards
DL



GnosticBishop
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Nov 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,686

06 Sep 2016, 10:00 am

Pieplup wrote:
What about Arceus?


Just another wanabe.

Regards
DL



cron