Ragtime wrote:
So, you decide what's wrong based on your gut feeling? Would you give that pass to everyone else who does the same?
Keep in mind that that group of people includes active practitioners of, respectively, every crime known to man.
So, by your standard, which I'll term "gut-feeling morality", anyone who doesn't feel inside that breaking a law is wrong
is free to break it. Obviously, societal chaos is the natural result of practicing that, and allowing "gut-feeling morality" to be the final word on right and wrong.
why do you refuse to acknowledge that altruism is a part of the nature of the higher primates? there's been a lot of research about this, there were a few threads on this board quoting the famous "morality test" which proved that people of different religions and cultures make the same decisions about what's right and what's wrong?
you might call it gut-feeling or you might call it morality or the word of God or whatever, but essentially it's the same thing.
there are a lot of dilemmas that can not be solved if you only have the Bible as the source of your morality (abortion, in-vitro, stem cell research etc). if God were the only source of morality how come he's not sending another son down here to tell us what is the correct solution? all religion is man-made, that's why they all agree on the same basic rules, and that's why they are the same rules the atheists follow.
Not every aspect of modern life can be addressed biblically. Abortion, IVF, transgenderism, stem cells, none of these things had been dreamed of by the writers of Scripture in their day. And so the Bible can't speak to these modern issues. But the overall message of Scripture is timeless.