do hippies not realize how homophobic muslims are
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
Mohammed's birthday was never much of a significant day for the Muslims (well it is just a holiday but I don't witness significant celebrations on that day), not even in my part of the world where Muslims are more moderate than the Gulf.
The reason for this, that Mohammad's birthday wasn't a significant event to Islam as Jesus' birthday to Christianity, another reason that Muslim clerics discourage any form (even the slightest of it) of Mohammad's deification, for them glorifying the day of his birth is a kind of deification, it is a part of the Muslim culture, that's why you never see statues of Mohammad because statues are seen as form of deification as well. I was told by a Muslim pilgrim who visited Mohammad's graveyard (supposedly) in Mecca, the guard there prevented him to bow and pray for him because this was seen as an act of deification.
Recently, there was some Christian (or pagan?) traditions adopted by the regular Muslims here on Mohammad's birthday, such as Christmas lights and other decorations but the clerics made it sure to prevent this new tradition to expand.
Thank you for educating this bumpkin, Herr Dragon. I do understand the point that Islamic customs fall along different parameters in some ways from those common in Western Christianity, but I was to a large extent trying to illustrate the point that we should be conscious of how Islamic fundamentalists can often do similar things to what fundamentalists on our own shores. I figured that the example of Muhammad's b-day would bring it closer to home, but perhaps there are better examples.The reason for this, that Mohammad's birthday wasn't a significant event to Islam as Jesus' birthday to Christianity, another reason that Muslim clerics discourage any form (even the slightest of it) of Mohammad's deification, for them glorifying the day of his birth is a kind of deification, it is a part of the Muslim culture, that's why you never see statues of Mohammad because statues are seen as form of deification as well. I was told by a Muslim pilgrim who visited Mohammad's graveyard (supposedly) in Mecca, the guard there prevented him to bow and pray for him because this was seen as an act of deification.
Recently, there was some Christian (or pagan?) traditions adopted by the regular Muslims here on Mohammad's birthday, such as Christmas lights and other decorations but the clerics made it sure to prevent this new tradition to expand.
But the really important thing that fundamentalists in both cultures have in common, I think, is that they tend to make a pretense that they are the only existing and valid definition of their religion. Christian fundamentalists literally treat other Christians as if they don't exist or as if they are really just doing a poor job of imitating the "real thing." Yet they are often behaving in this way toward Christian traditions and beliefs that are a lot older and more deeply rooted in a culture than their dumb sect.
And here is the sticking point. The way I see it, a lot of the Islamic fundamentalists are using accusations of "Western cultural imperialism" to help justify their own form of imperialism. I see them trying to stamp out the dying embers of cultures that are as old as the crust of the Earth. This is deplorable in its own right, and what burns me up is that they know very well how duplicitous their behavior is.
I don't know a whole lot about your part of the world, but I know I've seen what fundamentalists are capable of doing. They destroy and ruin everything they touch. They are like locusts. What is left is an empty shell of what once was.
Quote:

Title: An Islamic preacher issues a Fatwa to kill Mikey Mouse!! And Islamist cartoons came for the call!!
Bubble: "We killed Mikey! Hurray"
Sorry, couldn't help it
This gives puddingmouse another reason to be more Islamphobe
techstepgenr8tion wrote:
marshall wrote:
I think people took my statement the wrong way. I wasn't trying to slam conservatives. I was actually defending against the accusation that liberals are "soft" on civil liberties issues when it comes to Islamic abuses. I was just sarcastically pointing out that anything short of "clash of civilizations" fear mongering and outright hatred isn't good enough to please some people. The OP just reminded me of other encounters with extreme islamophobes.
Thanks for the clarification. A bunch of other people tried to defend the literal value so we went in circles for a while.
BTW, if it were only 'making fun of' Islam rather than say doing something with regard to the 2001 incident or people handing off big resources to the associated organizations though - I agree, it would be soft. I don't know that this is what you're saying? I would think that most liberals would at least have been in favor or getting to Bin Laden?
I guess I just like to separate my foreign policy opinions and stances regarding military action against terrorism from the debate on the religion and culture of Islam. There are just too many Americans taking the "conservative" label who rub me the wrong way in their us vs. them mentality. Like I can't claim to see legitimate grievances on both sides of the Israeli-Palistinian conflict without getting labeled a supporter of suicide bombers and Islamic extremism.
Really, I condemn backwards fundamentalism of all stripes, especially the repressive Islamic brand. I just think militaristic clash-of-civilizations talk is counterproductive. There is no military solution to the problem of religious fundamentalism. Also, when I put things into perspective it seems like the terrorism threat and fear of things like Sharia law being imposed on western society is overblown to the point of being comical, if it wasn't so sad. I see Muslims as the victims of fundamentalism. They are the ones who have to deal with that s**t on an everyday basis and suffer the worst repercussions from it. When you have westerners talking about all Muslims as if they were an enemy they are imitating the exact same mentality of the Islamic whackos. It's almost like each side wants the same thing. Both are just itching to pour fuel on the fire.
I have a little more sympathy for European Islamophobes as I realize they have a sizable minority of homegrown Islamic whackos on the other side of the pond. But here in the US I really don't understand it.
techstepgenr8tion
Veteran
Joined: 6 Feb 2005
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 24,693
Location: 28th Path of Tzaddi
marshall wrote:
I guess I just like to separate my foreign policy opinions and stances regarding military action against terrorism from the debate on the religion and culture of Islam. There are just too many Americans taking the "conservative" label who rub me the wrong way in their us vs. them mentality. Like I can't claim to see legitimate grievances on both sides of the Israeli-Palistinian conflict without getting labeled a supporter of suicide bombers and Islamic extremism.
That may be a regionalism as well. As much as I sort or argued with indicating the whole were like that I think Will and Bethie are right that rural conservatives would tend to be more that way (I still wouldn't believe 'all though') while I've noticed urban conservatives - especially where I live in Cleveland where liberalism has the upper hand and likely in many cases where this is the situation, the role does reverse, the side with the more numbers gets sloppy, and its the minority opinion that ends up being sharpened and nuanced more often (kind of like what Dox would say about his area near Seattle).
marshall wrote:
Really, I condemn backwards fundamentalism of all stripes, especially the repressive Islamic brand. I just think militaristic clash-of-civilizations talk is counterproductive. There is no military solution to the problem of religious fundamentalism. Also, when I put things into perspective it seems like the terrorism threat and fear of things like Sharia law being imposed on western society is overblown to the point of being comical, if it wasn't so sad. I see Muslims as the victims of fundamentalism. They are the ones who have to deal with that sh** on an everyday basis and suffer the worst repercussions from it. When you have westerners talking about all Muslims as if they were an enemy they are imitating the exact same mentality of the Islamic whackos. It's almost like each side wants the same thing. Both are just itching to pour fuel on the fire.
And you are absolutely right - moderate muslims are the victims of fundamentalism. The challenge they have though is steeper, just in that to secularize or individualize faith choices is much more difficult the way their book is laid out. Zuhdi Jasser seems to have some good ideas was well as many other muslims who really want to bring Islam to the stage of behavior and social cohesion that Christianity and Judaism are generally at today.
marshall wrote:
I have a little more sympathy for European Islamophobes as I realize they have a sizable minority of homegrown Islamic whackos on the other side of the pond. But here in the US I really don't understand it.
I think I have a pretty good guess as to what its about, and when I had the chance to go to Australia and hear about their historical culture its funny - they have very much the same ethic and very much the same zero tolerance (or at least did under Ron Howard). Staties and Aussies have an anti-authority streak, the historical 'Don't tread on me' attitude, don't want to be told what to do, we want to live our lives as we wish to live them, and having something forced on us that we don't believe in sets our blood boiling fast.
I remember that I was pretty politically neutral in my teens, didn't think much of it, spend the time from 19 to 21 going to three day raves and partying with all kinds of people, lol, I still did even after I knew that I was a staunch conservative just because I liked all that so long as they didn't start talking politics
That said I think what we achieved last weekend is going to be worth more than we know in terms of ripple effects, I just worry and hope that a) we don't have to hash it out with Pakistan and b) that the Muslim Brotherhood doesn't take the whole south side of the Mediterranean, especially Egypt and the Suez canal.
_________________
The loneliest part of life: it's not just that no one is on your cloud, few can even see your cloud.
