11th Circuit Court of Appeals slams Individual Mandate

Page 6 of 7 [ 97 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next

JakobVirgil
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Feb 2011
Age: 52
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,744
Location: yes

18 Aug 2011, 7:06 pm

Inuyasha wrote:
grrr bbrrrapptt ning ning ningg walla walla zoop zoop


I don't understand is calling someone a partisan lunatic a complement when it comes from you?


_________________
?We must not look at goblin men,
We must not buy their fruits:
Who knows upon what soil they fed
Their hungry thirsty roots??

http://jakobvirgil.blogspot.com/


Inuyasha
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Jan 2009
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,745

18 Aug 2011, 7:09 pm

JakobVirgil wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
grrr bbrrrapptt ning ning ningg walla walla zoop zoop


I don't understand is calling someone a partisan lunatic a complement when it comes from you?


So you think it's okay to call conservatives terrorists because they think that we can't keep doing out of control spending.



JakobVirgil
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Feb 2011
Age: 52
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,744
Location: yes

18 Aug 2011, 7:13 pm

Inuyasha wrote:
JakobVirgil wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
grrr bbrrrapptt ning ning ningg walla walla zoop zoop


I don't understand is calling someone a partisan lunatic a complement when it comes from you?


So you think it's okay to call conservatives terrorists because they think that we can't keep doing out of control spending.


when they hold the country hostage yeah sure.
But of course with my tongue in my cheek.
Are you going to start lecturing on crazy rhetoric?
you should that the only kind you use.


_________________
?We must not look at goblin men,
We must not buy their fruits:
Who knows upon what soil they fed
Their hungry thirsty roots??

http://jakobvirgil.blogspot.com/


Inuyasha
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Jan 2009
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,745

18 Aug 2011, 7:18 pm

JakobVirgil wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
JakobVirgil wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
grrr bbrrrapptt ning ning ningg walla walla zoop zoop


I don't understand is calling someone a partisan lunatic a complement when it comes from you?


So you think it's okay to call conservatives terrorists because they think that we can't keep doing out of control spending.


when they hold the country hostage yeah sure.
But of course with my tongue in my cheek.
Are you going to start lecturing on crazy rhetoric?
you should that the only kind you use.


Thing is the Republicans had a deal of $800 billion in new revenue and $4 trillion in cuts, the Republicans presented a plan that did that, then Obama said after the Republicans had fulfilled that which they had agreed to, that he wanted another $400 billion in revenue on top of the $800 billion. That is what is called moving the goalpost, Obama had no intention of having a deal, he wanted to use the debt ceiling situation for political gains. The Republicans passed multiple other solutions in the House, and the Democrats tabled them in the Senate, wouldn't even allow them to be debated on the Senate floor.

So saying the Republicans was holding the country hostage is disingenious especially since we have yet to see this "plan" Obama kept saying he had.



JakobVirgil
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Feb 2011
Age: 52
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,744
Location: yes

18 Aug 2011, 7:20 pm

Inuyasha wrote:
JakobVirgil wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
JakobVirgil wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
grrr bbrrrapptt ning ning ningg walla walla zoop zoop


I don't understand is calling someone a partisan lunatic a complement when it comes from you?


So you think it's okay to call conservatives terrorists because they think that we can't keep doing out of control spending.


when they hold the country hostage yeah sure.
But of course with my tongue in my cheek.
Are you going to start lecturing on crazy rhetoric?
you should that the only kind you use.


Thing is the Republicans had a deal of $800 billion in new revenue and $4 trillion in cuts, the Republicans presented a plan that did that, then Obama said after the Republicans had fulfilled that which they had agreed to, that he wanted another $400 billion in revenue on top of the $800 billion. That is what is called moving the goalpost, Obama had no intention of having a deal, he wanted to use the debt ceiling situation for political gains. The Republicans passed multiple other solutions in the House, and the Democrats tabled them in the Senate, wouldn't even allow them to be debated on the Senate floor.

So saying the Republicans was holding the country hostage is disingenious especially since we have yet to see this "plan" Obama kept saying he had.


sure that is exactly how it went down . . .
on fox news the rest of us (in reality )
saw a completely different story.


