Page 5 of 7 [ 102 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next

Lintar
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Nov 2012
Age: 57
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,777
Location: Victoria, Australia

25 Sep 2017, 10:53 pm

funeralxempire wrote:

Image

These Nazis. You should take your head out of your backside, it smells nicer and you won't be blind to the reality around you any longer. :wink:


Where is the context? The story? Who, exactly, are these people? I don't see any swastikas. What does this single photo prove?



KagamineLen
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Jun 2012
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,633

25 Sep 2017, 10:59 pm

Click this link to Vice News, and see for yourself what I speak of.

Lintar wrote:
funeralxempire wrote:

Image

These Nazis. You should take your head out of your backside, it smells nicer and you won't be blind to the reality around you any longer. :wink:


Where is the context? The story? Who, exactly, are these people? I don't see any swastikas. What does this single photo prove?



Raptor
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Mar 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,997
Location: Southeast U.S.A.

25 Sep 2017, 11:01 pm

KagamineLen wrote:
Uhm, if they support the rights of neo Nazis and Klansmen to march with automatic weapons and baseball bats while looking for a fight, yet turn around and state that the NFL is anti American because of some patriotic civil disobedience, I think it is fair to see where their hearts really are at. So actual neo Nazi and Klan membership is low, but there is a very large and very vocal crowd in their corner who tends to forget that their Klan and Nazi friends were highly armed, highly dangerous, and very much looking to stomp some heads in ways that go far beyond what the First Amendment actually covers. Trump himself claimed that they were "very fine people".

So, they may not be actual Nazis or Klansmen, but they certainly are sympathetic to their cause.


Oh, so they support free speech and the right to assemble (whether or not they support the actual cause) and that makes them Nazi sympathizers. Gee, thank's for the clarification. :roll:
Where did you see automatic weapons being carried?


_________________
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
- Thomas Jefferson


KagamineLen
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Jun 2012
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,633

25 Sep 2017, 11:14 pm

Raptor wrote:
KagamineLen wrote:
Uhm, if they support the rights of neo Nazis and Klansmen to march with automatic weapons and baseball bats while looking for a fight, yet turn around and state that the NFL is anti American because of some patriotic civil disobedience, I think it is fair to see where their hearts really are at. So actual neo Nazi and Klan membership is low, but there is a very large and very vocal crowd in their corner who tends to forget that their Klan and Nazi friends were highly armed, highly dangerous, and very much looking to stomp some heads in ways that go far beyond what the First Amendment actually covers. Trump himself claimed that they were "very fine people".

So, they may not be actual Nazis or Klansmen, but they certainly are sympathetic to their cause.


Oh, so they support free speech and the right to assemble (whether or not they support the actual cause) and that makes them Nazi sympathizers. Gee, thank's for the clarification. :roll:
Where did you see automatic weapons being carried?


Watch the video in this link. If you still think that what these men were up to is protected by the First Amendment, you have issues.



funeralxempire
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 40
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,119
Location: Right over your left shoulder

25 Sep 2017, 11:17 pm

Raptor wrote:
Oh, so they support free speech and the right to assemble (whether or not they support the actual cause) and that makes them Nazi sympathizers. Gee, thank's for the clarification. :roll:
Where did you see automatic weapons being carried?


Image
Image

https://qz.com/1053604/who-were-the-arm ... -military/
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world ... 90081.html
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/ar ... er/537087/
http://metro.co.uk/2017/08/13/white-sup ... s-6849661/

Those were the first four returns after searching 'charlottesville assault rifles' on Google. You're not really this uninformed on the topic you're attempting to argue over, are you?


_________________
The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the oppressing. —Malcolm X
If you feel useless, just remember the USA took four presidents, thousands of lives, trillions of dollars and 20 years to replace the Taliban with the Taliban.


SH90
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Jul 2016
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,558
Location: Florida

25 Sep 2017, 11:19 pm

No, automatic weapons was carried...



SZWell
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 23 Aug 2017
Age: 30
Gender: Male
Posts: 397
Location: Orlando, FL

25 Sep 2017, 11:21 pm

Chichikov wrote:
KagamineLen wrote:
Yeah. People like you referred to MLK as a terrorist in the 1960's and masturbated to Triumph of the Will in the 1940's.

You do realize you are guilty of the very sin you accuse me of, right? Oh, I forgot, my life does not matter because I refuse to do Roman salutes and Sieg Heils to the American flag.


