11th Circuit Court of Appeals slams Individual Mandate
Inuyasha wrote:
grrr bbrrrapptt ning ning ningg walla walla zoop zoop
I don't understand is calling someone a partisan lunatic a complement when it comes from you?
_________________
?We must not look at goblin men,
We must not buy their fruits:
Who knows upon what soil they fed
Their hungry thirsty roots??
http://jakobvirgil.blogspot.com/
JakobVirgil wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
grrr bbrrrapptt ning ning ningg walla walla zoop zoop
I don't understand is calling someone a partisan lunatic a complement when it comes from you?
So you think it's okay to call conservatives terrorists because they think that we can't keep doing out of control spending.
Inuyasha wrote:
JakobVirgil wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
grrr bbrrrapptt ning ning ningg walla walla zoop zoop
I don't understand is calling someone a partisan lunatic a complement when it comes from you?
So you think it's okay to call conservatives terrorists because they think that we can't keep doing out of control spending.
when they hold the country hostage yeah sure.
But of course with my tongue in my cheek.
Are you going to start lecturing on crazy rhetoric?
you should that the only kind you use.
_________________
?We must not look at goblin men,
We must not buy their fruits:
Who knows upon what soil they fed
Their hungry thirsty roots??
http://jakobvirgil.blogspot.com/
JakobVirgil wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
JakobVirgil wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
grrr bbrrrapptt ning ning ningg walla walla zoop zoop
I don't understand is calling someone a partisan lunatic a complement when it comes from you?
So you think it's okay to call conservatives terrorists because they think that we can't keep doing out of control spending.
when they hold the country hostage yeah sure.
But of course with my tongue in my cheek.
Are you going to start lecturing on crazy rhetoric?
you should that the only kind you use.
Thing is the Republicans had a deal of $800 billion in new revenue and $4 trillion in cuts, the Republicans presented a plan that did that, then Obama said after the Republicans had fulfilled that which they had agreed to, that he wanted another $400 billion in revenue on top of the $800 billion. That is what is called moving the goalpost, Obama had no intention of having a deal, he wanted to use the debt ceiling situation for political gains. The Republicans passed multiple other solutions in the House, and the Democrats tabled them in the Senate, wouldn't even allow them to be debated on the Senate floor.
So saying the Republicans was holding the country hostage is disingenious especially since we have yet to see this "plan" Obama kept saying he had.
Inuyasha wrote:
JakobVirgil wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
JakobVirgil wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
grrr bbrrrapptt ning ning ningg walla walla zoop zoop
I don't understand is calling someone a partisan lunatic a complement when it comes from you?
So you think it's okay to call conservatives terrorists because they think that we can't keep doing out of control spending.
when they hold the country hostage yeah sure.
But of course with my tongue in my cheek.
Are you going to start lecturing on crazy rhetoric?
you should that the only kind you use.
Thing is the Republicans had a deal of $800 billion in new revenue and $4 trillion in cuts, the Republicans presented a plan that did that, then Obama said after the Republicans had fulfilled that which they had agreed to, that he wanted another $400 billion in revenue on top of the $800 billion. That is what is called moving the goalpost, Obama had no intention of having a deal, he wanted to use the debt ceiling situation for political gains. The Republicans passed multiple other solutions in the House, and the Democrats tabled them in the Senate, wouldn't even allow them to be debated on the Senate floor.
So saying the Republicans was holding the country hostage is disingenious especially since we have yet to see this "plan" Obama kept saying he had.
sure that is exactly how it went down . . .
on fox news the rest of us (in reality )
saw a completely different story.
_________________
?We must not look at goblin men,
We must not buy their fruits:
Who knows upon what soil they fed
Their hungry thirsty roots??
http://jakobvirgil.blogspot.com/
JakobVirgil wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
JakobVirgil wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
JakobVirgil wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
grrr bbrrrapptt ning ning ningg walla walla zoop zoop
I don't understand is calling someone a partisan lunatic a complement when it comes from you?
So you think it's okay to call conservatives terrorists because they think that we can't keep doing out of control spending.
when they hold the country hostage yeah sure.
But of course with my tongue in my cheek.
Are you going to start lecturing on crazy rhetoric?
you should that the only kind you use.
Thing is the Republicans had a deal of $800 billion in new revenue and $4 trillion in cuts, the Republicans presented a plan that did that, then Obama said after the Republicans had fulfilled that which they had agreed to, that he wanted another $400 billion in revenue on top of the $800 billion. That is what is called moving the goalpost, Obama had no intention of having a deal, he wanted to use the debt ceiling situation for political gains. The Republicans passed multiple other solutions in the House, and the Democrats tabled them in the Senate, wouldn't even allow them to be debated on the Senate floor.
So saying the Republicans was holding the country hostage is disingenious especially since we have yet to see this "plan" Obama kept saying he had.
sure that is exactly how it went down . . .
on fox news the rest of us (in reality )
saw a completely different story.
And you are dumb enough to believe the DNC's lapdogs.
