LKL wrote:
you didn't answer the question. Do you think that 'joke' was racist, regardless of whether or not someone sharing it felt "hatred" (as opposed to just contempt) towards the people it stereotypes?
I'm not sure that a joke can be racist, not having sentience and all, but I'll try to indulge you. I could argue that the true target of the joke is affirmative action, which it satirizes (poorly) by presenting an illiterate black child as the winner of a spelling bee due to a set of increasingly ridiculous double standards, but if that was the intent the execution is lacking, and the joke is far too long. However thin it may seem, this 'mocking a widely despised government program' angle to the joke prevents it from being judged as purely racist, and injects some doubt into things.
Now, did the old guy forwarding this gem intend it as a send up of racial quotas and set asides, or did he think it was humorously mocking black people and their perceived inability to spell? Neither of us is in a position to know, and personally I'm not a big fan of passing judgment on people I don't know over things as petty as ill considered joke re-mailing. How are you so certain he even felt contempt?
Just for fun, let me give you a couple examples of what I think an unambiguously racist joke looks like:
Q) Why do Chinese people talk so funny?
A) Because their tongues are slanted too!
Q) Why are black men such dicks?
A) Cause they've got pubic hair on their heads!
See the difference? No ambiguity at all.
_________________
Your boos mean nothing, I've seen what makes you cheer.
- Rick Sanchez