Important notice: Understanding attacks on homosexuality

Page 6 of 14 [ 209 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 ... 14  Next

leejosepho
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Sep 2009
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,011
Location: 200 miles south of Little Rock

23 Feb 2011, 5:18 pm

iamnotaparakeet wrote:
Look: I was not preaching to anyone when I said things in opposition to homosexuality, I was providing rebuttal ...

Had rebuttal been requested?

iamnotaparakeet wrote:
I don't normally spend a lot of time arguing with people about this but ...

Personally, I have found my own allegedly-rational mind can typically end up erroneously justifying wrong action.

iamnotaparakeet wrote:
[Somebody] and his friends elicited this from me ...

Blaming the other guy, eh?!

iamnotaparakeet wrote:
Now his friends have since ...

Yeah, many lessons were hard for me to finally learn also. However, our teacher is very patient and will let us take just as long as we wish -- Whose will be done? -- to finally learn them.


_________________
I began looking for someone like me when I was five ...
My search ended at 59 ... right here on WrongPlanet.
==================================


leejosepho
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Sep 2009
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,011
Location: 200 miles south of Little Rock

23 Feb 2011, 5:20 pm

MidlifeAspie wrote:
The official stance will be released shortly as it is still being tweaked. In the context of this conversation, attacking Christians as a group is prohibited and attacking Homosexuals as a group is prohibited.

Personal, regular-member, unsolicited opinion: Very bad idea!

Hobbled horses never learn to run gracefully on their own.


_________________
I began looking for someone like me when I was five ...
My search ended at 59 ... right here on WrongPlanet.
==================================


Asp-Z
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Dec 2009
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,018

23 Feb 2011, 5:24 pm

I believe my image has been censored. If you wanna see what it was, feel free to PM me.



skafather84
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Mar 2006
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,848
Location: New Orleans, LA

23 Feb 2011, 5:25 pm

MidlifeAspie wrote:
In the context of this conversation, attacking Christians as a group is prohibited and attacking Homosexuals as a group is prohibited.


Except only one of those groups is a choice.


_________________
Wherever they burn books they will also, in the end, burn human beings. ~Heinrich Heine, Almansor, 1823

?I wouldn't recommend sex, drugs or insanity for everyone, but they've always worked for me.? - Hunter S. Thompson


leejosepho
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Sep 2009
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,011
Location: 200 miles south of Little Rock

23 Feb 2011, 5:27 pm

MidlifeAspie wrote:
iamnotaparakeet wrote:
And now, from moderators, a call to unilateral censorship? Oy veh.


Would you mind expanding on what you mean?

@'keet: Have you withdrawn your question? I cannot find it anywhere.


_________________
I began looking for someone like me when I was five ...
My search ended at 59 ... right here on WrongPlanet.
==================================


MidlifeAspie
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Nov 2010
Age: 49
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,016

23 Feb 2011, 5:30 pm

skafather84 wrote:
Except only one of those groups is a choice.


This is a debatable opinion and not one I am going to engage. I would do it poor service were I to try. Suffice it to say, allowing attacks on any group, (regardless of believed choice or inherent to birth and culture) does not serve the purpose of WrongPlanet. First and foremost this is a support site for Autistic individuals and those who love them. The political debate comes a distant second to that. On a support site, nobody should be attacking anybody and the Mods will do their best to ensure that.


_________________
Be careful when you fight the monsters, lest you become one.


iamnotaparakeet
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Jul 2007
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 25,091
Location: 0.5 Galactic radius

23 Feb 2011, 5:30 pm

MidlifeAspie wrote:
iamnotaparakeet wrote:
MidlifeAspie wrote:
iamnotaparakeet wrote:
And now, from moderators, a call to unilateral censorship? Oy veh.


Would you mind expanding on what you mean?


What I keep hearing is that only one side of any debate upon the topic of homosexuality is allowed to provide their perspectives, at least from the former moderators DW and Lee it sounds like that. What is the official stance?


The official stance will be released shortly as it is still being tweaked. In the context of this conversation, attacking Christians as a group is prohibited and attacking Homosexuals as a group is prohibited.


That's fine, and what of Christianity as a religion and homosexuality as a whatever-the-heck-jargon?



iamnotaparakeet
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Jul 2007
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 25,091
Location: 0.5 Galactic radius

23 Feb 2011, 5:30 pm

leejosepho wrote:
MidlifeAspie wrote:
iamnotaparakeet wrote:
And now, from moderators, a call to unilateral censorship? Oy veh.


Would you mind expanding on what you mean?

@'keet: Have you withdrawn your question? I cannot find it anywhere.


I'm not sure... wait, what?



MidlifeAspie
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Nov 2010
Age: 49
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,016

23 Feb 2011, 5:31 pm

iamnotaparakeet wrote:
That's fine, and what of Christianity as a religion and homosexuality as a whatever-the-heck-jargon?


I don't understand the question, sorry :?


