Is it sexist to use the word "girl" in reference to adult
KT67 wrote:
I think in terms of fertility, there's a biological reason why female beauty is linked in with youth more than male beauty is. (Although for sociological reasons - we don't say 'male beauty'. Handsomeness then)
Darn, I just told my son today that he is beautiful (after a haircut). I was going to say handsome, but am sick of hearing myself say that and wanted variety.
KT67 wrote:
Rugged jawlines & muscles etc are attractive to a lot of people
There's a (heterosexual) study that showed that the attractiveness of characteristics (jawline, broad shoulders) inversely correlated with universal healthcare. No joke. In a country with poor healthcare (like USA according to the study) broad shoulders were more likely to be seen as masculine and the non-broad shoulders as effeminate. In a country with good healthcare, the non-broad shoulders were more likely to be seen as masculine and the broad shoulders as brutish. Sorting out the men from the "boys" (or guys).
It's not sexist, it's just how English is structured: the word "girl" is a female counterpart of both "boy" (child) and "guy" (adult). It's equally correct to say "guys and girls" and "boys and girls" when describing a mixed group, depending on the age of people you're describing.
That said, it's more common to use the "girl" or "guy" in informal contexts or when referring to young people. You never see it in contexts like business, law, or politics; that's where "man" and "woman" are used exclusively.