All I did was point out that Trump isn't the racist you claim, and inform you that the FBI consider Antifa a terrorist organisation. I was just using facts to counteract your opinions.


Trump isn't racist because he's taking photos with black people?


_________________
Following my footsteps


funeralxempire
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 40
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,119
Location: Right over your left shoulder

25 Sep 2017, 11:28 pm

SH90 wrote:
No, automatic weapons was carried...


It's not unreasonable to call a semi-automatic rifle based on a select fire weapon an assault rifle. You can murder people just as effectively without an automatic or three round burst mode, let's not try to pretend otherwise. :roll:


_________________
The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the oppressing. —Malcolm X
If you feel useless, just remember the USA took four presidents, thousands of lives, trillions of dollars and 20 years to replace the Taliban with the Taliban.


KagamineLen
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Jun 2012
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,633

25 Sep 2017, 11:31 pm

SZWell wrote:
Chichikov wrote:
KagamineLen wrote:
Yeah. People like you referred to MLK as a terrorist in the 1960's and masturbated to Triumph of the Will in the 1940's.

You do realize you are guilty of the very sin you accuse me of, right? Oh, I forgot, my life does not matter because I refuse to do Roman salutes and Sieg Heils to the American flag.


All I did was point out that Trump isn't the racist you claim, and inform you that the FBI consider Antifa a terrorist organisation. I was just using facts to counteract your opinions.


Trump isn't racist because he's taking photos with black people?


That makes as much sense as saying Kim Jong Un loves the USA because he associated with Dennis Rodman.



SH90
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Jul 2016
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,558
Location: Florida

25 Sep 2017, 11:34 pm

funeralxempire wrote:
SH90 wrote:
No, automatic weapons was carried...


It's not unreasonable to call a semi-automatic rifle based on a select fire weapon an assault rifle. You can murder people just as effectively without an automatic or three round burst mode, let's not try to pretend otherwise. :roll:


Not an assault rifle either, without it being select fire. Looks like a sporting rifle, like the one in my avatar.



Raptor
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Mar 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,997
Location: Southeast U.S.A.

25 Sep 2017, 11:35 pm

KagamineLen wrote:
Raptor wrote:
KagamineLen wrote:
Uhm, if they support the rights of neo Nazis and Klansmen to march with automatic weapons and baseball bats while looking for a fight, yet turn around and state that the NFL is anti American because of some patriotic civil disobedience, I think it is fair to see where their hearts really are at. So actual neo Nazi and Klan membership is low, but there is a very large and very vocal crowd in their corner who tends to forget that their Klan and Nazi friends were highly armed, highly dangerous, and very much looking to stomp some heads in ways that go far beyond what the First Amendment actually covers. Trump himself claimed that they were "very fine people".

So, they may not be actual Nazis or Klansmen, but they certainly are sympathetic to their cause.


Oh, so they support free speech and the right to assemble (whether or not they support the actual cause) and that makes them Nazi sympathizers. Gee, thank's for the clarification. :roll:
Where did you see automatic weapons being carried?


Watch the video in this link. If you still think that what these men were up to is protected by the First Amendment, you have issues.


You just don't get it, do you?


_________________
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
- Thomas Jefferson


KagamineLen
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Jun 2012
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,633

25 Sep 2017, 11:38 pm

Raptor wrote:
KagamineLen wrote:
Raptor wrote:
KagamineLen wrote:
Uhm, if they support the rights of neo Nazis and Klansmen to march with automatic weapons and baseball bats while looking for a fight, yet turn around and state that the NFL is anti American because of some patriotic civil disobedience, I think it is fair to see where their hearts really are at. So actual neo Nazi and Klan membership is low, but there is a very large and very vocal crowd in their corner who tends to forget that their Klan and Nazi friends were highly armed, highly dangerous, and very much looking to stomp some heads in ways that go far beyond what the First Amendment actually covers. Trump himself claimed that they were "very fine people".

So, they may not be actual Nazis or Klansmen, but they certainly are sympathetic to their cause.


Oh, so they support free speech and the right to assemble (whether or not they support the actual cause) and that makes them Nazi sympathizers. Gee, thank's for the clarification. :roll:
Where did you see automatic weapons being carried?


Watch the video in this link. If you still think that what these men were up to is protected by the First Amendment, you have issues.


You just don't get it, do you?


I understand that you believe armed intimidation of racial minorities should be considered protected free speech. But only if white men are armed.



Raptor
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Mar 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,997
Location: Southeast U.S.A.

