06 Aug 2016, 7:07 am
06 Aug 2016, 7:14 am
As my clients at the penitentiary told me -
If it don't apply let it fly. 
06 Aug 2016, 7:27 pm
06 Aug 2016, 10:09 pm
07 Aug 2016, 1:16 am
Clinton's lead over Trump narrows to less than three points: Reuters/Ipsos poll | Reuters. http://tiny.iavian.net/bn1n
WOO HOO!
GO BIG T (X3)! 
07 Aug 2016, 4:30 am
07 Aug 2016, 7:30 am
07 Aug 2016, 7:38 am
07 Aug 2016, 9:54 am
cathylynn wrote:
a person has to be a bit suicidal to vote for trump for two reasons: i'm (i think realistically) worried about a trump presidency not being able to be weathered for two reasons: a thin-skinned sociopath with the nuclear codes and less time afterward to deal with global warming. there's no coming back from an extinction.
how is hillary going to 'fix' global warming in the next 4 or 8 years?
People that pimp this dilemma don't even know what they want or believe in something totally unrealistic.Trump isn't the warmongering candidate, Hillary is. If you want more endless war in the middle east and more brinkmanship with countries like Russia and China then Hillary is who you want to vote for. She has no regard for the law or ethics, she has never shown an ounce of good judgement or even competency in anything she has ever done in the political arena, I'd like to find one Hillary supporter that isn't a blind partisan or someone consumed by fear about Trump.
Perhaps your fears would be more believable if the Democrats didn't nominate Hillary Clinton, she is a terrible person who belongs in prison. Who knows, she may end up there yet...
07 Aug 2016, 10:14 am
07 Aug 2016, 10:16 am
I hope those in the States participate in Congress primary and election.
Usually the Executive branch and Judicial don't make the law of the land.
07 Aug 2016, 10:17 am
Jacoby wrote:
Perhaps your fears would be more believable if the Democrats didn't nominate Hillary Clinton, she is a terrible person who belongs in prison. Who knows, she may end up there yet...
Younger folks may not even be aware of Hillary Clinton's long pattern of consistently disreputable conduct. Here's a piece from the New York Times exactly 20 years ago:
http://www.nytimes.com/1996/01/08/opini ... -lies.html
Blizzard of Lies
By WILLIAM SAFIRE
Published: January 8, 1996
Americans of all political persuasions are coming to the sad realization that our First Lady -- a woman of undoubted talents who was a role model for many in her generation -- is a congenital liar.
Drip by drip, like Whitewater torture, the case is being made that she is compelled to mislead, and to ensnare her subordinates and friends in a web of deceit....
Therefore, ask not "Why didn't she just come clean at the beginning?" She had good reasons to lie; she is in the longtime habit of lying; and she has never been called to account for lying herself or in suborning lying in her aides and friends.
07 Aug 2016, 10:45 am
Darmok wrote:
Jacoby wrote:
Perhaps your fears would be more believable if the Democrats didn't nominate Hillary Clinton, she is a terrible person who belongs in prison. Who knows, she may end up there yet...
Younger folks may not even be aware of Hillary Clinton's long pattern of consistently disreputable conduct. Here's a piece from the New York Times exactly 20 years ago:
http://www.nytimes.com/1996/01/08/opini ... -lies.html
Blizzard of Lies
By WILLIAM SAFIRE
Published: January 8, 1996
Americans of all political persuasions are coming to the sad realization that our First Lady -- a woman of undoubted talents who was a role model for many in her generation -- is a congenital liar.
Drip by drip, like Whitewater torture, the case is being made that she is compelled to mislead, and to ensnare her subordinates and friends in a web of deceit....
Therefore, ask not "Why didn't she just come clean at the beginning?" She had good reasons to lie; she is in the longtime habit of lying; and she has never been called to account for lying herself or in suborning lying in her aides and friends.
nothing has changed in over 20 years!
it was the same for the 20 years before that even too!
Hillary is not fit to hold office, she cannot be trusted
07 Aug 2016, 11:50 am
07 Aug 2016, 12:10 pm
Jacoby wrote:
Darmok wrote:
Jacoby wrote:
Perhaps your fears would be more believable if the Democrats didn't nominate Hillary Clinton, she is a terrible person who belongs in prison. Who knows, she may end up there yet...
Younger folks may not even be aware of Hillary Clinton's long pattern of consistently disreputable conduct. Here's a piece from the New York Times exactly 20 years ago:
http://www.nytimes.com/1996/01/08/opini ... -lies.html
Blizzard of Lies
By WILLIAM SAFIRE
Published: January 8, 1996
Americans of all political persuasions are coming to the sad realization that our First Lady -- a woman of undoubted talents who was a role model for many in her generation -- is a congenital liar.
Drip by drip, like Whitewater torture, the case is being made that she is compelled to mislead, and to ensnare her subordinates and friends in a web of deceit....
Therefore, ask not "Why didn't she just come clean at the beginning?" She had good reasons to lie; she is in the longtime habit of lying; and she has never been called to account for lying herself or in suborning lying in her aides and friends.
nothing has changed in over 20 years!
it was the same for the 20 years before that even too!
Hillary is not fit to hold office, she cannot be trusted
Most of this nonsense has been 'created' by Republicans. When she has been investigated by Congress, she has been cleared by Republicans who ran the investigations, some on multiple occasions. The head of the current investigation even accidentally admitted that they were investigating her simply to cloud her reputation, even though a Republican investigation has already cleared her...
07 Aug 2016, 12:15 pm
