The feminisation of education or are boys getting dumber?

Page 6 of 8 [ 123 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next

LKL
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jul 2007
Age: 50
Gender: Female
Posts: 7,402

28 Sep 2011, 8:34 pm

Wrt. why women don't advance in science:
www.advancingwomen.org/files/7/127.pdf
Don't let the URL fool you; this was published in Nature.
Some other interesting studies:
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notro ... countries/
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notro ... al-muzzle/
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notro ... -at-maths/

Talk is interesting, but data will set you free. :)



LKL
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jul 2007
Age: 50
Gender: Female
Posts: 7,402

29 Sep 2011, 2:19 am

I knew I'd seen this argument long ago: some ancient refutations by none less than a goddess.
Look for "Where the Boyz Are" a little more than 2/3 of the way down:
http://echidneofthesnakes.blogspot.com/ ... 3546123259
and look for "Girls and Boys and Schools" just past halfway:
http://echidneofthesnakes.blogspot.com/ ... 9561646027



Jono
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 Jul 2008
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,677
Location: Johannesburg, South Africa

29 Sep 2011, 3:41 am

LKL wrote:
Wrt. why women don't advance in science:
www.advancingwomen.org/files/7/127.pdf
Don't let the URL fool you; this was published in Nature.
Some other interesting studies:
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notro ... countries/
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notro ... al-muzzle/
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notro ... -at-maths/

Talk is interesting, but data will set you free. :)


And here's another one suggesting that women in science are not necessarily discriminated against:

http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2011/02/02/1014871108.abstract

No one is denying that stereotyping can discourage women from entering those fields, however you need to understand the concept of multiple causes. I think we should get rid of stereotypes and discrimination but underrepresentation is not in and of itself evidence of discrimination. It is true that in standardized math tests, there is no difference in the average ability. Neither gender is better than the other one on average. However, the stats also show that there higher variation of ability in men. In other words, even though both men and women have the same ability on average, more men than women score the highest and more men than women score the lowest. Here's a study:

http://gcq.sagepub.com/content/52/2/146

Old news article:

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121691806472381521.html



Jono
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 Jul 2008
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,677
Location: Johannesburg, South Africa

29 Sep 2011, 5:35 am

LKL wrote:
I knew I'd seen this argument long ago: some ancient refutations by none less than a goddess.
Look for "Where the Boyz Are" a little more than 2/3 of the way down:
http://echidneofthesnakes.blogspot.com/ ... 3546123259
and look for "Girls and Boys and Schools" just past halfway:
http://echidneofthesnakes.blogspot.com/ ... 9561646027


If you can cite a blog as evidence, then here's another one that provides a rebuttal:

http://glennsacks.com/blog/?page_id=2237



DW_a_mom
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Feb 2008
Gender: Female
Posts: 13,689
Location: Northern California

01 Oct 2011, 9:32 pm

An excellent book came out on this topic a couple of years ago, and I have seen the author speak at a school group: "The Trouble With Boys," by Peg Tyre.

Every parent in the room agreed with all the points she made. We have seen everything she talked about.

I am raising a son and a daughter and I think that any educational system that dramatically favors one over the other harms our society, long run. I grew up in a world that discriminated against women, but the answer never should have been to turn things against boys.

My son's 6th grade language arts projects had ten percent of the grade based on neatness and art. They didn't write essays, they wrote essays that had formatting and artistic requirements, turning the writing into a mini book, story chart, or some other nonsense that had nothing to do with teaching English. These rubrics strongly favor girls.

School is now a constant series of graded minutia, with an extreme emphasis on organizational skills. Because on average girls acquire organizational skills at a younger age than boys, this also favors girls.

And so on.

So why should women care if school favors them?

1) Women like having smart guys around to date. Who is my daughter going to marry if 60% of college grads are women? The odds of her marrying someone of her own education level just went down. On average, women care a lot more about having an intellectually compatible mate than men do.

2) It hurts the brain power of our work force. On average, men are in the work for more years, being more likely to become the breadwinners for their families. As long as women are the ones having the babies, they will be more likely to choose to stay home to raise those children than men. Which means we need men with strong education, and can't just replace it with women. Not an equal exchange.

3) Allowing any percentage of population to get wrongly discouraged and stop short of their potential is a waste of human resource. Boys may be on a different developmental path than girls, but when all grown up, most of it evens out.

And so on.

This is a real issue in the US right now, and will have long range implications if not dealt with.