25 Sep 2017, 11:42 pm

funeralxempire wrote:
Raptor wrote:
Oh, so they support free speech and the right to assemble (whether or not they support the actual cause) and that makes them Nazi sympathizers. Gee, thank's for the clarification. :roll:
Where did you see automatic weapons being carried?


Image
Image

https://qz.com/1053604/who-were-the-arm ... -military/
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world ... 90081.html
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/ar ... er/537087/
http://metro.co.uk/2017/08/13/white-sup ... s-6849661/

Those were the first four returns after searching 'charlottesville assault rifles' on Google. You're not really this uninformed on the topic you're attempting to argue over, are you?


Those are CAR-15's (semi-auto M-4 clones) and not automatic weapon's.
There is a legal and technical difference. Just because they look scary to you doesn't make them automatic weapons. This scary guns topic has been discussed ad nauseam on this forum the whole 10 years that I've been on WP.


_________________
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
- Thomas Jefferson


Raptor
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Mar 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,997
Location: Southeast U.S.A.

25 Sep 2017, 11:44 pm

KagamineLen wrote:
Raptor wrote:
KagamineLen wrote:
Raptor wrote:
KagamineLen wrote:
Uhm, if they support the rights of neo Nazis and Klansmen to march with automatic weapons and baseball bats while looking for a fight, yet turn around and state that the NFL is anti American because of some patriotic civil disobedience, I think it is fair to see where their hearts really are at. So actual neo Nazi and Klan membership is low, but there is a very large and very vocal crowd in their corner who tends to forget that their Klan and Nazi friends were highly armed, highly dangerous, and very much looking to stomp some heads in ways that go far beyond what the First Amendment actually covers. Trump himself claimed that they were "very fine people".

So, they may not be actual Nazis or Klansmen, but they certainly are sympathetic to their cause.


Oh, so they support free speech and the right to assemble (whether or not they support the actual cause) and that makes them Nazi sympathizers. Gee, thank's for the clarification. :roll:
Where did you see automatic weapons being carried?


Watch the video in this link. If you still think that what these men were up to is protected by the First Amendment, you have issues.


You just don't get it, do you?


I understand that you believe armed intimidation of racial minorities should be considered protected free speech. But only if white men are armed.


Nice strawman fallacy attempt there...


_________________
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
- Thomas Jefferson


funeralxempire
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 40
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,119
Location: Right over your left shoulder

25 Sep 2017, 11:46 pm

Raptor wrote:

Those are CAR-15's (semi-auto M-4 clones) and not automatic weapon's.
There is a legal and technical difference. Just because they look scary to you doesn't make them automatic weapons. This scary guns topic has been discussed ad nauseam on this forum the whole 10 years that I've been on WP.


It's not unreasonable to call a semi-automatic rifle based on a select fire weapon an assault rifle. You're splitting hairs and lobbing childish insults because you have no valid point.


_________________
The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the oppressing. —Malcolm X
If you feel useless, just remember the USA took four presidents, thousands of lives, trillions of dollars and 20 years to replace the Taliban with the Taliban.


KagamineLen
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Jun 2012
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,633

25 Sep 2017, 11:47 pm

Raptor wrote:
KagamineLen wrote:
Raptor wrote:
KagamineLen wrote:
Raptor wrote:
KagamineLen wrote:
Uhm, if they support the rights of neo Nazis and Klansmen to march with automatic weapons and baseball bats while looking for a fight, yet turn around and state that the NFL is anti American because of some patriotic civil disobedience, I think it is fair to see where their hearts really are at. So actual neo Nazi and Klan membership is low, but there is a very large and very vocal crowd in their corner who tends to forget that their Klan and Nazi friends were highly armed, highly dangerous, and very much looking to stomp some heads in ways that go far beyond what the First Amendment actually covers. Trump himself claimed that they were "very fine people".

So, they may not be actual Nazis or Klansmen, but they certainly are sympathetic to their cause.


Oh, so they support free speech and the right to assemble (whether or not they support the actual cause) and that makes them Nazi sympathizers. Gee, thank's for the clarification. :roll:
Where did you see automatic weapons being carried?


Watch the video in this link. If you still think that what these men were up to is protected by the First Amendment, you have issues.


You just don't get it, do you?


I understand that you believe armed intimidation of racial minorities should be considered protected free speech. But only if white men are armed.


Nice strawman fallacy attempt there...


Stating what you implied back at you does not equate to a strawman argument. You are no normal troll. You are a master baiter.