Page 6 of 10 [ 147 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  Next

psychohist
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Feb 2010
Age: 65
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,623
Location: Somerville, MA, USA

18 Nov 2010, 3:59 pm

visagrunt wrote:
The matter has already been tried, before no less a forum than the Supreme Court of the United States: Butler v. Perry (1916) 240 U.S. 328 (S.C.)

"Separate but equal" was considered constitutional at that time, too. Even the Supreme Court makes mistakes.



number5
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Jun 2009
Age: 47
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,691
Location: sunny philadelphia

18 Nov 2010, 4:40 pm

ruveyn wrote:

Suppose you did not feel like showing up for the venire?
ruveyn


Then just tell them that you approve of actual slavery. :P



number5
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Jun 2009
Age: 47
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,691
Location: sunny philadelphia

18 Nov 2010, 4:44 pm

psychohist wrote:
number5 wrote:
I have been called for jury duty 3 times so far in my life and have served a total of 8 hours, for which I was paid.

You might want to follow the thread. Sand is specifically arguing against my suggestion that jury duty be paid. I was the one advocating payment. Hopefully that will help resolve your bafflement.


My bafflement is not about the petty cash. It's about equating the horrors of actual slavery to a slight inconvenience once every few years or so. Apples and shoes.



skafather84
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Mar 2006
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,848
Location: New Orleans, LA

18 Nov 2010, 5:14 pm

Prison is slavery; jury duty is a compulsory citizen duty.


_________________
Wherever they burn books they will also, in the end, burn human beings. ~Heinrich Heine, Almansor, 1823

?I wouldn't recommend sex, drugs or insanity for everyone, but they've always worked for me.? - Hunter S. Thompson


ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 88
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

18 Nov 2010, 5:15 pm

skafather84 wrote:
Prison is slavery; jury duty is a compulsory citizen duty.


Which is involuntary servitude. That is illegal under the 13th Amendment.

ruveyn



skafather84
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Mar 2006
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,848
Location: New Orleans, LA

18 Nov 2010, 5:23 pm

ruveyn wrote:
skafather84 wrote:
Prison is slavery; jury duty is a compulsory citizen duty.


Which is involuntary servitude. That is illegal under the 13th Amendment.

ruveyn



Yeah, of course you'd have everything against any kind of civic responsibility.


_________________
Wherever they burn books they will also, in the end, burn human beings. ~Heinrich Heine, Almansor, 1823

?I wouldn't recommend sex, drugs or insanity for everyone, but they've always worked for me.? - Hunter S. Thompson


visagrunt
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Oct 2009
Age: 58
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,118
Location: Vancouver, BC

18 Nov 2010, 5:29 pm

psychohist wrote:
"Separate but equal" was considered constitutional at that time, too. Even the Supreme Court makes mistakes.


Which is why my post went on to say,

visagrunt wrote:
until the Supreme Court sees fit to reverse itself.


:roll:


_________________
--James


ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 88
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

18 Nov 2010, 8:43 pm

skafather84 wrote:
ruveyn wrote:
skafather84 wrote:
Prison is slavery; jury duty is a compulsory citizen duty.


Which is involuntary servitude. That is illegal under the 13th Amendment.

ruveyn



Yeah, of course you'd have everything against any kind of civic responsibility.


I am all in favor of civic responsibility. I am against involuntary servitude. Why not have voluntary juries? We have volunteer police forces, fire departments, military. Why is jury service an exception?

You have people volunteering for jury service. If they are qualified for a case they are chosen and they are paid a reasonable sum for their time in service. We can limit the number of times a citizen can volunteer in a time period so people do not make a career out of jury service.

What is special about jury service that it has to be compelled under threat of jail or fines?

ruveyn



Sand
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Sep 2007
Age: 99
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,484
Location: Finland

18 Nov 2010, 9:23 pm

ruveyn wrote:
skafather84 wrote:
ruveyn wrote:
skafather84 wrote:
Prison is slavery; jury duty is a compulsory citizen duty.