_________________
?We must not look at goblin men,
We must not buy their fruits:
Who knows upon what soil they fed
Their hungry thirsty roots??

http://jakobvirgil.blogspot.com/


Inuyasha
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Jan 2009
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,745

18 Aug 2011, 7:58 pm

JakobVirgil wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
JakobVirgil wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
JakobVirgil wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
grrr bbrrrapptt ning ning ningg walla walla zoop zoop


I don't understand is calling someone a partisan lunatic a complement when it comes from you?


So you think it's okay to call conservatives terrorists because they think that we can't keep doing out of control spending.


when they hold the country hostage yeah sure.
But of course with my tongue in my cheek.
Are you going to start lecturing on crazy rhetoric?
you should that the only kind you use.


Thing is the Republicans had a deal of $800 billion in new revenue and $4 trillion in cuts, the Republicans presented a plan that did that, then Obama said after the Republicans had fulfilled that which they had agreed to, that he wanted another $400 billion in revenue on top of the $800 billion. That is what is called moving the goalpost, Obama had no intention of having a deal, he wanted to use the debt ceiling situation for political gains. The Republicans passed multiple other solutions in the House, and the Democrats tabled them in the Senate, wouldn't even allow them to be debated on the Senate floor.

So saying the Republicans was holding the country hostage is disingenious especially since we have yet to see this "plan" Obama kept saying he had.


sure that is exactly how it went down . . .
on fox news the rest of us (in reality )
saw a completely different story.


And you are dumb enough to believe the DNC's lapdogs.



JakobVirgil
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Feb 2011
Age: 52
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,744
Location: yes

18 Aug 2011, 8:02 pm

Inuyasha wrote:
JakobVirgil wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
JakobVirgil wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
JakobVirgil wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
grrr bbrrrapptt ning ning ningg walla walla zoop zoop


I don't understand is calling someone a partisan lunatic a complement when it comes from you?


So you think it's okay to call conservatives terrorists because they think that we can't keep doing out of control spending.


when they hold the country hostage yeah sure.
But of course with my tongue in my cheek.
Are you going to start lecturing on crazy rhetoric?
you should that the only kind you use.


Thing is the Republicans had a deal of $800 billion in new revenue and $4 trillion in cuts, the Republicans presented a plan that did that, then Obama said after the Republicans had fulfilled that which they had agreed to, that he wanted another $400 billion in revenue on top of the $800 billion. That is what is called moving the goalpost, Obama had no intention of having a deal, he wanted to use the debt ceiling situation for political gains. The Republicans passed multiple other solutions in the House, and the Democrats tabled them in the Senate, wouldn't even allow them to be debated on the Senate floor.

So saying the Republicans was holding the country hostage is disingenious especially since we have yet to see this "plan" Obama kept saying he had.


sure that is exactly how it went down . . .
on fox news the rest of us (in reality )
saw a completely different story.


And you are dumb enough to believe the DNC's lapdogs.

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:


_________________
?We must not look at goblin men,
We must not buy their fruits:
Who knows upon what soil they fed
Their hungry thirsty roots??

http://jakobvirgil.blogspot.com/


Inuyasha
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Jan 2009
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,745

18 Aug 2011, 8:07 pm

JakobVirgil wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
JakobVirgil wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
JakobVirgil wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
JakobVirgil wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
grrr bbrrrapptt ning ning ningg walla walla zoop zoop


I don't understand is calling someone a partisan lunatic a complement when it comes from you?


So you think it's okay to call conservatives terrorists because they think that we can't keep doing out of control spending.


when they hold the country hostage yeah sure.
But of course with my tongue in my cheek.
Are you going to start lecturing on crazy rhetoric?
you should that the only kind you use.


Thing is the Republicans had a deal of $800 billion in new revenue and $4 trillion in cuts, the Republicans presented a plan that did that, then Obama said after the Republicans had fulfilled that which they had agreed to, that he wanted another $400 billion in revenue on top of the $800 billion. That is what is called moving the goalpost, Obama had no intention of having a deal, he wanted to use the debt ceiling situation for political gains. The Republicans passed multiple other solutions in the House, and the Democrats tabled them in the Senate, wouldn't even allow them to be debated on the Senate floor.

