Chibi_Neko wrote:
It made perfect sense. The fact that you never answered the question tells me that you want these women to do what you don't. You are the one that wants the babies so badly, so you should take them. All pro-lifers that try to force women to have unwanted babies should be obligated to take the kids in after they are born.
No, Ancalgon is right, your suggestion makes no sense whatsoever.
Quote:
It's common sense not to kill off the kids because they are under the category living-breathing people, 2 month-old fetuses are not.
Are you being deliberately obtuse? The point of the pro-life position is the belief that 2-month-old fetuses
are human beings with rights.
Quote:
4. We live in a world of reality. People who are against abortion for religious reasons should only practice what the preach for themselves ONLY. If some religious person tries to tell me what to do and what I am worth, I am going to speak up about it, if they don't interfere with my life, I won't say a word to them. In fact it is the religious people that kick up all the fuss, not the other way around.
We live in a world of reality. People who are against murder for religious reasons should only practice what they preach for themselves ONLY.
Quote:
You can be pro-life and pro-choice at the same time. My cousin is one of those people. She thinks abortion is wrong and would not do it herself, but also thinks its wrong to impose her view on to anyone else and that people need to make up their own minds on what is best for 'them' not herself.
If you believe abortion is wrong and that it is literally murder, then it makes all the sense in the world to prevent other people from doing it. You can't say "Oh, I think murder is wrong, so I would never kill anyone, but it's also wrong to impose my view on anyone else and people need to make up their own minds on whether or not they should murder."
It looks to me like the pro-lifers and pro-choicers just keep talking past each other. Is it
that freaking hard to figure out what the other side's opinion is? Each side has solid reasoning, but begins from different premises. Argue about the premises rather than the end conclusion, because you aren't getting anywhere by skipping to the end.
_________________
WAR IS PEACE
FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH