The Time Has Come For «Fake News» Bashing...

Page 5 of 9 [ 130 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next

androbot01
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Sep 2014
Age: 55
Gender: Female
Posts: 6,746
Location: Kingston, Ontario, Canada

19 Feb 2017, 4:59 pm

Earthbound wrote:
androbot01 wrote:
Other news from a known fake source: Terrorists Strike in Sweden. :roll:


It's never fake news when Trump, his friends and supporters mention it. It only applies to when others do it. That's their messed up logic!

These people have literally no shame and act like they are the only ones that matter. It's sickening.


It's an attack on Western thinking and it doesn't just effect the States. Perhaps we've already fallen into the dark ages and are just enjoying the last glimpses of light.



Jacoby
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 10 Dec 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 14,284
Location: Arizona

19 Feb 2017, 5:03 pm

androbot01 wrote:
Jacoby wrote:
androbot01 wrote:
Other news from a known fake source: Terrorists Strike in Sweden. :roll:


Trump was referencing Sweden being the rape capital of the world after letting in hundreds of thousands of refugees, something a lot of Swedes are still in denial about.




He specifically mentions something that happened "last night." What was it?


It's an ongoing issue in Sweden

Trump probably watched a Tucker Carlson segment from the night before



androbot01
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Sep 2014
Age: 55
Gender: Female
Posts: 6,746
Location: Kingston, Ontario, Canada

19 Feb 2017, 5:08 pm

So now he is telling crowds what he watches on tv the night before? He is so full of crap it is unbelievable. Good luck with the new world order but I think you backed the wrong horse.



Jacoby
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 10 Dec 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 14,284
Location: Arizona

19 Feb 2017, 5:15 pm

Like I said, go visit Malmo and see for yourself who is lying. Sweden is the most extreme PC country in the world and they are in denial about the situation they have on their hands, European authorities have been covering up these migrant attacks for years now. Sweden is a small country that has invited hundreds of thousands of refugees from the most backward places on earth, they don't become multikulti peace loving progressives just because they moved to Sweden. These cover ups have been exposed in the UK and Germany too.



Earthbound
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 20 Feb 2016
Gender: Male
Posts: 756
Location: USA

19 Feb 2017, 5:24 pm

Trump can whine about the news being "fake", "unfair" and "hateful" to him all he wants. The fact of the matter-media needs Trump for ratings of this trainwreck, while Trump needs the attention for his ego. It's that simple.

Trump has been fact checked many many times- and he's blatantly lied or told half the story many times! He spews fake news all the time. Reporters need to call him out on it during conferences and interviews more. It's clear he just gaslights constantly and won't stop. It's sickening.



B19
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Jan 2013
Gender: Female
Posts: 9,993
Location: New Zealand

19 Feb 2017, 5:27 pm

Where did the fatuous claim that Sweden is the "rape capital of the world" originate? Breitbart?

The repetition of this claim completely ignores context: countries far more worthy of that claim don't have any effective laws against rape and condone it in a variety of ways, which support and ignore their rape culture. How many convictions for rape are represented in the statistics for Egypt, for example, or Saudi Arabia? Or in Isis controlled areas. None? If "proof" is conviction rates, then there is a deliberate or accidental implication that rape doesn't happen in countries that don't prosecute rapists. It's just silly. Breitbart wants to make the claim a meme, because Sweden is "the socialist enemy". The rape claim is false and ideologically driven. Repeating it to justify Trump's faux pas is sad.

Sweden has a very determined policy (in contrast to the rape-enabling countries) of encouraging victims to report, and actively pursues prosecution of sex offenders. This translates into higher rates of prosecution. It doesn't look the other way, or lash women who report sexual assault instead of investigating their claims.

Context counts, but not so much to some of Trump's more enthusiastic supporters, the ones who will defend anything he says however bizarre it seems.



Jacoby
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 10 Dec 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 14,284
Location: Arizona

19 Feb 2017, 5:35 pm

The statistics are discussed in the Tucker Carlson video, I would also watching the 60 Minutes report.



The_Walrus
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Jan 2010
Age: 31
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,878
Location: London

19 Feb 2017, 5:36 pm

New personal pledge: once a user gets to three lies or factual errors in a political thread, I won't respond to them again in that thread. I'm not going to force everyone to read tedious checks of every single claim, I think by the time you get to three then the message gets across that the person is either deliberately deceiving or so dismissive of intellectual rigour that it amounts to the same thing.

Jacoby wrote:
This isn't why the media made the term up for,

Tempted to call this two but I guess I'll let "the media made up the term" slide.

