Homosexuality
Hadron wrote:
Sopho wrote:
Hadron wrote:
Sopho wrote:
Hadron wrote:
My challenge is above, put up or shut up.
He has just as much right to post here as anyone else. He doesn't have to go over to Intensity to f**k around with you if he doesn't want to.
Are you his appointed spokesman then? Didnt think so.
Are people not allowed to reply to anything that wasn't directly aimed at them in this thread? Didn't think so.
And my question was clearly addressed to him. Butt out. He seemed to have pussied off...
I wasn't answering the question you asked him, I'll let him do that himself if he wants. I was making a separate point that he has as much right to post here as anyone else. I'm sure you've responded to posts that were aimed at someone else before.
Sedaka
Veteran
Joined: 16 Jul 2006
Age: 44
Gender: Female
Posts: 4,597
Location: In the recesses of my mind
Ragtime wrote:
Sopho wrote:
Ragtime wrote:
Sopho wrote:
And forcing himself to try and be attracted to men temporarily isn't being gay. I've always liked women and never liked men, even when I tried. That's different to trying to be attracted to people on a lower level.
I still don't understand why -- if it's due to some past bad experience with a man or what -- but we've already conclusively not answered that....
Exactly. You don't understand it becasue you're straight. Just like I don't understand how gay men can like men. Or how someone can like someone I find f***ing ugly.
It's not due to a past bad experience with a man either. I've never been with a man.
And what do you mean by 'we've already conclusively not answered that....'? Not answered what?
Why you hate men.
how does not sexually attracted to men = hating men?
why didn't you go all the way with a man to experience what you'd expect gays to do in order to have a straight marriage?
cause you hate men?
_________________
Neuroscience PhD student
got free science papers?
www.pubmed.gov
www.sciencedirect.com
http://highwire.stanford.edu/lists/freeart.dtl
Sopho wrote:
Hadron wrote:
Sopho wrote:
Hadron wrote:
Sopho wrote:
Hadron wrote:
My challenge is above, put up or shut up.
He has just as much right to post here as anyone else. He doesn't have to go over to Intensity to f**k around with you if he doesn't want to.
Are you his appointed spokesman then? Didnt think so.
Are people not allowed to reply to anything that wasn't directly aimed at them in this thread? Didn't think so.
And my question was clearly addressed to him. Butt out. He seemed to have pussied off...
I wasn't answering the question you asked him, I'll let him do that himself if he wants. I was making a separate point that he has as much right to post here as anyone else. I'm sure you've responded to posts that were aimed at someone else before.
Not in such a fashion as you just did, no. There was no real point in you stepping in there, or are you straight after all?
Hadron wrote:
Sopho wrote:
Hadron wrote:
Sopho wrote:
Hadron wrote:
Sopho wrote:
Hadron wrote:
My challenge is above, put up or shut up.
He has just as much right to post here as anyone else. He doesn't have to go over to Intensity to f**k around with you if he doesn't want to.
Are you his appointed spokesman then? Didnt think so.
Are people not allowed to reply to anything that wasn't directly aimed at them in this thread? Didn't think so.
And my question was clearly addressed to him. Butt out. He seemed to have pussied off...
I wasn't answering the question you asked him, I'll let him do that himself if he wants. I was making a separate point that he has as much right to post here as anyone else. I'm sure you've responded to posts that were aimed at someone else before.
Not in such a fashion as you just did, no. There was no real point in you stepping in there, or are you straight after all?
What does sexuality have to do with it? And I think it's pretty obvious by now that I'm not straight. So that was a pointless question.
Sopho wrote:
Hadron wrote:
Sopho wrote:
Hadron wrote:
Sopho wrote:
Hadron wrote:
Sopho wrote:
Hadron wrote:
My challenge is above, put up or shut up.
He has just as much right to post here as anyone else. He doesn't have to go over to Intensity to f**k around with you if he doesn't want to.
Are you his appointed spokesman then? Didnt think so.
Are people not allowed to reply to anything that wasn't directly aimed at them in this thread? Didn't think so.
And my question was clearly addressed to him. Butt out. He seemed to have pussied off...
I wasn't answering the question you asked him, I'll let him do that himself if he wants. I was making a separate point that he has as much right to post here as anyone else. I'm sure you've responded to posts that were aimed at someone else before.
Not in such a fashion as you just did, no. There was no real point in you stepping in there, or are you straight after all?