_________________
Mom to an amazing young adult AS son, plus an also amazing non-AS daughter. Most likely part of the "Broader Autism Phenotype" (some traits).


SyphonFilter
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Feb 2011
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 2,161
Location: The intersection of Inkopolis’ Plaza & Square where the Turf Wars lie.

01 Oct 2011, 9:44 pm

I don't think that one sex is smarter than the other. And, smarter how? Using IQ tests to measure intelligence?



Inuyasha
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Jan 2009
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,745

01 Oct 2011, 11:13 pm

DW_a_mom wrote:
An excellent book came out on this topic a couple of years ago, and I have seen the author speak at a school group: "The Trouble With Boys," by Peg Tyre.

Every parent in the room agreed with all the points she made. We have seen everything she talked about.

I am raising a son and a daughter and I think that any educational system that dramatically favors one over the other harms our society, long run. I grew up in a world that discriminated against women, but the answer never should have been to turn things against boys.

My son's 6th grade language arts projects had ten percent of the grade based on neatness and art. They didn't write essays, they wrote essays that had formatting and artistic requirements, turning the writing into a mini book, story chart, or some other nonsense that had nothing to do with teaching English. These rubrics strongly favor girls.

School is now a constant series of graded minutia, with an extreme emphasis on organizational skills. Because on average girls acquire organizational skills at a younger age than boys, this also favors girls.

And so on.

So why should women care if school favors them?

1) Women like having smart guys around to date. Who is my daughter going to marry if 60% of college grads are women? The odds of her marrying someone of her own education level just went down. On average, women care a lot more about having an intellectually compatible mate than men do.

2) It hurts the brain power of our work force. On average, men are in the work for more years, being more likely to become the breadwinners for their families. As long as women are the ones having the babies, they will be more likely to choose to stay home to raise those children than men. Which means we need men with strong education, and can't just replace it with women. Not an equal exchange.

3) Allowing any percentage of population to get wrongly discouraged and stop short of their potential is a waste of human resource. Boys may be on a different developmental path than girls, but when all grown up, most of it evens out.

And so on.

This is a real issue in the US right now, and will have long range implications if not dealt with.


Wow we agree on something for once.



Joker
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Mar 2011
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,593
Location: North Carolina The Tar Heel State :)

01 Oct 2011, 11:58 pm

Inuyasha wrote:
DW_a_mom wrote:
An excellent book came out on this topic a couple of years ago, and I have seen the author speak at a school group: "The Trouble With Boys," by Peg Tyre.

Every parent in the room agreed with all the points she made. We have seen everything she talked about.

I am raising a son and a daughter and I think that any educational system that dramatically favors one over the other harms our society, long run. I grew up in a world that discriminated against women, but the answer never should have been to turn things against boys.

My son's 6th grade language arts projects had ten percent of the grade based on neatness and art. They didn't write essays, they wrote essays that had formatting and artistic requirements, turning the writing into a mini book, story chart, or some other nonsense that had nothing to do with teaching English. These rubrics strongly favor girls.

School is now a constant series of graded minutia, with an extreme emphasis on organizational skills. Because on average girls acquire organizational skills at a younger age than boys, this also favors girls.

And so on.

So why should women care if school favors them?

1) Women like having smart guys around to date. Who is my daughter going to marry if 60% of college grads are women? The odds of her marrying someone of her own education level just went down. On average, women care a lot more about having an intellectually compatible mate than men do.

2) It hurts the brain power of our work force. On average, men are in the work for more years, being more likely to become the breadwinners for their families. As long as women are the ones having the babies, they will be more likely to choose to stay home to raise those children than men. Which means we need men with strong education, and can't just replace it with women. Not an equal exchange.

3) Allowing any percentage of population to get wrongly discouraged and stop short of their potential is a waste of human resource. Boys may be on a different developmental path than girls, but when all grown up, most of it evens out.

And so on.

This is a real issue in the US right now, and will have long range implications if not dealt with.


Wow we agree on something for once.


I agree as well 8)



LKL
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jul 2007
Age: 50
Gender: Female
Posts: 7,402

02 Oct 2011, 1:15 am

Jono wrote:

It does suggest that giving birth and caring for a family and household are discriminated against. ;)
Also, it doesn't address the PDF study that I posted, despite having been published a decade after it and despite said study being widely cited and well-known.