Which is involuntary servitude. That is illegal under the 13th Amendment.

ruveyn



Yeah, of course you'd have everything against any kind of civic responsibility.


I am all in favor of civic responsibility. I am against involuntary servitude. Why not have voluntary juries? We have volunteer police forces, fire departments, military. Why is jury service an exception?

You have people volunteering for jury service. If they are qualified for a case they are chosen and they are paid a reasonable sum for their time in service. We can limit the number of times a citizen can volunteer in a time period so people do not make a career out of jury service.

What is special about jury service that it has to be compelled under threat of jail or fines?

ruveyn


All citizens benefit from having juries. Just as all citizens pay taxes involuntarily there are many vital functions of government that all citizens should be responsible to perform. Money is not the only value government should require from good citizens.



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 88
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

18 Nov 2010, 9:26 pm

Sand wrote:

All citizens benefit from having juries. Just as all citizens pay taxes involuntarily there are many vital functions of government that all citizens should be responsible to perform. Money is not the only value government should require from good citizens.


All citizens benefit from having cops, soldiers and firemen. So why is jury service different?

ruveyn



Sand
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Sep 2007
Age: 99
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,484
Location: Finland

18 Nov 2010, 10:39 pm

ruveyn wrote:
Sand wrote:

All citizens benefit from having juries. Just as all citizens pay taxes involuntarily there are many vital functions of government that all citizens should be responsible to perform. Money is not the only value government should require from good citizens.


All citizens benefit from having cops, soldiers and firemen. So why is jury service different?

ruveyn


Because there is no such thing as a professional juror. No one needs to train to qualify to be a juror.



psychohist
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Feb 2010
Age: 65
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,623
Location: Somerville, MA, USA

19 Nov 2010, 12:39 am

number5 wrote:
psychohist wrote:
My bafflement is not about the petty cash. It's about equating the horrors of actual slavery to a slight inconvenience once every few years or so. Apples and shoes.

(1) It's not "petty cash" when it's the difference between feeding and caring for your children for those days and not doing so, which is sometimes the case.

(2) It may be a slight inconvenience to you, but don't make the mistake of assuming everyone else is like you. For some, even lifetime slavery might be a blessing for the security it brings; that doesn't make it something other than slavery.



psychohist
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Feb 2010
Age: 65
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,623
Location: Somerville, MA, USA

19 Nov 2010, 12:40 am

Sand wrote:
Because there is no such thing as a professional juror. No one needs to train to qualify to be a juror.

My understanding is that the Italian system basically uses professional jurors.



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 88
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

19 Nov 2010, 7:15 am

Sand wrote:

Because there is no such thing as a professional juror. No one needs to train to qualify to be a juror.


To be a juror one must be able to read write, speak and do logic. This requires training. Barbarians would not be qualified to be jurors.

ruveyn



Sand
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Sep 2007
Age: 99
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,484
Location: Finland

19 Nov 2010, 8:51 am

ruveyn wrote:
Sand wrote:

Because there is no such thing as a professional juror. No one needs to train to qualify to be a juror.


To be a juror one must be able to read write, speak and do logic. This requires training. Barbarians would not be qualified to be jurors.

ruveyn


On that basic I doubt you would qualify since I have never run across anybody with more barbaric social outlooks than you.



number5
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Jun 2009
Age: 47
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,691
Location: sunny philadelphia

19 Nov 2010, 10:08 am

psychohist wrote:
number5 wrote:
psychohist wrote:
My bafflement is not about the petty cash. It's about equating the horrors of actual slavery to a slight inconvenience once every few years or so. Apples and shoes.

(1) It's not "petty cash" when it's the difference between feeding and caring for your children for those days and not doing so, which is sometimes the case.

(2) It may be a slight inconvenience to you, but don't make the mistake of assuming everyone else is like you. For some, even lifetime slavery might be a blessing for the security it brings; that doesn't make it something other than slavery.


On (1), if serving as a juror is documented to bring about any economic hardship, then the juror is excused.

And (2), slavery = blessing ?! 8O