Page 56 of 93 [ 1477 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59 ... 93  Next

Hadron
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Aug 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 957
Location: IntensitySquared or Zomg

10 Aug 2007, 3:46 pm

Ragtime wrote:
Hadron wrote:
greenblue wrote:
Sopho wrote:
Ragtime wrote:
Hadron wrote:
Again you miss the point.


She's good at that. Wait till she gets going!

I don't know who this was in reference to, although I'm guessing either me or Sedaka, probably me. I haven't missed any points. It would be difficult to miss them, as you only seem to have about two.

You know what, You and Sedaka are the only ones here who have the most common sense and most intelligence here on this bloody thread.

Good to see you excluded yourself from that definition. Am I still a troll, p**** wussy?


He's just in line for Sedaka's mostly-male harem. Not sure if she's officially recuiting yet...

Has he been offered sexual favours by any chance? That explains it.



Sopho
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Apr 2007
Gender: Female
Posts: 10,859

10 Aug 2007, 3:47 pm

Sedaka wrote:
doesnt mean that's how it works for everyone... i dont know how hard soph tried (like having sex or not)... but i somehow think she knew it wouldn't work and at least she isnt trying to pretend... and i get the impression she at least tried A LOT LONGER THAN YOU DID


for all the sex topics and things you've shared on WP....

this is the first we've ever heard of your homoerotica :roll:

I didn't have sex with any men - that's one of the reasons I'm so relieved I have AS and SAD. If I hadn't then it's definately possible that I would have done that. I very nearly did get involved with 2 guys actually (not at the same time) - one of them was gay himself and doing the exact same thing lol and the other was very shy (possibly to the extent of social phobia) so nothing happened with either of them. But I've liked girls since primary school and only accepted it myself and admitted it to people within the last couple years. So it's most of my life that I've been trying to force myself to be straight and pretending to myself that I was, even though I knew in my head that I wasn't.
That's why I'm so sure it's not possible for everyone th change their sexuality. Maybe some people, but definately not everyone. If there was a way, I'd have found it. And having sex with a man wouldn't have done that because I would have hated it. I don't need to do it to know that.



Sopho
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Apr 2007
Gender: Female
Posts: 10,859

10 Aug 2007, 3:48 pm

Hadron wrote:
My challenge is above, put up or shut up.

He has just as much right to post here as anyone else. He doesn't have to go over to Intensity to f**k around with you if he doesn't want to.



Sedaka
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Jul 2006
Age: 44
Gender: Female
Posts: 4,597
Location: In the recesses of my mind

10 Aug 2007, 3:49 pm

Ragtime wrote:
Sedaka wrote:
even kids with 180 IQ do not have the ability to rationalize these things anymore than the mentally ret*d.

Bwahahahaha!! ! :lol:



since when does intelligence encompass wisdom and the ability to deduce such things......

w/e


_________________
Neuroscience PhD student

got free science papers?

www.pubmed.gov
www.sciencedirect.com
http://highwire.stanford.edu/lists/freeart.dtl


Sedaka
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Jul 2006
Age: 44
Gender: Female
Posts: 4,597
Location: In the recesses of my mind

10 Aug 2007, 3:51 pm

Hadron wrote:
greenblue wrote:
Sopho wrote:
Ragtime wrote:
Sopho wrote:
We're unconvinced because you haven't provided any decent arguments in support of your position.


No, you decide by feelings rather than by truth.

That's not true actually. Even if I was straight I would have this exact same view. I arrived at this conclusion logically. It is discrimination. If you weren't allowed to marry anyone you would ever want to be with then I would think that was wrong as well. Again, please stop making unfounded assumptions about me or anyone else who disagrees with you.

I am straight, if anyone wants to really know :P
and I have the same view, so thise feelings rather than truth, doesn't apply to me, and I believe Sopho's arguments are a lot more reasonable and logical than Ragtime's and Hadron's views.

Because you are choosing to be totally biased... You are not even considering myselfs and Ragtimes arguements. Do you have nothing better to do that snip innanely at the sidelines?


have you not read the thread yet? he was here way before you contributing.........

plz read the thread.......


_________________
Neuroscience PhD student

got free science papers?

www.pubmed.gov
www.sciencedirect.com
http://highwire.stanford.edu/lists/freeart.dtl


greenblue
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Mar 2007
Age: 50
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,896
Location: Home

10 Aug 2007, 3:56 pm

Hadron wrote:
greenblue wrote:
Hadron wrote:
greenblue wrote:
Sopho wrote:
Ragtime wrote:
Sopho wrote:
We're unconvinced because you haven't provided any decent arguments in support of your position.