What does sexuality have to do with it? And I think it's pretty obvious by now that I'm not straight. So that was a pointless question.
Alrite I will be more direct then: Why bum him?
Sedaka
Veteran
Joined: 16 Jul 2006
Age: 44
Gender: Female
Posts: 4,597
Location: In the recesses of my mind
Hadron wrote:
Sedaka wrote:
Hadron wrote:
*yawns* The immigration I am talking about is to replace the children that gay people are not having. Again you miss the point.
lol people of diff races dont immigrate into countries because gay people dont have kids....
how do you conclude this...
keep dreamin dude....
i understand your point.... you just dont have the connections...
any time we get you to talk about immigration... it turns to racism and race crimes
any time we get you to talk about gays.... it goes to immigration and birth rates
and i have countless times shot down any connection between the two... so how do you keep comming to this conclusion"?
You havent shot down anything. Lower indiginous birth rates means increased immigration required to sustain country. Basic logic.
Maybe you are looking from a very biased perspective, given the rest of that response and all your other ones.
dude,
im not neccessarily disagreeing with you... read the bold
you fail to connect this to gays....... gays dont contribute that much to immigration... if they did and were causing all this decrease in the birth rate.... where would be all your little babies of other races filling up your country and crowding you?
make a connection plz
and as i said before....... EMMIGRATION>IMMIGRATION....
_________________
Neuroscience PhD student
got free science papers?
www.pubmed.gov
www.sciencedirect.com
http://highwire.stanford.edu/lists/freeart.dtl
Sopho wrote:
Hadron wrote:
Sopho wrote:
Hadron wrote:
Sopho wrote:
Hadron wrote:
Sopho wrote:
Hadron wrote:
My challenge is above, put up or shut up.
He has just as much right to post here as anyone else. He doesn't have to go over to Intensity to f**k around with you if he doesn't want to.
Are you his appointed spokesman then? Didnt think so.
Are people not allowed to reply to anything that wasn't directly aimed at them in this thread? Didn't think so.
And my question was clearly addressed to him. Butt out. He seemed to have pussied off...
I wasn't answering the question you asked him, I'll let him do that himself if he wants. I was making a separate point that he has as much right to post here as anyone else. I'm sure you've responded to posts that were aimed at someone else before.
Not in such a fashion as you just did, no. There was no real point in you stepping in there, or are you straight after all?
What does sexuality have to do with it? And I think it's pretty obvious by now that I'm not straight. So that was a pointless question.
Alrite I will be more direct then: Why bum him?
greenblue wrote:
Ragtime wrote:
Hadron wrote:
greenblue wrote:
Sopho wrote:
Ragtime wrote:
Hadron wrote:
Again you miss the point.
She's good at that. Wait till she gets going!
I don't know who this was in reference to, although I'm guessing either me or Sedaka, probably me. I haven't missed any points. It would be difficult to miss them, as you only seem to have about two.
You know what, You and Sedaka are the only ones here who have the most common sense and most intelligence here on this bloody thread.
Good to see you excluded yourself from that definition. Am I still a troll, p**** wussy?
He's just in line for Sedaka's mostly-male harem. Not sure if she's officially recuiting yet...
... and not you either.
Works for me. I wouldn't join if she begged on her knees. Sex is so passé to me these days. Zero intellectual or spiritual stimulation.
_________________
Christianity is different than Judaism only in people's minds -- not in the Bible.
Hadron wrote:
Sopho wrote:
Hadron wrote:
Sopho wrote:
Hadron wrote:
My challenge is above, put up or shut up.
He has just as much right to post here as anyone else. He doesn't have to go over to Intensity to f**k around with you if he doesn't want to.
Are you his appointed spokesman then? Didnt think so.
Are people not allowed to reply to anything that wasn't directly aimed at them in this thread? Didn't think so.
And my question was clearly addressed to him. Butt out. He seemed to have pussied off...
lol
I can't help to laugh
Didn't I just reply to your "challenge"?
_________________
?Everything is perfect in the universe - even your desire to improve it.?
Hadron wrote:
Sopho wrote:
Hadron wrote:
Sopho wrote:
Hadron wrote:
Sopho wrote:
Hadron wrote:
Sopho wrote:
Hadron wrote:
My challenge is above, put up or shut up.
He has just as much right to post here as anyone else. He doesn't have to go over to Intensity to f**k around with you if he doesn't want to.
Are you his appointed spokesman then? Didnt think so.
