nightbender wrote:
the crusades were launch as a defensive war against 300 years of moslem aggression theft rape murder and opppression
Sort of, but not entirely as you say.Yes, the Crusades were in response to Islamic expansion, but weren't completely defensive either. And then there is the issue where the Crusaders sacked Constantinople during the Fourth Crusade. Those weren't Muslims in that city.
Quote:
as for any brutality the idea of rules in war wasnt really codified till the treaty of westphalia
Rape, pillaging, and wanton murder are intuitively wrong to all but the most depraved individuals. That said, the Crusaders were no worse than other armies at the time, and their leaders at least had (relatively) noble intentions.
_________________
WAR IS PEACE
FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH