Magna wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
EzraS wrote:
orwell often springs to mind when comes to liberalism.
I seem to remember the horse practically worked to death, then is sent to the glue factory for his trouble. Using the working class like that, then tossing them away is in the realm of the right, not the left.
I'm not sure about comparing communism with "right" or conservative ideology rather than with "left" or liberal ideology.
But Boxer, the horse was a blind and unquestioning follower of Napoleon (the pig). Boxer willingly embraced the ideology and the laws forced upon him by the 'intelligentsia'. Boxer implicitly trusted the 'intelligentsia' and was proud to be a cog. Boxer worked himself to death, evermore, in allegiance to the cause. In no way, from what I recall, did Boxer believe he was being exploited as a worker, not paid enough, working as a slave for the 1% or any such thing. Quite the opposite.
In fact, it would be more accurate to say that Boxer was a victim of the intelligentsia who believed their ideas were supreme and that all others (dolts?) should be subject to them.
It's been years since I've read
Animal Farm, and while I might be wrong, I don't recall the term "intelligensia" used in regard to the pig elite. What's wrong with being intelligent, well read, and having an appreciation for the arts? Because those things are attributed to what the Russians described as the intelligensia.
In American society, I expect to see the right, not the left, using the working class till they're too tired and weak to go on, then chastise them for wanting a social safety net to care for them, let alone expecting their employers to reward loyalty and hard work with a pension after retirement.
_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer