Fnord wrote:
If time is energy, then...
How is it generated?
cw10 wrote:
Excitation at or below the quantum level.
Evidence, Please?
Fnord wrote:
What is its wavelength?
cw10 wrote:
100Mm+/- to 1pm
This email traffic statistic has nothing to do with the question.
Fnord wrote:
What is its exchange mechanism?
cw10 wrote:
Planck’s constant.
Planck's Constant is a scalar value, not an exchange mechanism.
Fnord wrote:
What is its velocity of propagation?
cw10 wrote:
c
Evidence, Please?
Fnord wrote:
What material is used to store it?
cw10 wrote:
Z
Are you referring to the atomic number of a particular element? (i.e., the the atomic number of Helium is 2 = Z(He))
Fnord wrote:
What medium is used to transmit it?
cw10 wrote:
Z0
Are you referring to the Z Boson, which is electrically neutral, has a half-life of about 3×10^25 seconds, and is associated with only the weak force?
Fnord wrote:
By what mechanism does it convert to other forms of energy?
cw10 wrote:
EM, nuclear, weak, strong.
A particle can mediate only one force, and can not change which force it mediates.
Fnord wrote:
All of these are properties of energy. If time is energy, then it will have these properties.
cw10 wrote:
Time and Energy are synonymous. Time is an invention, it bears no resemblance to reality.
Then you are saying that energy is an invention, and that it has no semblance to reality. By extension (e.g., application of E=mc^2), you are saying that matter itself is an invention, and this it also bears no resemblance to reality.
I say that the only thing lacking any semblance to reality is your understanding of physics - chronodynamics in particular.
Fnord wrote:
Explain these properties, provide links, show the math, or admit that you are wrong.
cw10 wrote:
#
That is not an answer, it a pound sign.
cw10 wrote:
I’m not a mathematician, I’m a visual thinker and artist. Tell me my variables are wrong, I know some of them have to be, but for you Fnord, I’ll give it a shot.
You'll never hit the target as long as you keep shooting blanks. Go back to your crayons and leave science to us professionals.
By the way ... would you please explain why your answers conflict with those of Robdemanc? Are you calling him a liar?