I am not asking you, I am f*****g telling you! Fantasy based
They don't stop being fantasy-based just because we can't stamp them out. And no, I don't think we can---irrationality in general is too convenient to give it up as a way to show you think whatever way you want to and get to shove your particular brand of it down others' throats wherever you're in charge.
_________________
The red lake has been forgotten. A dust devil stuns you long enough to shroud forever those last shards of wisdom. The breeze rocking this forlorn wasteland whispers in your ears, “Não resta mais que uma sombra”.
It's also what many religious authorities tried to do wherever they had enough power.
_________________
The red lake has been forgotten. A dust devil stuns you long enough to shroud forever those last shards of wisdom. The breeze rocking this forlorn wasteland whispers in your ears, “Não resta mais que uma sombra”.
I have heard this sentiment expressed before by a Christian couple. He also belonged to the Masons. They said that God put animals here for us to use for our benefit. I find this view to be like a cultural narcissism.
Yeah I wasn't overly surprised when I heard it said, I figured they had to believe something like that since according to their bible God made Eden for Adam and Eve to basically abuse...aside from God's one special f*****g apple of course, that s**t is tasty and thus off limits.
edit: I'm not a fan of apples, so it makes me question how good of gardener God actually is if his prime crop makes me want to gag.
I assume that you're joking. Its impossible for any human being to dislike apples!
But I digress.
If you actually read the scripture you will see that Genesis never actually mentions "apples".
Its described as a "fruit". The "fruit" of the tree of knowledge.
Apples dont do well in the Middle East. So the "fruit" more likely a fig, or a grape, or a pomegranite. But apples do thrive in northern Europe, and in the eastern USA. So in the last few centuries the forbidden fruit has been imagined as being an apple in Western countries.
Additionally the Biblical principle is not "thou shalt not eat apples because they are tasty" nor is it "use and abuse the planet and the animals and the Garden and the environment until it is ruined spoiled and devastated, and then the rapture happens."
The Biblical principles are: Trust and obey God whether you understand the strictures or not"
And: "I have made you stewards of the Garden and of the earth. Be fruitful and multiply and, as stewards of the earth, be responsible and respectful not wasteful or despoiling."
Biblical teaching is that it is sin that wastes, destroys and despoils the earth and the environment. Nowhere in the Bible does it say that people should go about working on ruining the Earth so the Rapture can happen sooner. Not sure where your Mason acquaintances got that idea but it certainly isn't in an holistic interpretation of Scripture.
And yes, I'm aware that the op and the general sentiment of the thread is that if I believe the Bible I'm a fantasy-based-religion believer and I should be banned or marginalized or possibly even killed for clinging to a religion that is rapidly losing all semblance of popularity.
I don't care. I Know Whom I Have Believed and will Cling to the Old Rugged Cross and the world can despise me from now until the Kingdom comes. Jesus said that would happen. Haters gonna hate.
_________________
Your neurodiverse (Aspie) score: 141 of 200
Your neurotypical (non-autistic) score: 71 of 200
You are very likely neurodiverse (Aspie)
Official diagnosis: Austism Spectrum Disorder Level One, without learning disability, without speech/language delay; Requiring Support
I have heard this sentiment expressed before by a Christian couple. He also belonged to the Masons. They said that God put animals here for us to use for our benefit. I find this view to be like a cultural narcissism.
Yeah I wasn't overly surprised when I heard it said, I figured they had to believe something like that since according to their bible God made Eden for Adam and Eve to basically abuse...aside from God's one special f*****g apple of course, that s**t is tasty and thus off limits.
edit: I'm not a fan of apples, so it makes me question how good of gardener God actually is if his prime crop makes me want to gag.
I assume that you're joking. Its impossible for any human being to dislike apples!
But I digress.
If you actually read the scripture you will see that Genesis never actually mentions "apples".
Its described as a "fruit". The "fruit" of the tree of knowledge.
Apples dont do well in the Middle East. So the "fruit" more likely a fig, or a grape, or a pomegranite. But apples do thrive in northern Europe, and in the eastern USA. So in the last few centuries the forbidden fruit has been imagined as being an apple in Western countries.
