The rise of right wing narrative in France.

Page 5 of 5 [ 73 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5

Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,751
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

05 Nov 2020, 4:20 pm

Nades wrote:
The_Walrus wrote:
Nades wrote:
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
The_Walrus wrote:
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
The_Walrus wrote:
In the West you’re much more likely to be killed by a far-right extremist than by an Islamic extremist.

So when Muslims come to the West, or Westerners convert, the majority of them do not engage in terrorism or anything resembling it.

If you read crazy stuff on Arabic Twitter then that’s one thing, but in practice, the Muslims in the West are broadly well-integrated and almost entirely non-violent. You can argue lots of different causes - people taking on the values of the culture they live in, prosperity creating liberals, or the Muslims who choose to migrate to the West generally also being Muslims who already admire Western values (a self-selection effect). But bluntly, your doomsaying is ignorant of what life is like in the West.


Then why many of the Muslim terrorists joining ISIS were living in Europe? And some were even born there.

It is estimated that 850-900 British nationals went to Syria or Iraq to fight for or be trained by radical groups.

In the UK there are 2.8 million Muslims (2011 census). So that’s about 0.03% of the Muslim population. Is that more or less than half?

In France, about twice as many citizens joined ISIS. Let’s say that’s 2,000. There are an estimated 3.35 million French Muslims. So that’s about 0.06%. Is that more or less than half?

In Belgium, 632 people joined ISIS. A low estimate for the number of Muslims in Belgium is 460,000. Is 632 more or less than half of 460,000?

In the Netherlands, 260 people joined ISIS. There are 870,000 Muslims in the Netherlands.

In Germany, 1,060 people joined ISIS. 1,060 is half of 2,120. Do you think there are more or less than 2,120 Muslims in Germany? There are 4.7m. So 1,060 is about 0.02%.

In Sweden, 300 people joined ISIS or Al-Nusra. There are 810,000 Muslims in Sweden.

You get the point.


Well, again... these represent the tip of the iceberg - by iceberg I mean a huge social/intellectual problem.

Those 0.02/0.03% are brainwashed by people and institutions who are way more than 0.02%. You don't become willing of decapitating people in an overnight.

So what's the healthy percentage of psychopaths in any given society? There should be a study on that. :mrgreen:


The percentages of Muslims who actually commit attacks are low, but the percentage who are against Western values are much higher. Almost a quarter want sharia law and 4% sympathise with suicide bombers.

It's those people who corrupt the mind of those who do attack and build a fairly large springboard for others to become unhinged.

I would say it's about time something is done about it. I think the worst quarter should be deported. It's fair to say that wanting to introduce sharia law is a fair cutoff to when I legitimately want someone removed from the community so about 25% seems right.



https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/201 ... sharia-law

To be honest the view that we should deport people for their views alone is one that is completely at odds with Western values. Are you going to deport yourself?


Views of violent ideology or wanting to implement sharia law are not western values so what's wrong with not wanting people who support them out of the West? Deportation isn't against Western values too. It happens all the time to ensure the out stability but not often enough or against the wrong people.

I would much rather a Romanian ex convict who served a year in prison who now works hard in a full time job and is overall a chill guy any day over someone with a clean criminal record who sympathises with suicide bombers or wants to implement abhorrent laws.


Sure mass deportation represents western values... the dark side of western values that we've been trying to purge since 1945.


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


Nades
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 8 Jan 2017
Age: 1935
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,132
Location: wales

05 Nov 2020, 4:27 pm

Kraichgauer wrote:
Nades wrote:
The_Walrus wrote:
Nades wrote:
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
The_Walrus wrote:
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
The_Walrus wrote:
In the West you’re much more likely to be killed by a far-right extremist than by an Islamic extremist.

So when Muslims come to the West, or Westerners convert, the majority of them do not engage in terrorism or anything resembling it.

If you read crazy stuff on Arabic Twitter then that’s one thing, but in practice, the Muslims in the West are broadly well-integrated and almost entirely non-violent. You can argue lots of different causes - people taking on the values of the culture they live in, prosperity creating liberals, or the Muslims who choose to migrate to the West generally also being Muslims who already admire Western values (a self-selection effect). But bluntly, your doomsaying is ignorant of what life is like in the West.


Then why many of the Muslim terrorists joining ISIS were living in Europe? And some were even born there.

It is estimated that 850-900 British nationals went to Syria or Iraq to fight for or be trained by radical groups.

In the UK there are 2.8 million Muslims (2011 census). So that’s about 0.03% of the Muslim population. Is that more or less than half?

In France, about twice as many citizens joined ISIS. Let’s say that’s 2,000. There are an estimated 3.35 million French Muslims. So that’s about 0.06%. Is that more or less than half?

In Belgium, 632 people joined ISIS. A low estimate for the number of Muslims in Belgium is 460,000. Is 632 more or less than half of 460,000?

In the Netherlands, 260 people joined ISIS. There are 870,000 Muslims in the Netherlands.

In Germany, 1,060 people joined ISIS. 1,060 is half of 2,120. Do you think there are more or less than 2,120 Muslims in Germany? There are 4.7m. So 1,060 is about 0.02%.

In Sweden, 300 people joined ISIS or Al-Nusra. There are 810,000 Muslims in Sweden.

You get the point.


Well, again... these represent the tip of the iceberg - by iceberg I mean a huge social/intellectual problem.

Those 0.02/0.03% are brainwashed by people and institutions who are way more than 0.02%. You don't become willing of decapitating people in an overnight.

So what's the healthy percentage of psychopaths in any given society? There should be a study on that. :mrgreen:


The percentages of Muslims who actually commit attacks are low, but the percentage who are against Western values are much higher. Almost a quarter want sharia law and 4% sympathise with suicide bombers.

It's those people who corrupt the mind of those who do attack and build a fairly large springboard for others to become unhinged.

I would say it's about time something is done about it. I think the worst quarter should be deported. It's fair to say that wanting to introduce sharia law is a fair cutoff to when I legitimately want someone removed from the community so about 25% seems right.



https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/201 ... sharia-law

To be honest the view that we should deport people for their views alone is one that is completely at odds with Western values. Are you going to deport yourself?


Views of violent ideology or wanting to implement sharia law are not western values so what's wrong with not wanting people who support them out of the West? Deportation isn't against Western values too. It happens all the time to ensure the out stability but not often enough or against the wrong people.

I would much rather a Romanian ex convict who served a year in prison who now works hard in a full time job and is overall a chill guy any day over someone with a clean criminal record who sympathises with suicide bombers or wants to implement abhorrent laws.


Sure mass deportation represents western values... the dark side of western values that we've been trying to purge since 1945.


The people who were purged in WW2 did A. Nothing to deserve it and B. They were killed in the most horrific of ways.

Deporting people who want to implement sharia law and support suicide bombings and the killing of millions of Jews are not comparable.

I also think that it's perfectly reasonable not to be forced to live around people who enjoy watching us get blown up and want to force us to live under Islamic law.



Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,751
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

05 Nov 2020, 5:51 pm

Nades wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Nades wrote:
The_Walrus wrote:
Nades wrote:
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
The_Walrus wrote:
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
The_Walrus wrote:
In the West you’re much more likely to be killed by a far-right extremist than by an Islamic extremist.

So when Muslims come to the West, or Westerners convert, the majority of them do not engage in terrorism or anything resembling it.

If you read crazy stuff on Arabic Twitter then that’s one thing, but in practice, the Muslims in the West are broadly well-integrated and almost entirely non-violent. You can argue lots of different causes - people taking on the values of the culture they live in, prosperity creating liberals, or the Muslims who choose to migrate to the West generally also being Muslims who already admire Western values (a self-selection effect). But bluntly, your doomsaying is ignorant of what life is like in the West.


Then why many of the Muslim terrorists joining ISIS were living in Europe? And some were even born there.

It is estimated that 850-900 British nationals went to Syria or Iraq to fight for or be trained by radical groups.

In the UK there are 2.8 million Muslims (2011 census). So that’s about 0.03% of the Muslim population. Is that more or less than half?

In France, about twice as many citizens joined ISIS. Let’s say that’s 2,000. There are an estimated 3.35 million French Muslims. So that’s about 0.06%. Is that more or less than half?

In Belgium, 632 people joined ISIS. A low estimate for the number of Muslims in Belgium is 460,000. Is 632 more or less than half of 460,000?

In the Netherlands, 260 people joined ISIS. There are 870,000 Muslims in the Netherlands.

In Germany, 1,060 people joined ISIS. 1,060 is half of 2,120. Do you think there are more or less than 2,120 Muslims in Germany? There are 4.7m. So 1,060 is about 0.02%.

In Sweden, 300 people joined ISIS or Al-Nusra. There are 810,000 Muslims in Sweden.

You get the point.


Well, again... these represent the tip of the iceberg - by iceberg I mean a huge social/intellectual problem.

