TW1ZTY wrote:
Well seeing how he views all white people as the devil I bet he would OK with the idea. That's pretty much how genocide always starts you know. All it takes is a group of people who demonize another group of people just like when the Nazis decided that the Jews were all evil and needed to be destroyed.
Malcolm X's trip to Mecca:
An entry dated April 17, 1964, describes the crowds praying as being of "all colours, bowing in unison" and that watching them he was "not conscious of colour for the first time in my life". He added: "The whites don't seem white."
Other entries show how he then realised that it was not race but a person's
intentions that mattered. "Out of the sudden darkness comes sudden light. My, how fortune can change," he wrote.
On his return to America he broke with the hardline Nation of Islam and formed the Organisation of Afro-American Unity, an act that many believe led to his assassination in New York on Feb 21, 1965.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldn ... hange.htmlI believe your view of X, forgive me if I'm wrong, comes more from how you've heard people around you speak of him. I can only imagine in places like Georgia, from how you've described it, someone like X would be supremely demonized. X never preached genocide and towards the end of his life he saw intent rather than race as the driving factor.
The difference being MLK was optimistic to a fault, whereas X didn't buy into optimism. MLK believed in trying to get oppressors to give in to their better angels, while X believed you have to be the change to stop oppression and rather than being thankful and relying on only hope - to focus on you and your people.
I guess you could be right. My dislike of him probably comes from what I have heard about him more than what he actually did as a person.