Additionally the Biblical principle is not "thou shalt not eat apples because they are tasty" nor is it "use and abuse the planet and the animals and the Garden and the environment until it is ruined spoiled and devastated, and then the rapture happens."
The Biblical principles are: Trust and obey God whether you understand the strictures or not"
And: "I have made you stewards of the Garden and of the earth. Be fruitful and multiply and, as stewards of the earth, be responsible and respectful not wasteful or despoiling."
Biblical teaching is that it is sin that wastes, destroys and despoils the earth and the environment. Nowhere in the Bible does it say that people should go about working on ruining the Earth so the Rapture can happen sooner. Not sure where your Mason acquaintances got that idea but it certainly isn't in an holistic interpretation of Scripture.
And yes, I'm aware that the op and the general sentiment of the thread is that if I believe the Bible I'm a fantasy-based-religion believer and I should be banned or marginalized or possibly even killed for clinging to a religion that is rapidly losing all semblance of popularity.
I don't care. I Know Whom I Have Believed and will Cling to the Old Rugged Cross and the world can despise me from now until the Kingdom comes. Jesus said that would happen. Haters gonna hate.
As I said earlier, that was one specific denomination I'm not going to mention, I'm not claiming all Christians believe that way. There were other Christian denominations that had much healthy views of the environment in my opinion. The reason this one belief stood out was the complete hubris and arrogance of it-- that's the only reason I repeated it.
I agree, that is arrogant to the point of being despicable. I'm glad to know you don't think all Christians believe that way about despoiling the planet we live on.
_________________
Your neurodiverse (Aspie) score: 141 of 200
Your neurotypical (non-autistic) score: 71 of 200
You are very likely neurodiverse (Aspie)
Official diagnosis: Austism Spectrum Disorder Level One, without learning disability, without speech/language delay; Requiring Support
The obvious inability of anyone to categorize the notion of what constitutes a fantasy based religious belief, and a religious belief that does not conform to 'fantasized belief' makes the original poster's proposition inherently futile.
_________________
Sebastian
"Don't forget to floss." - Darkwing Duck
Wishfull thinking & oildriven-technologies brought: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technological_utopianism
A techno-utopia is therefore a hypothetical ideal society, in which laws, government, and social conditions are solely operating for the benefit and well-being of all its citizens, set in the near- or far-future, when advanced science and technology will allow these ideal living standards to exist; for example, post-scarcity, transformations in human nature, the abolition of suffering and even the end of death. In the late 20th and early 21st centuries, several ideologies and movements, such as the cyberdelic counterculture, the Californian Ideology, transhumanism, and singularitarianism, have emerged promoting a form of techno-utopia as a reachable goal. (Cultural critic Imre Szeman argues technological utopianism is an irrational social narrative because there is no evidence to support it. He concludes that it shows the extent to which modern societies place faith in narratives of progress and technology overcoming things, despite all evidence to the contrary.)
It sure beats an invisible guy in the sky that is never seen but always obeyed like a good little slave would do.
Regards
DL
The original post is rather scary.
"Lets forcibly ban all religions that I don't like" is the nub of what he is saying.
No. Only those based on fantasy as a human mind is too important to allow religious liars to have their way with it.
What is scary about advocating reality instead of fantasy as a belief system?
Regards
DL
Jesus said no such thing. Scribes did. You have never cared enough about your religion to look at it's roots. Right?
http://www.pbs.org/moyers/journal/03132009/watch.html
Rabbi Hillel, the older contemporary of Jesus, said that when asked to sum up the whole of Jewish teaching, while he stood on one leg, said, "The Golden Rule. That which is hateful to you, do not do to your neighbor. That is the Torah. And everything else is only commentary. Now, go and study it."
Please listen as to what is said about literal reading.
"Origen, the great second or third century Greek commentator on the Bible said that it is absolutely impossible to take these texts literally. You simply cannot do so. And he said, "God has put these sort of conundrums and paradoxes in so that we are forced to seek a deeper meaning."
Regards
DL