Those 0.02/0.03% are brainwashed by people and institutions who are way more than 0.02%. You don't become willing of decapitating people in an overnight.

So what's the healthy percentage of psychopaths in any given society? There should be a study on that. :mrgreen:


The percentages of Muslims who actually commit attacks are low, but the percentage who are against Western values are much higher. Almost a quarter want sharia law and 4% sympathise with suicide bombers.

It's those people who corrupt the mind of those who do attack and build a fairly large springboard for others to become unhinged.

I would say it's about time something is done about it. I think the worst quarter should be deported. It's fair to say that wanting to introduce sharia law is a fair cutoff to when I legitimately want someone removed from the community so about 25% seems right.



https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/201 ... sharia-law

To be honest the view that we should deport people for their views alone is one that is completely at odds with Western values. Are you going to deport yourself?


Views of violent ideology or wanting to implement sharia law are not western values so what's wrong with not wanting people who support them out of the West? Deportation isn't against Western values too. It happens all the time to ensure the out stability but not often enough or against the wrong people.

I would much rather a Romanian ex convict who served a year in prison who now works hard in a full time job and is overall a chill guy any day over someone with a clean criminal record who sympathises with suicide bombers or wants to implement abhorrent laws.


Sure mass deportation represents western values... the dark side of western values that we've been trying to purge since 1945.


The people who were purged in WW2 did A. Nothing to deserve it and B. They were killed in the most horrific of ways.

Deporting people who want to implement sharia law and support suicide bombings and the killing of millions of Jews are not comparable.

I also think that it's perfectly reasonable not to be forced to live around people who enjoy watching us get blown up and want to force us to live under Islamic law.


The trouble is, the people calling for mass deportation often want to do it indiscriminately. They often could care less if the people they want deported are fanatic Muslims or not, just that they're Muslims.


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


kraftiekortie
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 4 Feb 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 87,510
Location: Queens, NYC

05 Nov 2020, 6:15 pm

Most Muslims just want to live in peace---just like the rest of us.



The_Walrus
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator

User avatar

Joined: 27 Jan 2010
Age: 31
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,878
Location: London

05 Nov 2020, 6:19 pm

If Western values exist at all (the concept of “the West” is a very dodgy one, and Western people do not all have the same values), then Freedom of Speech is one of them. Governments should not deport their citizens just because they say things we do not like. That is a barbaric view that belongs in the Victorian times. But, all the same, I will defend your right to say it.



kraftiekortie
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 4 Feb 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 87,510
Location: Queens, NYC

05 Nov 2020, 6:22 pm

Ever see that movie with that Subcontinental (either Indian, Pakistani, or Bangladeshi) guy who got access to Beatles' lyrics and music right before some sort of explosion took away memories of the Beatles from all people?



Nades
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 8 Jan 2017
Age: 1935
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,132
Location: wales

05 Nov 2020, 6:33 pm

Kraichgauer wrote:
The trouble is, the people calling for mass deportation often want to do it indiscriminately. They often could care less if the people they want deported are fanatic Muslims or not, just that they're Muslims.


The main problem is distinguishing between the ones that are happy to get along in the west and the ones that are not. Even being against homosexuality isn't grounds to remove someone from a community/society as being against homosexuality just goes hand in hand with most religions in general. What doesn't though, and where the line is drawn with me are people who's ideologies and extreme view revolve around dismissing extremely violent acts, the desire to subjugate the general public with religious laws and just being violent in the name of religion.

Identifying the worst of the worst isn't as hard as it appears. The majority of terrorists who have later carried out attacks appeared to have been on the radar of intelligence agencies long before their attacks. It's just the ones that don't attack but are still the bad apples that start to rot the others near them. If they were very easy to identify then I have no issue whatsoever with sending them back to their home country assuming they have dual citizenship or assuming they don't, just shoving them on an island where they can't corrupt others with their condoning of suicide bombings and sharia fetish. Unfortunately if the stats extrapolate among the entire Muslim community correctly, then we need a very large island for 750k people or a lot of planes on charter.

The_Walrus. Freedom of speech doesn't extend to hate speech. Openly supporting bombings that kill kids for example certainly fits into hate speech and it's already illegal. As for Sharia law, while not hate speech (it's not even speech at all, just a concept) it already breeches a lot of other human rights laws and once a group of people try and push for legislation changes that breeches the rights of others then those individuals need addressing. The rights of person A ends when they actively try to undermine the rights of person B, C and D. If they're not native to a country and are wanting to trample the rights of the natives, then just get rid of them. If I went to India and showed support for recent terrorist attacks in their country, I would expect to end up on the first flight back home.



