kraftiekortie wrote:
Bottom line is:
There are 4,000 or so unaccompanied children living under prison-like conditions. We have to do something about that. They don't deserve to live under these conditions; they didn't commit a crime.
Of course not, but what is the ramification of simply literally opening the borders?
These children are being cynically used as the thin edge of the wedge to allow broader immigration.
America is not my country, so I am not arguing either way.
I am simply making observations.
It will be 'interesting' to see how the Democrats handle the situation.
kraftiekortie wrote:
This has nothing to do with liberalism, conservatism, Democratic, Republican, whatever. It's a manner of being humanitarian.
Most countries have immigration quotas.
Is it feasible/practical/reasonable to let *everyone* who wants to migrate into America to do so?
Even the Democrats realise this can't be allowed to happen.
kraftiekortie wrote:
People want to come to the United States to escape their situations in their own countries.
What would you do if you were a Salvadorean who's been threatened with death by a drug cartel? And can't obtain employment? And can't feed your family? Look at it from their viewpoints, too.
A valid point of view, but are you saying there should be no immigration policy?