Bradleigh wrote:
Yes control is a bad thing, one person controling the others is a bad thing, it is like the idea of the flood in the Halo universe. The flood shares one mind but once it is absolute there will be total peace.
I don't know Halo.
Quote:
But what the society should be is one big thing that is made up of all the small pieces.
The very notion that a society exists already presupposes that.
Quote:
One problem with today is that the people who need the help can not be heard over the people who do not need it, like I know that we tend to idolise celebrities (not me) now if we work off these celebrities we don't want to help the poor. But serously why does a person need to earn $1million, how could a person need that, well this money they do not serously need could be imagined as things like food that may be needed by others. Have you seen how much a bussines director gets paid, and how much are they contributing to the comunity, but then you see all those people who contribute so much to comunity but get so little. Everyone should be equal in how the government/law responds to them, one of the things that angered me the most is how Paris Hilton was given some levy, and how OJ Simpson was almost let off as he is a celebrity.
Yes, ok, people do not act how you'd like.
They likely get that amount because that is somewhat reflective of what they are seen as being able to do for a given project. An actor's name can pull in lots and lots of money just by itself, so, what is being bought is the name. Doesn't the actor have the right over his name? Perhaps we would want this money to go elsewhere, but if we accept that the original owner of it has it legitimately, and that the actor legitimately bargained for it, then then outcome must be legitimate as well.
Oh yes, I have heard of how much company directors get paid. A major issue in payment is doing something that other productive people decide is worth their money. If people loved charity, then charities would be where the money would be at. People do not care as much though.
As for the power of the rich before the law... yeah, that is sort of sucky. You should also keep in mind what Scientology does too. It sues people in order to drain them of their money. Like, they don't have to have a real case, they can just sue the crap out of people to ruin them. If there is an abuse of law, then that would be one of them.