Kraichgauer wrote:
adifferentname wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
I can just as easily say that you're a racist using arguments equality and fairness for set upon whites to cover your a$$. Then again, too many conservatives and libertarians are.
By all means give it your best shot, Bill. However, as your claim would rely exclusively on false representations of my stated beliefs, my principles and my character, you'd be risking the wrath of any mod who happened to read your post.
You, on the other hand, have explicitly stated your support for the racist concept that is "white privilege". I would probably be justified in overtly stating that you are a racist, and yet I've refrained from doing so, instead pointing out the racism of your ideas.
Do you understand how one of these approaches is conducive to reasonable debate, whilst the other is designed to silence dissent and shut down discourse?
So, what's your argument against white privilege?
Already provided it. You've neglected to reciprocate.
Quote:
That white people are being set upon? That non-whites are just underachieving whiners?
Would it be remiss of me to suggest that the problem lies with Theory of Mind? You keep insisting on projecting racial motives on everyone else, when you're the one constructing a model of society that's based on skin colour.
Quote:
And just how am I a racist?
You tell me, Bill. I'm interested only in the racist ideas you're actively espousing or defending. Whether or not you're a racist is immaterial to me.
Quote:
By saying that my own people as a group (not individuals, mind you) have it better than other groups due to institutional and cultural racism?
You're so close, and yet so far.
Quote:
Again, I can accuse you of being a racist
I've already invited you to do so. Be my guest.
Quote:
for denying that other groups of people face discrimination that whites don't.
Citation needed.
Quote:
Then there's the question: why do you feel this way?
What way would that be? Is this another example of projection on your part?