Hollywood_Guy
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 11 Nov 2017
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,283
Location: US

05 Nov 2020, 10:02 pm

Nades wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
The trouble is, the people calling for mass deportation often want to do it indiscriminately. They often could care less if the people they want deported are fanatic Muslims or not, just that they're Muslims.


The main problem is distinguishing between the ones that are happy to get along in the west and the ones that are not. Even being against homosexuality isn't grounds to remove someone from a community/society as being against homosexuality just goes hand in hand with most religions in general. What doesn't though, and where the line is drawn with me are people who's ideologies and extreme view revolve around dismissing extremely violent acts, the desire to subjugate the general public with religious laws and just being violent in the name of religion.

Identifying the worst of the worst isn't as hard as it appears. The majority of terrorists who have later carried out attacks appeared to have been on the radar of intelligence agencies long before their attacks. It's just the ones that don't attack but are still the bad apples that start to rot the others near them. If they were very easy to identify then I have no issue whatsoever with sending them back to their home country assuming they have dual citizenship or assuming they don't, just shoving them on an island where they can't corrupt others with their condoning of suicide bombings and sharia fetish. Unfortunately if the stats extrapolate among the entire Muslim community correctly, then we need a very large island for 750k people or a lot of planes on charter.

The_Walrus. Freedom of speech doesn't extend to hate speech. Openly supporting bombings that kill kids for example certainly fits into hate speech and it's already illegal. As for Sharia law, while not hate speech (it's not even speech at all, just a concept) it already breeches a lot of other human rights laws and once a group of people try and push for legislation changes that breeches the rights of others then those individuals need addressing. The rights of person A ends when they actively try to undermine the rights of person B, C and D. If they're not native to a country and are wanting to trample the rights of the natives, then just get rid of them. If I went to India and showed support for recent terrorist attacks in their country, I would expect to end up on the first flight back home.


I don't know if this is just American or if it's in Europe too (especially as most European countries have actual hate speech laws), but there's a distinction between saying "I hate x" versus "kill all x" as one is an expression and the other goes beyond and is an explicit direct call to violence or committing a crime.



The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 44
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,664
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.

06 Nov 2020, 5:54 am

Nades wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
The trouble is, the people calling for mass deportation often want to do it indiscriminately. They often could care less if the people they want deported are fanatic Muslims or not, just that they're Muslims.


The main problem is distinguishing between the ones that are happy to get along in the west and the ones that are not. Even being against homosexuality isn't grounds to remove someone from a community/society as being against homosexuality just goes hand in hand with most religions in general. What doesn't though, and where the line is drawn with me are people who's ideologies and extreme view revolve around dismissing extremely violent acts, the desire to subjugate the general public with religious laws and just being violent in the name of religion.

Identifying the worst of the worst isn't as hard as it appears. The majority of terrorists who have later carried out attacks appeared to have been on the radar of intelligence agencies long before their attacks. It's just the ones that don't attack but are still the bad apples that start to rot the others near them. If they were very easy to identify then I have no issue whatsoever with sending them back to their home country assuming they have dual citizenship or assuming they don't, just shoving them on an island where they can't corrupt others with their condoning of suicide bombings and sharia fetish. Unfortunately if the stats extrapolate among the entire Muslim community correctly, then we need a very large island for 750k people or a lot of planes on charter.

The_Walrus. Freedom of speech doesn't extend to hate speech. Openly supporting bombings that kill kids for example certainly fits into hate speech and it's already illegal. As for Sharia law, while not hate speech (it's not even speech at all, just a concept) it already breeches a lot of other human rights laws and once a group of people try and push for legislation changes that breeches the rights of others then those individuals need addressing. The rights of person A ends when they actively try to undermine the rights of person B, C and D. If they're not native to a country and are wanting to trample the rights of the natives, then just get rid of them. If I went to India and showed support for recent terrorist attacks in their country, I would expect to end up on the first flight back home.



The thing is, even their home countries don't want those back. Egypt for instance certainly doesn't want more Muslim Brotherhood members after the mass-exile.

You can compare the sharia law demanders to separatists such as the pro-ETA people in Spain or anti-Federal in US, do the pro ETA have the right to still have Spanish citizenship? Can they have their political parties ? can they become politicians? I don't think so. Why would they have the right to vote if they don't even believe in the whole country?

If you don't even recognize the very foundation of your host country then it shouldn't recognize you as a citizen either.