kraftiekortie wrote:
I believe these people were chosen because they are convicted violent felons.
There's nobody actively going around taking away peoples' guns. No knocks on the door. There's not nearly enough people to do this, should it be so desired.
The most they do here is have occasional "campaigns" where there is an "amnesty," the person turns in the gun/guns to the cops, and the person turning in the gun/guns gets a sum of money.
You’d be wrong. And some of those felons are probably only felons cause the safe act.
Just like people believe a assault weapon ban is to ban machine guns .
As others point out and I did to there are people actively going to doors and taking guns.
As for the last thing, if gun bans work how is it such events still turn up lots of guns?
Why’s london seeing more and more guns turning up?
FYI, they get $50 in food cards for guns that cost $1,000
They should have to pay fair market value at last time such guns were legal. So they should have to pay people 3,000 dollars for s gun thst cost 800 original it panic buying brought up the price. 1,500 for school handgun. Can the state of New York afford to pay hundred if millions or billions? Legal gun confiscation in thenus would cost the government trillions.