magz wrote:
Fnord wrote:
Wolfram87 wrote:
Surely the valuing of paler skin in non-white countries counts as a form of classism rather than racism? Since it's not about association with white people, but rather a presumption about what kind of work you do. Thus I don't see how that can be sorted under the same heading as actual White Supremacists.
I'm approaching this from the perspective of white skin color rather than a white "race"; but you can witness what I'm talking about in cultures where white-skinned foreigners are given greater deference than dark-skinned natives.
Racism and classism are closely related, and European features are often preferred by members of non-European cultures. For evidence, you need look no further than Anime, Manga, and all their various genres -- you will rarely (if ever) see a character that has distinctly Asian features unless that character is a very minor one, even though Anime and Manga are created mostly by Asian artists; and although the characters' names are usually Asian, they still usually look European (and almost never African).
You can also see advertisements on billboards and television broadcasts for skin-whitening creams in the Philippines and India (at least I have). People from those countries also come to the Los Angeles area to have cosmetic surgery to make them look more "white" (i.e., nose jobs, permanent hair removal, bone sculpting, removal of the epicanthic fold, et cetera).
There is nothing "supreme" about being "white", so why do even non-white people act as if the opposite was true?In my short period of being cosmetics nerd, I learned about it: East Asian elegantes - especially South East Asian ones - can do craziest things not get tanned. Being tanned is associated with working in fields, thus, being lower social class.
Similar associations were common in Renaissance Europe, probably other periods, too, but from 20th century onwards, social meaning of tan changed in Europe.
When I was a child and teenager, the most fashionable look here was being tanned to impossibility - strong tan suggested you could afford exotic holidays. The market reacted with artificial solaria, health concerns were raised and as I entered adulthood, unnaturally strong tan became associated with bad taste. Current fashion for fitness promotes "natural" tan suggesting you spend at least some time outdoors.
Exactly
In most cultures during most of history "tan equals you work out in the fields", ergo you are working class.
Ergo "light equals aristocracy".
In traditional China having dangerously long fingernails was also a mark of aristocracy. For the same reason. A peasant does manual labor and wears down his fingernails. And aristocrat doesnt do manual labor ergo long fingernails (on both genders) is a badge of high status.
Europe had a similar thing about skin color (light equals high status), but then in the twentieth century (in Europe and in White America) it flipped. Working stiffs spent all day IN doors in factories and offices. And having a tan was a mark being able to afford vacations to the Riviera or to Florida, and became a mark of high status.