sinsboldly wrote:
ruveyn wrote:
sinsboldly wrote:
I have the same problem with Atheists as I do with Christians, and that is both consider their way the only way.
Atheists do not have a specific way. Atheists are defined negatively as those who reject a belief in a creator, central God who created everything and commands everything. Among atheists you find a variety of political and social beliefs. Some are pro-capitalist. Some are socialist. Some are collectivist. Both Stalin and Christopher Hitchen are atheists, yet they are so very different.
ruveyn
I see that you, as well as other posters, have missed my whole point. Being an Atheist pre supposes anyone that believes differently from their
THEIST beliefs (or lack of them) are misinformed, ignorant of the facts or just plain wrong.
For a minute there, I almost thought you were claiming atheists were absolutist about
life styles or
moralities. But it appears you're making the much more epistemic charge that atheists think they're correct about the nonexistence of God and that theists (for a variety of reasons) are wrong about the existence of God.
If you're claiming
that's being stern, I'm sorry to say, but when two positions are mutually incompatible, one or the other (and sometimes both) have to be wrong. When it comes to existence, its
generally the case that something either exists or it doesn't.
I see no better way of dealing with this issue than claiming that
someone has to be wrong. If we claim that all beliefs are "equally true" we go into epistemic relativism and lose any working concept of (small-t) truth.
And,
generally, all but a few ultra-militant atheists claim that theists are morally depraved.
You don't see atheists going to people's car and taking pictures of bumper stickers then proclaiming that they represent what "the devil offered to Adam and Eve, 'you shall become as gods...'" or some secular equivalent (come to think of it, I cannot really thing of anything an atheist would conceivably say that associates disagreement with vanity and ultimate evil as much as this).
In fact, I think that's because while atheists in general aren't epistemic relativists and postmodernists, and some may be a bit overconfident in making certain claims, they lack a belief in the ultimate end all be all capital-T Truth that fundamentalists have. They lack sheer certitude.
Can you please give my your way of holding or at least maintaining that mutually incompatible beliefs can both be true?