So saying the Republicans was holding the country hostage is disingenious especially since we have yet to see this "plan" Obama kept saying he had.


sure that is exactly how it went down . . .
on fox news the rest of us (in reality )
saw a completely different story.


And you are dumb enough to believe the DNC's lapdogs.

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:


I'm talking about people like Chris Matthews whom got a shiver up his leg listening to Obama speak.



Orwell
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Aug 2007
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,518
Location: Room 101

18 Aug 2011, 11:35 pm

Inuyasha wrote:
Thanks for proving beyond a reasonable doubt that you are a partisan lunatic.

Are you talking to yourself again?


_________________
WAR IS PEACE
FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH


Inuyasha
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Jan 2009
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,745

18 Aug 2011, 11:38 pm

Orwell wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
Thanks for proving beyond a reasonable doubt that you are a partisan lunatic.

Are you talking to yourself again?


No, though I know you wish I was crazy so your delusional world view would actually be real. Unfortunately for you, I'm not crazy.



androbot2084
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Mar 2011
Age: 65
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,447

19 Aug 2011, 3:02 am

The Religious Right says that socialized medicine is evil. So how come ancient Israel had socialized medicine?



zer0netgain
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Mar 2009
Age: 58
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,615

19 Aug 2011, 7:24 am

androbot2084 wrote:
The Religious Right says that socialized medicine is evil. So how come ancient Israel had socialized medicine?


Proof?



androbot2084
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Mar 2011
Age: 65
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,447

19 Aug 2011, 11:28 am

The ancient Israel government imposed a ten percent tax called a tithe. This tithe went to the Levitical Priesthood which of course was responsible for all of the healthcare. This could be called socialized medicine because it was based on your ability to pay.

Although the Religious Right loves to teach tithing nevertheless they find it offensive if tithers are entitled to medical care.



zer0netgain
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Mar 2009
Age: 58
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,615

19 Aug 2011, 12:44 pm

androbot2084 wrote:
The ancient Israel government imposed a ten percent tax called a tithe. This tithe went to the Levitical Priesthood which of course was responsible for all of the healthcare. This could be called socialized medicine because it was based on your ability to pay.

Although the Religious Right loves to teach tithing nevertheless they find it offensive if tithers are entitled to medical care.


You understand NOTHING about ancient Israel or their customs.

By commandment, the Levitical Priesthood was forbidden to work. The priesthood was their job. They couldn't do anything else. The "tithe" was the only income they had to support themselves. The tithe also considered of goods as well as money. While in many Protestant denominations pastors are often having to work regular jobs AND do their jobs as pastors, many other denominations put great emphasis in providing every pastor in their organization a livable wage because the job of pastor isn't just a Sunday service...it's a seven day a week responsibility.



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 89
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

19 Aug 2011, 1:00 pm

zer0netgain wrote:
androbot2084 wrote:
The ancient Israel government imposed a ten percent tax called a tithe. This tithe went to the Levitical Priesthood which of course was responsible for all of the healthcare. This could be called socialized medicine because it was based on your ability to pay.

Although the Religious Right loves to teach tithing nevertheless they find it offensive if tithers are entitled to medical care.


You understand NOTHING about ancient Israel or their customs.

By commandment, the Levitical Priesthood was forbidden to work. The priesthood was their job. They couldn't do anything else. The "tithe" was the only income they had to support themselves. The tithe also considered of goods as well as money. While in many Protestant denominations pastors are often having to work regular jobs AND do their jobs as pastors, many other denominations put great emphasis in providing every pastor in their organization a livable wage because the job of pastor isn't just a Sunday service...it's a seven day a week responsibility.


Not only that, the Levi'im were granted no land in the subdivision of the Holy Land among the Tribes.

ruveyn



androbot2084
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Mar 2011
Age: 65
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,447

19 Aug 2011, 1:16 pm

The Levitical Priesthood were the Medical Doctors. On Saturdays they were forbidden to work unless it was an emergency.