Quote:
No one is denying that stereotyping can discourage women from entering those fields, however you need to understand the concept of multiple causes. I think we should get rid of stereotypes and discrimination but underrepresentation is not in and of itself evidence of discrimination. It is true that in standardized math tests, there is no difference in the average ability. Neither gender is better than the other one on average. However, the stats also show that there higher variation of ability in men. In other words, even though both men and women have the same ability on average, more men than women score the highest and more men than women score the lowest. Here's a study:

http://gcq.sagepub.com/content/52/2/146

Old news article:

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121691806472381521.html

It's been pretty well demonstrated that men, as a group, have a larger standard deviation than women. I think what we are discussing here, though, is what the respective averages for each group are (generally the same in most studies), and what opportunities are presented to equally-skilled, equally-intelligent members of the two groups.

Got an error on the wordpress site. Tried twice.
Regardless, I was presenting the blog not as evidence, but for the arguments it presented.



lilypadfad
Toucan
Toucan

User avatar

Joined: 15 Aug 2010
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 297
Location: banned :(

02 Oct 2011, 4:13 am

Some have suggested that education should be tailored for each individual pupil. It is a nice idea, but resources are finite, it's just not feasible.
To me the solution seems obvious, segregation in the classroom. The most successful schools in my country are the single sex private schools. (Not just boys schools, all girls schools do much better too, it seems girls benefit just as much from being taught separately).
Boys would have a different curriculum, different exams (do-or-die, no coursework), lots of competition in the classroom and a whole load of sports.
The girls don't need much changing, the system is pretty much perfect as is. But should a big female-centric change need to be brought in, they can just do it, no need to worry about the boys.

It won't be perfect for every pupil, but it is _doable_ and it would help most of the boys get a better education and like I said before, it would be better for girls too.

All we'd need to do then is bring back exam standards to the 1950s and we'd have an education system to be proud of.


_________________
Crom is a grim, gloomy and unforgiving god, ever watching from atop his mountain in dark clouds and obscuring mists, ready to pass disapproving judgment on any and all. But he is said to value courage and tenacity in mortals, even if they ultimately fail.


hyperlexian
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jul 2010
Age: 54
Gender: Female
Posts: 22,023
Location: with bucephalus

02 Oct 2011, 4:25 am

lilypadfad wrote:
Some have suggested that education should be tailored for each individual pupil. It is a nice idea, but resources are finite, it's just not feasible.
To me the solution seems obvious, segregation in the classroom. The most successful schools in my country are the single sex private schools. (Not just boys schools, all girls schools do much better too, it seems girls benefit just as much from being taught separately).
Boys would have a different curriculum, different exams (do-or-die, no coursework), lots of competition in the classroom and a whole load of sports.
The girls don't need much changing, the system is pretty much perfect as is. But should a big female-centric change need to be brought in, they can just do it, no need to worry about the boys.

It won't be perfect for every pupil, but it is _doable_ and it would help most of the boys get a better education and like I said before, it would be better for girls too.

All we'd need to do then is bring back exam standards to the 1950s and we'd have an education system to be proud of.

it's feasible... cuz i did it.

what about the boys who learn better under the current system, or girl who learn better under a male-oriented approach? segregation forces them between the cracks. your "solution" creates new problems, and it would not be an improvement over the current system.


_________________
on a break, so if you need assistance please contact another moderator from this list:
viewtopic.php?t=391105


lilypadfad
Toucan
Toucan

User avatar

Joined: 15 Aug 2010
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 297
Location: banned :(

02 Oct 2011, 4:38 am

Quote:
it's feasible... cuz i did it.


Well we just need to fill schools with hyperlexians then. If politicians were willing to give up the money, I'm pretty sure we'd be doing right now. But we're not and despite more money being pumped into the system each year, educational standards for boys and girls are still dropping.

Quote:
what about the boys who learn better under the current system, or girl who learn better under a male-oriented approach?


Then those girls and boys (a minority) do poorly of course, it's better than having most of the boys AND girls who prefer a male oriented approach doing poorly right now. Number number numbers, until we have infinite resources it will never be a perfect system.

Quote:
segregation forces them between the cracks. your "solution" creates new problems, and it would not be an improvement over the current system.


A few pupils falling through cracks is better than the GAPING CHASM that boys fall into in the current system.

EDIT: went to a seminar on Friday about volunteering in schools (I was tempted to sign up, but I don't want the "paedophile" label hovering over my head). She mentioned that a worrying number of boys get to age 15/16 without being able to properly read the questions on the GCSE exam paper. This wasn't an issue 50 years ago.


