Inuyasha wrote:
Well, if the woman doesn't what the kid, it's better than killing him/her.
So one option on the table is killing the woman, is it?
By the way, I caught another one of your Freudian slips.
Inuyasha wrote:
I don't buy your statement that he said the kid is forcibly taken away.
This fat, ugly, polygamous adulterer is your favorite candidate right now, but you don't know a damned thing about him, do you? Other than his voice is like sweet Conservative music in your ear.
Newt Gingrich wants to bring back orphanages, to take
forcibly the children of "Welfare Queens", so that the "Welfare Queens" will be forced to find employment. Once contraception, abortion, sodomy and masturbation have been outlawed, the orphanages will be necessary also to warehouse the glut of unwanted children.
Under the Inuyasha plan, if the woman cannot support the rapist's child on $35 per month, then tough titties. They can both die in the gutter.
Under the Newt Gingrich plan, the woman will never see that $35 per month. Once the rapist's child is born, it is off to the orphanage, so that the rape victim will be able to work right away, without the child getting in her way.
Inuyasha wrote:
This isn't the twilight zone.
Really?