That's exactly the context it was repeatedly used in well before the election or Trump trying to call CNN "fake".

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the ... dcdb0e8b80
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/ ... fact-check
http://www.snopes.com/2016/01/14/fake-news-sites/

This CNN piece from before the election does include hyperpartisan outlets which only report good news for one side and bad news for the other. Again, you can't accuse any of the "mainstream" outlets Trump cries about of doing this. All of them publish negative stories about Democrats and positive stories about Republicans. Indeed, they all reported Comey's announcement that his department was re-opening their investigation into Clinton (you'll remember that, once again, they found no evidence of wrongdoing).

Quote:
The media in it's stupidity really doesn't comprehend the bubble they live in,

I think it's Trump and his supporters who don't comprehend the bubble they live in. Most Americans see Trump attacking ordinary journalists and roll their eyes. That's partly why his approval ratings are so low. No doubt there's a lot of mistrust of the mainstream media out there, but I wonder what percentage of Americans believe the Bowling Green massacre was real, that there was a terrorist attack in Sweden recently, or that the travel ban rollout was "smooth"?

Quote:
warranted full scale media narrative push across platforms(this is how you know their is coordination in the media).

:roll: No, the media reports on similar stories because they all want to report interesting stories. This happens all the time. One of them finds something good (or they all get it from the same source, like a press release, press conference, or an agency like Reuters), everyone hops on it hoping to engage their audience. For example, this story was reported by every outlet going. Is it a product of the New World Order?

2/3.
Quote:
It's ridiculous that the propagandists on CNN(reputable and moderate to who, you and no one else? :lol: )
Well, for example, CNN is the most widely consumed news source amongst affluent Europeans: http://www.turner.com/pressroom/cnn-eur ... news-brand
Politifact also give it a better rating than the other big four cable news networks (ABC, Fox, NBC): http://www.politifact.com/punditfact/tv/cnn/

ABC is not far behind, nor is CBS although that has a much smaller sample. 41% of statements on NBC are lies, while 59% are on Fox.

That's 3/3.



nurseangela
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Nov 2014
Gender: Female
Posts: 8,017
Location: Kansas

19 Feb 2017, 6:02 pm

The_Walrus wrote:
New personal pledge: once a user gets to three lies or factual errors in a political thread, I won't respond to them again in that thread. I'm not going to force everyone to read tedious checks of every single claim, I think by the time you get to three then the message gets across that the person is either deliberately deceiving or so dismissive of intellectual rigour that it amounts to the same thing.

Jacoby wrote:
This isn't why the media made the term up for,

Tempted to call this two but I guess I'll let "the media made up the term" slide.

That's exactly the context it was repeatedly used in well before the election or Trump trying to call CNN "fake".

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the ... dcdb0e8b80
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/ ... fact-check
http://www.snopes.com/2016/01/14/fake-news-sites/

This CNN piece from before the election does include hyperpartisan outlets which only report good news for one side and bad news for the other. Again, you can't accuse any of the "mainstream" outlets Trump cries about of doing this. All of them publish negative stories about Democrats and positive stories about Republicans. Indeed, they all reported Comey's announcement that his department was re-opening their investigation into Clinton (you'll remember that, once again, they found no evidence of wrongdoing).

Quote:
The media in it's stupidity really doesn't comprehend the bubble they live in,

I think it's Trump and his supporters who don't comprehend the bubble they live in. Most Americans see Trump attacking ordinary journalists and roll their eyes. That's partly why his approval ratings are so low. No doubt there's a lot of mistrust of the mainstream media out there, but I wonder what percentage of Americans believe the Bowling Green massacre was real, that there was a terrorist attack in Sweden recently, or that the travel ban rollout was "smooth"?

Quote:
warranted full scale media narrative push across platforms(this is how you know their is coordination in the media).

:roll: No, the media reports on similar stories because they all want to report interesting stories. This happens all the time. One of them finds something good (or they all get it from the same source, like a press release, press conference, or an agency like Reuters), everyone hops on it hoping to engage their audience. For example, this story was reported by every outlet going. Is it a product of the New World Order?

2/3.
Quote:
It's ridiculous that the propagandists on CNN(reputable and moderate to who, you and no one else? :lol: )
Well, for example, CNN is the most widely consumed news source amongst affluent Europeans: http://www.turner.com/pressroom/cnn-eur ... news-brand
Politifact also give it a better rating than the other big four cable news networks (ABC, Fox, NBC): http://www.politifact.com/punditfact/tv/cnn/

ABC is not far behind, nor is CBS although that has a much smaller sample. 41% of statements on NBC are lies, while 59% are on Fox.