_________________
Be careful when you fight the monsters, lest you become one.


skafather84
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Mar 2006
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,848
Location: New Orleans, LA

23 Feb 2011, 5:33 pm

MidlifeAspie wrote:
skafather84 wrote:
Except only one of those groups is a choice.


This is a debatable opinion and not one I am going to engage.


True...not many people can be broken out of habits and mythology introduced at early age without it being stated as false by those same authories (like Santa) so religion to many people may be as much of a choice as homosexuality for many.


Also: I think something that might throw a wrench into people's conceptions about homosexuality are bisexuals who can pretty much go for whatever they want. That'd most certainly confuse people since most have trouble seeing beyond basic dualities.


_________________
Wherever they burn books they will also, in the end, burn human beings. ~Heinrich Heine, Almansor, 1823

?I wouldn't recommend sex, drugs or insanity for everyone, but they've always worked for me.? - Hunter S. Thompson


iamnotaparakeet
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Jul 2007
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 25,091
Location: 0.5 Galactic radius

23 Feb 2011, 5:35 pm

leejosepho wrote:
iamnotaparakeet wrote:
Look: I was not preaching to anyone when I said things in opposition to homosexuality, I was providing rebuttal ...

Had rebuttal been requested?

Should accusations be left unanswered?

leejosepho wrote:
iamnotaparakeet wrote:
I don't normally spend a lot of time arguing with people about this but ...

Personally, I have found my own allegedly-rational mind can typically end up erroneously justifying wrong action.

I'm sorry for you.

leejosepho wrote:
iamnotaparakeet wrote:
[Somebody] and his friends elicited this from me ...

Blaming the other guy, eh?!

I plead Calvinism.


leejosepho wrote:
iamnotaparakeet wrote:
Now his friends have since ...

Yeah, many lessons were hard for me to finally learn also. However, our teacher is very patient and will let us take just as long as we wish -- Whose will be done? -- to finally learn them.

You know, I'm kinda getting tired of alliterations from the Bible being used as a pacifier.



leejosepho
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Sep 2009
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,011
Location: 200 miles south of Little Rock

23 Feb 2011, 5:38 pm

iamnotaparakeet wrote:
leejosepho wrote:
MidlifeAspie wrote:
iamnotaparakeet wrote:
And now, from moderators, a call to unilateral censorship? Oy veh.


Would you mind expanding on what you mean?

@'keet: Have you withdrawn your question? I cannot find it anywhere.


I'm not sure... wait, what?

I cannot find the post where you had first asked, "And now, from moderators, a call to unilateral censorship? Oy veh."


_________________
I began looking for someone like me when I was five ...
My search ended at 59 ... right here on WrongPlanet.
==================================


iamnotaparakeet
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Jul 2007
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 25,091
Location: 0.5 Galactic radius

23 Feb 2011, 5:38 pm

MidlifeAspie wrote:
iamnotaparakeet wrote:
That's fine, and what of Christianity as a religion and homosexuality as a whatever-the-heck-jargon?


I don't understand the question, sorry :?


I have been repeatedly accused of attacking homosexuality, within the base of this thread even, so I want to know if the definitions being written will proclaim me as guilty by definition of an offense against the terms of service of this site.



iamnotaparakeet
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Jul 2007
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 25,091
Location: 0.5 Galactic radius

23 Feb 2011, 5:40 pm

leejosepho wrote:
iamnotaparakeet wrote:
leejosepho wrote:
MidlifeAspie wrote:
iamnotaparakeet wrote:
And now, from moderators, a call to unilateral censorship? Oy veh.


Would you mind expanding on what you mean?

@'keet: Have you withdrawn your question? I cannot find it anywhere.


I'm not sure... wait, what?

I cannot find the post where you had first asked, "And now, from moderators, a call to unilateral censorship? Oy veh."


It was at the end of one of my replies, that snippet is just one which was abstracted. I think it was on page 5 or 6 or something of the sort.



MidlifeAspie
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Nov 2010
Age: 49
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,016

23 Feb 2011, 5:44 pm

iamnotaparakeet wrote:
I have been repeatedly accused of attacking homosexuality, within the base of this thread even, so I want to know if the definitions being written will proclaim me as guilty by definition of an offense against the terms of service of this site.


To be honest I never waded into the fray far enough to see what you had written specifically. I will assure you that the new clarification of the rules will not be written and imposed retroactively.


_________________
Be careful when you fight the monsters, lest you become one.


iamnotaparakeet
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Jul 2007
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 25,091
Location: 0.5 Galactic radius

23 Feb 2011, 5:45 pm

MidlifeAspie wrote:
iamnotaparakeet wrote:
I have been repeatedly accused of attacking homosexuality, within the base of this thread even, so I want to know if the definitions being written will proclaim me as guilty by definition of an offense against the terms of service of this site.


To be honest I never waded into the fray far enough to see what you had written specifically. I will assure you that the new clarification of the rules will not be written and imposed retroactively.


Thank you.