_________________
Crom is a grim, gloomy and unforgiving god, ever watching from atop his mountain in dark clouds and obscuring mists, ready to pass disapproving judgment on any and all. But he is said to value courage and tenacity in mortals, even if they ultimately fail.


DW_a_mom
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Feb 2008
Gender: Female
Posts: 13,689
Location: Northern California

02 Oct 2011, 11:13 am

lilypadfad wrote:
Some have suggested that education should be tailored for each individual pupil. It is a nice idea, but resources are finite, it's just not feasible.
To me the solution seems obvious, segregation in the classroom. The most successful schools in my country are the single sex private schools. (Not just boys schools, all girls schools do much better too, it seems girls benefit just as much from being taught separately).
Boys would have a different curriculum, different exams (do-or-die, no coursework), lots of competition in the classroom and a whole load of sports.
The girls don't need much changing, the system is pretty much perfect as is. But should a big female-centric change need to be brought in, they can just do it, no need to worry about the boys.

It won't be perfect for every pupil, but it is _doable_ and it would help most of the boys get a better education and like I said before, it would be better for girls too.

All we'd need to do then is bring back exam standards to the 1950s and we'd have an education system to be proud of.


It is an interesting debate, because per the same book I referenced above, it doesn't seem to officially change the results for boys. Still, I am a firm believer in having a menu of options because each child is different, and parents should move kids around if they are in a school that isn't working for their child.


_________________
Mom to an amazing young adult AS son, plus an also amazing non-AS daughter. Most likely part of the "Broader Autism Phenotype" (some traits).


DW_a_mom
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Feb 2008
Gender: Female
Posts: 13,689
Location: Northern California

02 Oct 2011, 11:21 am

Inuyasha, just because we have opposite politics doesn't mean either one of us always has wrong-headed notions ;) I actually think it is a shame that you have such a strong persona on the boards and have been placed by most debaters, as a result, in a specific box.

To the thread in general: the trouble with debating this on the Internet is that there is excellent research, study and review on this topic, and almost none of it is available for free on-line. Same thing that happens in my paid profession (CPA/tax). The Internet isn't the end all, and we just can't grab the good stuff here.


_________________
Mom to an amazing young adult AS son, plus an also amazing non-AS daughter. Most likely part of the "Broader Autism Phenotype" (some traits).


DW_a_mom
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Feb 2008
Gender: Female
Posts: 13,689
Location: Northern California

02 Oct 2011, 11:25 am

lilypadfad wrote:
.

.

EDIT: went to a seminar on Friday about volunteering in schools (I was tempted to sign up, but I don't want the "paedophile" label hovering over my head). She mentioned that a worrying number of boys get to age 15/16 without being able to properly read the questions on the GCSE exam paper. This wasn't an issue 50 years ago.


You protect yourself from that by never being in a room without another adult in easy eye shot. That is why Boy Scouts requires two deep leadership now. People shouldn't have to worry about it; schools need men volunteering, kids need that role model.


_________________
Mom to an amazing young adult AS son, plus an also amazing non-AS daughter. Most likely part of the "Broader Autism Phenotype" (some traits).


Ancalagon
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Dec 2007
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,302

02 Oct 2011, 12:05 pm

hyperlexian wrote:
lilypadfad wrote:
Some have suggested that education should be tailored for each individual pupil. It is a nice idea, but resources are finite, it's just not feasible.

it's feasible... cuz i did it.

I don't know if doing a very large amount of per-student work is something that can be systematically done across an entire education system. I have heard a fair amount about learning styles, could something targeted per learning style work?

lilypadfad wrote:
The most successful schools in my country are the single sex private schools.

This is interesting, but does it work like this in other countries? For non-private schools?

DW_a_mom wrote:
My son's 6th grade language arts projects had ten percent of the grade based on neatness and art. They didn't write essays, they wrote essays that had formatting and artistic requirements, turning the writing into a mini book, story chart, or some other nonsense that had nothing to do with teaching English.

Ugh. That reminds me of my high school geometry class.

I love math, especially the logical and proof oriented stuff. Geometry is the subject in math where they first bring up proofs. We did not spend much time on proofs. Instead, we made wind chimes out of colorful construction paper cut out in geometrical shapes. :roll:


_________________
"A dead thing can go with the stream, but only a living thing can go against it." --G. K. Chesterton