Are people not allowed to reply to anything that wasn't directly aimed at them in this thread? Didn't think so.
And my question was clearly addressed to him. Butt out. He seemed to have pussied off...
I wasn't answering the question you asked him, I'll let him do that himself if he wants. I was making a separate point that he has as much right to post here as anyone else. I'm sure you've responded to posts that were aimed at someone else before.
Not in such a fashion as you just did, no. There was no real point in you stepping in there, or are you straight after all?
What does sexuality have to do with it? And I think it's pretty obvious by now that I'm not straight. So that was a pointless question.
Alrite I will be more direct then: Why bum him?
This is what you call good debating skills? lol
_________________
?Everything is perfect in the universe - even your desire to improve it.?
Sedaka wrote:
Hadron wrote:
Sedaka wrote:
Hadron wrote:
*yawns* The immigration I am talking about is to replace the children that gay people are not having. Again you miss the point.
lol people of diff races dont immigrate into countries because gay people dont have kids....
how do you conclude this...
keep dreamin dude....
i understand your point.... you just dont have the connections...
any time we get you to talk about immigration... it turns to racism and race crimes
any time we get you to talk about gays.... it goes to immigration and birth rates
and i have countless times shot down any connection between the two... so how do you keep comming to this conclusion"?
You havent shot down anything. Lower indiginous birth rates means increased immigration required to sustain country. Basic logic.
Maybe you are looking from a very biased perspective, given the rest of that response and all your other ones.
dude,
im not neccessarily disagreeing with you... read the bold
you fail to connect this to gays....... gays dont contribute that much to immigration... if they did and were causing all this decrease in the birth rate.... where would be all your little babies of other races filling up your country and crowding you?
make a connection plz
and as i said before....... EMMIGRATION>IMMIGRATION....
I did make a clear connection:
Gays have less children than Hetrosexuals
More gay people reduces birth rate.
Promoting homosexuality increases the amount of people choosing to be gay (as bisexuals undergo more homosexual relationships etc)
Reduced birth rate has to be made up for, or we end up with economic problems
Immigration makes up reduced birth rate
Too much immigration leads to social instability.
Now what dont you follow?
Hadron wrote:
Ragtime wrote:
Hadron wrote:
greenblue wrote:
Sopho wrote:
Ragtime wrote:
Hadron wrote:
Again you miss the point.
She's good at that. Wait till she gets going!
I don't know who this was in reference to, although I'm guessing either me or Sedaka, probably me. I haven't missed any points. It would be difficult to miss them, as you only seem to have about two.
You know what, You and Sedaka are the only ones here who have the most common sense and most intelligence here on this bloody thread.
Good to see you excluded yourself from that definition. Am I still a troll, p**** wussy?
He's just in line for Sedaka's mostly-male harem. Not sure if she's officially recuiting yet...
Has he been offered sexual favours by any chance? That explains it.
No. The mere hope of inhaling her CO2 is enough to keep him sitting up and panting like a well-trained puppy.
_________________
Christianity is different than Judaism only in people's minds -- not in the Bible.
Sedaka
Veteran
Joined: 16 Jul 2006
Age: 44
Gender: Female
Posts: 4,597
Location: In the recesses of my mind
Ragtime wrote:
Sopho wrote:
Ragtime wrote:
Sedaka wrote:
even kids with 180 IQ do not have the ability to rationalize these things anymore than the mentally ret*d.
Bwahahahaha!! !
Having a high IQ doesn't necessarily mean you are mature enough to get married. I have a high IQ, but I'm still very naive in a lot of ways, and apparently have a low awareness of danger.
Well, she deliberately left out my point (which she obviously couldn't deal with) that I added "also emotionally an adult", which would have blown her response out of the water. Still "running circles around" me, Sedaka?
i dont diliberately dodge anything and i apologize when i do....... unlike you
SO SORRY IF I MISSED IT....
but how does IQ mean a kid & or mentally ret*d person would be emotionally mature enough to consent?
it doesnt... so what's the point of bringing this up if it still supports my previous statement that a person in either case (kid with 180 IQ vs adult with 60 IQ) is not prepared (mentally or emotionally) to maturely make the decision to consent to sex?
you must be dizzy cause this is a weak point even for you
_________________
Neuroscience PhD student
got free science papers?
www.pubmed.gov
www.sciencedirect.com
http://highwire.stanford.edu/lists/freeart.dtl