Inuyasha wrote:
JakobVirgil wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
JakobVirgil wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
JakobVirgil wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
grrr bbrrrapptt ning ning ningg walla walla zoop zoop
I don't understand is calling someone a partisan lunatic a complement when it comes from you?
So you think it's okay to call conservatives terrorists because they think that we can't keep doing out of control spending.
when they hold the country hostage yeah sure.
But of course with my tongue in my cheek.
Are you going to start lecturing on crazy rhetoric?
you should that the only kind you use.
Thing is the Republicans had a deal of $800 billion in new revenue and $4 trillion in cuts, the Republicans presented a plan that did that, then Obama said after the Republicans had fulfilled that which they had agreed to, that he wanted another $400 billion in revenue on top of the $800 billion. That is what is called moving the goalpost, Obama had no intention of having a deal, he wanted to use the debt ceiling situation for political gains. The Republicans passed multiple other solutions in the House, and the Democrats tabled them in the Senate, wouldn't even allow them to be debated on the Senate floor.
So saying the Republicans was holding the country hostage is disingenious especially since we have yet to see this "plan" Obama kept saying he had.
sure that is exactly how it went down . . .
on fox news the rest of us (in reality )
saw a completely different story.
And you are dumb enough to believe the DNC's lapdogs.
_________________
?We must not look at goblin men,
We must not buy their fruits:
Who knows upon what soil they fed
Their hungry thirsty roots??
http://jakobvirgil.blogspot.com/
JakobVirgil wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
JakobVirgil wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
JakobVirgil wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
JakobVirgil wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
grrr bbrrrapptt ning ning ningg walla walla zoop zoop
I don't understand is calling someone a partisan lunatic a complement when it comes from you?
So you think it's okay to call conservatives terrorists because they think that we can't keep doing out of control spending.
when they hold the country hostage yeah sure.
But of course with my tongue in my cheek.
Are you going to start lecturing on crazy rhetoric?
you should that the only kind you use.
Thing is the Republicans had a deal of $800 billion in new revenue and $4 trillion in cuts, the Republicans presented a plan that did that, then Obama said after the Republicans had fulfilled that which they had agreed to, that he wanted another $400 billion in revenue on top of the $800 billion. That is what is called moving the goalpost, Obama had no intention of having a deal, he wanted to use the debt ceiling situation for political gains. The Republicans passed multiple other solutions in the House, and the Democrats tabled them in the Senate, wouldn't even allow them to be debated on the Senate floor.
So saying the Republicans was holding the country hostage is disingenious especially since we have yet to see this "plan" Obama kept saying he had.
sure that is exactly how it went down . . .
on fox news the rest of us (in reality )
saw a completely different story.
And you are dumb enough to believe the DNC's lapdogs.
I'm talking about people like Chris Matthews whom got a shiver up his leg listening to Obama speak.
The ancient Israel government imposed a ten percent tax called a tithe. This tithe went to the Levitical Priesthood which of course was responsible for all of the healthcare. This could be called socialized medicine because it was based on your ability to pay.
Although the Religious Right loves to teach tithing nevertheless they find it offensive if tithers are entitled to medical care.
androbot2084 wrote:
The ancient Israel government imposed a ten percent tax called a tithe. This tithe went to the Levitical Priesthood which of course was responsible for all of the healthcare. This could be called socialized medicine because it was based on your ability to pay.
Although the Religious Right loves to teach tithing nevertheless they find it offensive if tithers are entitled to medical care.
Although the Religious Right loves to teach tithing nevertheless they find it offensive if tithers are entitled to medical care.
You understand NOTHING about ancient Israel or their customs.
By commandment, the Levitical Priesthood was forbidden to work. The priesthood was their job. They couldn't do anything else. The "tithe" was the only income they had to support themselves. The tithe also considered of goods as well as money. While in many Protestant denominations pastors are often having to work regular jobs AND do their jobs as pastors, many other denominations put great emphasis in providing every pastor in their organization a livable wage because the job of pastor isn't just a Sunday service...it's a seven day a week responsibility.
zer0netgain wrote:
androbot2084 wrote:
The ancient Israel government imposed a ten percent tax called a tithe. This tithe went to the Levitical Priesthood which of course was responsible for all of the healthcare. This could be called socialized medicine because it was based on your ability to pay.
Although the Religious Right loves to teach tithing nevertheless they find it offensive if tithers are entitled to medical care.
Although the Religious Right loves to teach tithing nevertheless they find it offensive if tithers are entitled to medical care.
You understand NOTHING about ancient Israel or their customs.
By commandment, the Levitical Priesthood was forbidden to work. The priesthood was their job. They couldn't do anything else. The "tithe" was the only income they had to support themselves. The tithe also considered of goods as well as money. While in many Protestant denominations pastors are often having to work regular jobs AND do their jobs as pastors, many other denominations put great emphasis in providing every pastor in their organization a livable wage because the job of pastor isn't just a Sunday service...it's a seven day a week responsibility.
Not only that, the Levi'im were granted no land in the subdivision of the Holy Land among the Tribes.
ruveyn