That's 3/3.


What is this all about? (The not responding to people part)


_________________
Me grumpy?
I'm happiness challenged.

Your neurodiverse (Aspie) score: 83 of 200
Your neurotypical (non-autistic) score: 153 of 200 You are very likely neurotypical
Darn, I flunked.


Jacoby
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 10 Dec 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 14,284
Location: Arizona

19 Feb 2017, 6:16 pm

Here you go again with polls, I thought you would think of better arguments after getting egg on your face so many times appealing to the authority the agenda driven corporate media. We've had the argument a number of times and you were wrong and still can't admit it, it makes sense when you say 'affluent Europeans' all watch CNN why they are so misinformed. You can never understand the nuances of American politics by looking at polls, you really have no idea what you are talking about. 'Fake news' was a narrative that was simultaneously being pushed along with the 'Russians hacked the election' nonsense, the insinuations made by the media went well beyond spoof websites. All these media outlets didn't all the sudden get concerned about clickbait BS, there is an agenda in every narrative they push.

Trump's approval rating is fine, Rasmussen has him at 55% and he's about where Obama was at most of his presidency overall. If you believe Trump's approval rating is in the 30s or whatever then you probably believed Trump really was down 12% a week before the election. More Americans believe Trump than they do the mainstream media, this has been verified by the polls you love.

Bowling Green referred to terrorists who wanted to smuggle weapons into Iraq and to kill American soldiers in the middle east, you dismiss this as irrelevant as you grasp at anything negative about Trump. They are terrorists all the same, terrorists that commit attacks in other countries do not deserve in this country.

Since you don't live in this country and didn't even see what was going to happen in your own country I am not sure how you can say I live in a bubble, I've been spot on for how long now? For all the attempts a lecturing, I've been right which I am sure just absolutely kills you inside.

What about Comey now? I think you are letting your partisan butthurt spill over there.

about media collusion
Image
Image

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/5953
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/em ... #efmAD-AMa
https://www.wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/4664
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/em ... #efmAByAEV
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/em ... mAE6AF-AG1
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/em ... 6BAICwpCx4
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/844
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/em ... #efmBKsBMU
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/5502
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/em ... #efmAcTAdS
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/8460

politifact is biased garbage

http://i.imgur.com/Y9j7AKp.png

see I can google like you too



Jacoby
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 10 Dec 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 14,284
Location: Arizona

19 Feb 2017, 6:19 pm

bonus 'fact check' for the lulz

Image



B19
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Jan 2013
Gender: Female
Posts: 9,993
Location: New Zealand

19 Feb 2017, 6:49 pm

If memory serves me right, Trump used to claim his paternal ancestry was Swedish not German, but this was exposed as made up too. Trump creates these sorts of false facts, then accuses those who report that he fakes stuff of faking news.

Trump increasingly seems well out of his depth, in over his head, and that seems very dangerous to me, because Bannon is a Rasputin-like figure who hovers knowing Trump's weaknesses and how to exploit them.



Jacoby
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 10 Dec 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 14,284
Location: Arizona

19 Feb 2017, 7:03 pm

you folks make such incredible leaps

Trump said he Swedish once but it turns out upon further research he's German! Stop the presses, this man is not qualified for office! :roll:

fwiw the story I think was that Donald's father Fred Trump told everybody including his family that he was Swedish after WWII for decades apparently because he had a lot of Jewish tenants.



B19
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Jan 2013
Gender: Female
Posts: 9,993
Location: New Zealand

19 Feb 2017, 7:13 pm

What exactly do you mean Jacoby by your use of "you folks"?



Jacoby
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 10 Dec 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 14,284
Location: Arizona

19 Feb 2017, 7:20 pm

B19 wrote:
What exactly do you mean Jacoby by your use of "you folks"?


It's just a general identifier or whatever, heard it all my life. More appropriate than you people, you guys, y'all, etc. What did you think I meant?



B19
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Jan 2013
Gender: Female
Posts: 9,993
Location: New Zealand

19 Feb 2017, 7:27 pm

Sometimes on PPR it seems some posters deliberately start to use such blanket generalisations to shift the focus when a thread isn't turning out the way they want (ie supporting their version). "You people" "You folk" "You lefties" "You Republicans" "You morons".. it often seems purposefully dismissive on PPR (of alternative points of view and people who hold them, a kind of smear tactic).