No, you decide by feelings rather than by truth.

That's not true actually. Even if I was straight I would have this exact same view. I arrived at this conclusion logically. It is discrimination. If you weren't allowed to marry anyone you would ever want to be with then I would think that was wrong as well. Again, please stop making unfounded assumptions about me or anyone else who disagrees with you.

I am straight, if anyone wants to really know :P
and I have the same view, so thise feelings rather than truth, doesn't apply to me, and I believe Sopho's arguments are a lot more reasonable and logical than Ragtime's and Hadron's views.

Because you are choosing to be totally biased... You are not even considering myselfs and Ragtimes arguements. Do you have nothing better to do that snip innanely at the sidelines?

I am being honest and I am being just and I am trying to be as open minded as I can about sexuality and these people's rights, which clearly neither of you are, I support Sopho's and Sedaka's arguments because it is the right thing to do, my head tells me that gay people deserve to be seen as equals in this world, why is this so hard to comprehend?

So you are biased then. You have taken a side because you feel it is right, and havent done it on rationality. So what is the point in you posting then. All you are doing is sniping. If you want to do that go to Intensity and call me out.

I am not taking sides, I am for the truth, and The Truth Shall Make Us Free. 8)

Sniping? it seems you are the one who was doing this, weren't you? if not trolling then sniping perhaps.
I am actually here because I sympathize with the nice people here who are not straight and may feel outcasts for not being too well accepted in society, this is not about taking sides, I am more aware of this situation to just take sides to see who I can annoy or what can I win, funny isn't it? that you think that.


_________________
?Everything is perfect in the universe - even your desire to improve it.?


Sedaka
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Jul 2006
Age: 44
Gender: Female
Posts: 4,597
Location: In the recesses of my mind

10 Aug 2007, 3:56 pm

Ragtime wrote:
Hadron wrote:
Again you miss the point.


She's good at that. Wait till she gets going!


wow....

he still hasnt made that pivotal connection between his two disconjointed points........ that would give any relevance.... we've already dis


team up all you want... lol

i know who's missing more points.


_________________
Neuroscience PhD student

got free science papers?

www.pubmed.gov
www.sciencedirect.com
http://highwire.stanford.edu/lists/freeart.dtl


Sedaka
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Jul 2006
Age: 44
Gender: Female
Posts: 4,597
Location: In the recesses of my mind

10 Aug 2007, 4:00 pm

Ragtime wrote:
Sopho wrote:
Ragtime wrote:
Well, likewise, I'm not against you because you're attracted to women, I'm against your blindness in thinking it's right.

I don't think it's right to be attracted to women.
It's not right or wrong. It just is.


Well then why do you act like we should all just step aside for you? If nothing's right or wrong, then majority rules, which means you lose. You don't really want to play by those rules, do you?


that;s illogical.... and besides the point

sexual orientation is not wrong or right... but that is no basis for denying a person for being either... if anything, it's a reason not to...

if it's neither wrong nor right... then it's just cruel to deny someone something

it shouldnt be about majority

that's the point


_________________
Neuroscience PhD student

got free science papers?

www.pubmed.gov
www.sciencedirect.com
http://highwire.stanford.edu/lists/freeart.dtl


greenblue
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Mar 2007
Age: 50
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,896
Location: Home

10 Aug 2007, 4:03 pm

Sopho wrote:
Ragtime wrote:
Sopho wrote:
Ragtime wrote:
Sopho wrote:
And forcing himself to try and be attracted to men temporarily isn't being gay. I've always liked women and never liked men, even when I tried. That's different to trying to be attracted to people on a lower level.


I still don't understand why -- if it's due to some past bad experience with a man or what -- but we've already conclusively not answered that....

Exactly. You don't understand it becasue you're straight. Just like I don't understand how gay men can like men. Or how someone can like someone I find f***ing ugly.
It's not due to a past bad experience with a man either. I've never been with a man.
And what do you mean by 'we've already conclusively not answered that....'? Not answered what?


Why you hate men.

When have I EVER said I hate men?
Do you realise just how much of a twat you've made yourself look with this comment?

Yeah, I just LOLed at that comment.


_________________
?Everything is perfect in the universe - even your desire to improve it.?


Hadron
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Aug 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 957
Location: IntensitySquared or Zomg

10 Aug 2007, 4:05 pm

Sopho wrote:
Hadron wrote:
My challenge is above, put up or shut up.

He has just as much right to post here as anyone else. He doesn't have to go over to Intensity to f**k around with you if he doesn't want to.

Are you his appointed spokesman then? Didnt think so.



Sopho
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Apr 2007
Gender: Female
Posts: 10,859

10 Aug 2007, 4:05 pm

greenblue wrote:
Yeah, I just LOLed at that comment.

I know, how stupid can someone get lol
I've never once said I hate men. There's no way he can deny making assumptions about me now.
If anything, I actually get on better with more men than I do women. I usually have more in common with them as well.



Sopho
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Apr 2007
Gender: Female
Posts: 10,859

10 Aug 2007, 4:07 pm

Hadron wrote:
Sopho wrote:
Hadron wrote:
My challenge is above, put up or shut up.

He has just as much right to post here as anyone else. He doesn't have to go over to Intensity to f**k around with you if he doesn't want to.

Are you his appointed spokesman then? Didnt think so.

Are people not allowed to reply to anything that wasn't directly aimed at them in this thread? Didn't think so.



Sedaka
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Jul 2006
Age: 44
Gender: Female
Posts: 4,597
Location: In the recesses of my mind

10 Aug 2007, 4:08 pm

Ragtime wrote:
I called you a moron, once, in private, but I never damned you to Hell. And I think you've well paid me back for that by calling me a dolt just now. Still settin' the ol' example for young Kilroy, eh teacher? :lol:


you've proven we're not above name calling and so i doso as well....... and if you wanna go tit for tat... you would win by far for all the names you have called me in this thread alone... let alone in private and other threads... so your cries here mean nothing

and im not being overly mean by calling you a dolt.... and like i said, i laugh at when you call me names

and you have said very much where you think ill go


i have not even given you an ounce of what is in my mind to say to you.

kilroy....he wanted no gay bashing... and in return there should be no religous bashing... which is not what im doing... and i am not cursing really at you or anything... dolt (and moron for that matter)

when you grow up and get manners ill use mine for you.


and as for your patronizing remark of calling me teacher here... you've said this is not the classroom... so whatever.

just another example of how low you stoop...

edit: and there's a matter of class to it too.... you depend on degrading onliners with most of your name calling... whereas i at least put it in context


_________________
Neuroscience PhD student

got free science papers?

www.pubmed.gov
www.sciencedirect.com
http://highwire.stanford.edu/lists/freeart.dtl


Sedaka
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Jul 2006
Age: 44
Gender: Female
Posts: 4,597
Location: In the recesses of my mind

10 Aug 2007, 4:12 pm

Ragtime wrote:
Sedaka wrote:
that's why it's also laughable that you just write it off because it's "sick"


I admit that was a euphamism. I used it since you can't understand the concept of "evil".


and you cant understand the conept of a discussion which requires more than smart alec remarks......

even substituing in "Evi" doesnt take away from my comment regrading the depth and breadth for your regard on why it's wrong to have sex with a child...

and yet again... you dont address it


_________________
Neuroscience PhD student

got free science papers?

www.pubmed.gov
www.sciencedirect.com
http://highwire.stanford.edu/lists/freeart.dtl


Hadron
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Aug 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 957
Location: IntensitySquared or Zomg

10 Aug 2007, 4:13 pm

Sopho wrote:
Hadron wrote:
Sopho wrote:
Hadron wrote:
My challenge is above, put up or shut up.

He has just as much right to post here as anyone else. He doesn't have to go over to Intensity to f**k around with you if he doesn't want to.

Are you his appointed spokesman then? Didnt think so.

Are people not allowed to reply to anything that wasn't directly aimed at them in this thread? Didn't think so.

And my question was clearly addressed to him. Butt out. He seemed to have pussied off...



Sedaka
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Jul 2006
Age: 44
Gender: Female
Posts: 4,597
Location: In the recesses of my mind

10 Aug 2007, 4:14 pm

Ragtime wrote:
Sedaka wrote:
Ragtime wrote:
But that's how you view Christians -- you've written such many times.


generalizations FTL!

Exactly! Stop broadbrushing us.

Sedaka wrote:
you're the one who hates all gays ect


I don't hate a single gay person. I love gay people. I want them to go to Heaven with me.



- again...... right now... all my disdain is conceptrated on you

- purely based on an assumption that isn't going to happen


_________________
Neuroscience PhD student

got free science papers?

www.pubmed.gov
www.sciencedirect.com
http://highwire.stanford.edu/lists/freeart.dtl